Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Esco Technologies Foundation

Providing financial support to charities and others in need, focusing on children and families in communities where esco technologies inc.

$423k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Youth Development$475kFood & Nutrition$314kEducation$281kHealth$277kRecreation & Sports$165kHuman Services$152kCommunity Improvement$130kPhilanthropy$126kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 21 grants below total $234,200 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $422,885 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $188,685 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $185k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$510k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$22,700
SOUTH EL MONTE COMMUNITY OUTREACH$20,000
CAROUSEL RANCH INC$15,000
VENTURA COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE$15,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF VENTURA COUNTY$15,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF VENTURA COUNTY$15,000
UNLEASHING POTENTIAL$12,500
HINESBURG COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
RECOGNIZE GOOD$10,000
OXFORD HOUSE$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB-SANTA CLARITA$10,000
MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES$10,000
UNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY$10,000
THE PAINTED TURTLE$10,000
THE FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $327k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY OUTREACH & COMMUNITY INTERVENTION SERVICES: $5k → 14%HAVEN WOMENS CENTER OF STANISLAUS: $10k → 15%FAMILY FOOTHILL SERVICE: $10k → 14%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF GREATER MODESTO: $9k → 15%EMSEM EMERGENCY RESOURCE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%THE FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS: $9k → 15%THE FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS: $9k → 15%THE FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS: $9k → 15%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF GREATER MODESTO: $9k → 15%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF GREATER MODESTO: $9k → 15%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $10k → 11%KING STREET CENTER: $5k → 10%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF GREATER MODESTO: $9k → 15%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $8k → 11%INTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF GREATER MODESTO: $9k → 15%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $8k → 11%UNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $13k → 21%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $8k → 11%UNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $13k → 21%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $8k → 11%UNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $13k → 21%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $8k → 11%UNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $13k → 21%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $8k → 11%UNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $13k → 21%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $8k → 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $8k → 11%UNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $13k → 21%UNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $13k → 21%UNLEASHING POTENTIAL: $13k → 21%BOARD OF INNER-CITY MISSIONS OF UCC-NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES: $13k → 21%CIRCLE OF CONCERN: $5k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $23k → 11%CIRCLE OF CONCERN: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 41 repeat orgs$134k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
14

Total granted

$2.1M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+12%

Still filing today

90%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +320%
  • CR
    CAROUSEL RANCH INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $150k · revenue +49%
  • UP
    UNLEASHING POTENTIAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $113k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • FF
    Foothill Family Servicegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +57%
  • T1
    THE 1877 JOURNEY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -100%
  • FS
    FOOD SHARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
3
Valle Del Sol Inc

Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.

Health
4
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
5
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
6
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Family Place

The family place empowers victims of family violence by providing safe housing, counseling and skills that create independence while building social change to stop the violence.

Human Services
8
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
9
Family Promise of Santa Clarita Valley

With assistance of volunteers from the community and faith groups, the organization works to assist homeless children and their families to achieve sustainable independence, while offering hope, compassion, and preserving individual…

Housing & Shelter
10
Family Resources Inc

We believe that it is a privilege to work with individuals, families, and communities. we believe that they have the most insight into their past, present, and future. our role is to partner with them in creating effective solutions with…

—
11
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
12
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unleashing Potential and the most unlike its peers is Achieving My Dreams Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsUnited Way AffiliatesYouth Development ServicesFood Banks and PantriesYouth Development CentersAffordable Housing Construc…Military Veterans SupportEquine Therapy ProgramsCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%39%35–55yr16%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%29%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/58
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,507

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/53
Grantees still filing
33/53
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION — $100,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTIONVENTURA COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE INCORPORATED — $59,000 · OtherVENTURA COUNTY SEARCH AND RESCUE INCORPORAT…OUR LITTLE HAVEN — $57,500 · OtherOUR LITTLE HAVENRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS — $54,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUISAchieving My Dreams Foundation Inc — $50,000 · OtherAchieving My Dreams Foundation IncUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT INC — $68,607 · OtherUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT INCUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC — $60,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INCHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS — $67,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUISRECOGNIZEGOOD THE FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS — $32,000 · OtherDENTON FREEDOM HOUSE — $30,000 · Other+20 more — $263,118 · Other+20 moreCAROUSEL RANCH INC — $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentCAROUSEL RANCH INCSANTA CLARITA VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentSANTA CLARITA VALLE…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF VENTURA COUNTY INCORPORATED — $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SI…THE PAINTED TURTLE — $65,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PAINTED TURTLEST LOUIS CITY LEAGUE — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNLEASHING POTENTIAL — $112,500 · Human ServicesUNLEASHING POTENTI…THE FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS INC — $72,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD INITIATIV…FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER — $69,500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF KIDS WI…DENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC — $39,000 · Human ServicesDENTON COUNTY FRIE…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $22,700 · Human ServicesAmerican National …+6 more — $50,000 · Human Services+6 moreMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $165,000 · ReligionDE LA SALLE INC — $90,000 · EducationMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL — $37,000 · EducationEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $31,000 · Education+1 more — $5,000 · EducationTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC — $90,000 · HealthTURNING POINT FOUNDATION — $42,000 · HealthANNAS PALS INC — $30,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $135,000 · Recreation & SportsCALIFORNIA RANGERS INC — $15,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$871,725Youth Development$400,000Human Services$365,700Religion$165,000Education$163,000Health$162,000Recreation & Sports$155,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $165,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCAROUSEL RANCH INC — $150,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $135,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUNLEASHING POTENTIAL — $112,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetDE LA SALLE INC — $90,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $90,000 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC — $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF VENTURA COUNTY INCORPORATED — $80,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetTHE FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS INC — $72,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER — $69,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT INC — $68,607 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS — $67,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE — $65,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LITTLE HAVEN — $57,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS — $54,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAchieving My Dreams Foundation Inc — $50,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetTURNING POINT FOUNDATION — $42,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC — $39,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL — $37,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS — $32,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $31,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRECOGNIZEGOOD THE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetDENTON FREEDOM HOUSE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetANNAS PALS INC — $30,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER — $27,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetForest Park Forever Inc — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $22,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED VETERANS CHARITIES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHINESBURG COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $20,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA RANGERS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetST LOUIS CITY LEAGUE — $15,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetREVITALIZATION 2000 INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoothill Family Service — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 1877 JOURNEY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD SHARE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL MONTE-SOUTH EL MONTE EMERGENCY RESOURCES ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetHealthy Alternatives to Violent Environm — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPECIAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetREGIONAL BUSINESS COUNCIL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCIRCLE OF CONCERN — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT ENERGY EDUCATION PROGRAM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSANTA CLARITA VALLEY FOOD PANTRY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOCHRANS SKI AREA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROUSEL RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNLEASHING POTENTIAL ↗
  • Who funds DE LA SALLE INC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA CLARITA VALLEY BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF VENTURA COUNTY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD INITIATIVE OF GREATER STANISLAUS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST VERMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF TRI COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR LITTLE HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds Achieving My Dreams Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RECOGNIZEGOOD THE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DENTON FREEDOM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ANNAS PALS INC ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Forest Park Forever Inc ↗
  • Who funds Home of the Sparrow Inc ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds DISABLED VETERANS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HINESBURG COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA RANGERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS CITY LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds REVITALIZATION 2000 INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…Moneta Group Charitab…Commerce Bancshares F…Kaiser Foundation Hos…United Way of Greater…Pott FoundationWoodward Governor Cha…Enterprise Bank & Tru…Edward Jones Foundati…Enterprise Holdings F…World Wide Technology…National Life Group C…
St Louis Community Foundation IncMO21.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Pott Foundation · Woodward Governor Charitable Trust · Enterprise Bank & Trust Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Esco Technologies Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • King Street Center Inc — 43% of income from government
  • United Way of Northwest Vermont Inc — 34% of income from government
  • United Way of Tri County Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
  • Vermont Energy Education Program Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Flynn Center for the Performing Arts Ltd — 0% of income from government
  • The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines