Skip to content

· Private foundation

Erwin Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$165k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$520kHuman Services$104kHealth$95kYouth Development$18kEducation$17kRecreation & Sports$15kAnimals$6kCivil Rights$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $69k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FULLNESS OF TRUTH$52,500
ST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CHURCH$44,005
CARENET CARES$25,000
GUADALUPE RADIO NETWORK$9,000
PRIESTLY FRATERNITY OF THE MISSIONAIRES OF ST CHARLES BORROMEO$7,000
TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR LIFE$5,000
SERVANTS OF DIVINE MERCY$5,000
RESTORING CHRISTIAN CULTURE INITIATIVE$5,000
SOCIETY FOR ANIMAL RESCUE & ADOPTION$5,000
FOCUS MISSIONS$2,050
JANIS K LINDEMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$1,500
NATURAL WOMANHOOD$1,500
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES$1,000
NALA AND FRIENDS DOG RESCUE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A WOMENS HAVEN: $15k → 16%A WOMAN'S HAVEN: $10k → 16%A WOMANS HAVEN: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
CO
MD
AZ
KS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$642k · 17 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +121% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
21

Total granted

$642k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+121%
+30%

Still filing today

29%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FULLNESS OF TRUTH
    6× · 2019–2024 · $277k · revenue +102%
  • LP
    LA PROMESA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $89k · revenue +21%
  • AW
    A WOMANS HAVEN INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $50k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SA
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
  • AF
    AIR FORCE ACADEMY ATHLETIC CORPORATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • DS
    DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
2
Allyfe Pregnancy Clinics

Allyfe pregnancy clinic exists to offer truth, hope, and love to every woman and family facing an unexpected pregnancy. founded in 1985, we have built four decades of integrity as a christ-centered center of excellence - providing…

Human Services
3
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Foundation
Philanthropy
4
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
5
La Mission Por Vida
International
6
Good News Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
7
Life Network of Southern Illinois

Pregnancy testing and counseling, assistance and education to parents and babies, abstinence education, post abortion counseling and education.

Health
8
National Foundation for Alternative
Science & Tech
9
Lifechoices Womens Care Inc

To transform healthcare by providing natural, holistic and life affirming medical care - Family Medicine and Women?s Health medical services, education opportunities and ongoing support.

Health
10
South Texas Recovery Foundation Incorporated

South texas recovery foundation exists to tear down the strongholds of substance use disorder and transform lives through counseling, education and long-term support. south texas recovery foundation operates an extended recovery center for…

Health
11
Texas Public Radio

The mission of Texas Public Radio is to engage, inspire and inform, bringing people together to better understand their community and world.

Arts & Culture
12
Guadalupe Hope Society

To aid women without regard to race, creed, national origin or economic standing through the provision of available resources, support and educational materials, that they may comprehend and work through the alternatives to effect a…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Road Ministries; the most unlike its peers is Carenet Cares. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FULLNESS OF TRUTH: $276,600 · ReligionFULLNESS OF TRUTHLA PROMESA FOUNDATION: $89,330 · ReligionLA PROMESA FOUNDATION+2 more: $4,000 · ReligionST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CHURCH: $78,005 · OtherST JOHN THE EVANGELIST CATHOLIC CHURCHTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SA: $60,000 · OtherTHE UNIV OF TX HEALTH SCIENCE CTR OF SATONY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherTONY FOUNDATIONST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $16,600 · OtherST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCHJANIS K LINDEMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $16,500 · OtherJANIS K LINDEMAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONAIR FORCE ACADEMY ATHLETIC CORPORATION: $15,000 · OtherUNION OF SISTERS OF THE PRESENTATION OF THE BLESSED VIRGIN MARY: $11,500 · OtherALLIED WOMEN'S CENTER: $10,500 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH PARISH: $10,350 · Other+24 more: $60,225 · Other+24 moreA WOMANS HAVEN INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCARENET CARES: $41,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyNATURAL WOMANHOOD: $5,200 · EducationSOCIETY FOR ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION: $5,000 · AnimalsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · HealthTRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthCENTRAL SERVICE OFFICE OF SAN ANTONIO TEXAS: $100 · HealthCLUB 12: $100 · Health
Religion$369,930Other$308,680Human Services$50,000Philanthropy$41,100Education$5,200Animals$5,000Health$2,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFULLNESS OF TRUTH: $276,600 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetLA PROMESA FOUNDATION: $89,330 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetA WOMANS HAVEN INC: $50,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCARENET CARES: $41,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetNATURAL WOMANHOOD: $5,200 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetTexas Alliance for Life Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetAVE PHILOMENA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION ROAD MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL SERVICE OFFICE OF SAN ANTONIO TEXAS: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAIR FORCE ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FULLNESS OF TRUTH ↗
  • Who funds LA PROMESA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A WOMANS HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CARENET CARES ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL WOMANHOOD ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR ANIMAL RESCUE AND ADOPTION ↗
  • Who funds Texas Alliance for Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds AVE PHILOMENA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIUMPH OVER KID CANCER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Raymond James Charitable Endowment FundFL9.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Erwin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Erwin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Erwin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph