Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Erwin Family Foundation

$28k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

International$125kYouth Development$113kEducation$70kReligion$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kPhilanthropy$9kHealth$8kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$721
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bend Seventh-Day Adventist Church$15,000
Big Lake Youth Camp$7,500
Battle Ground HealthCare$3,000
Vital Life Foundation$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Extreme Mobility Camps Inc: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid-Columbia Medical Center

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness, and hope.

Health
2
Northwest Medical Foundation Tillamook

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
3
Western Health Resources

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

4
Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital Inc

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
5
Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center

Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital and Medical Center (LGSHMC), founded in 1875 is one of the earliest hospitals in the Pacific Northwest. LGSHMC provides acute and tertiary care in Portland, OR with 539 licensed beds. LGSHMC provides a…

Health
6
Adventist Health Mendocino Coast

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

7
Christian Health Care Center

Christian Health Care Center is a skilled nursing facility which provides housing services designed to meet the needs of older residents of Lynden Washington regardless of their ability to pay.

Health
8
Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital

Legacy Salmon Creek Hospital (LSCH), established in 2005, provides acute and critical care in Vancouver, with 165 licensed beds. LSCH operates adult, pediatric, and OB/GYN hospitalist programs, as well as four primary care physician…

Health
9
Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center

Legacy Mount Hood Medical Center (LMHMC) was founded in 1922 and is a community hospital in Gresham, Oregon with 115 licensed beds. LMHMC offers a wide range of services including family birth, diagnostic services, cancer treatment,…

Health
10
Adventist Health Delano

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness, and hope.

Health
11
White Memorial Medical Center dba Adventist Health White Memorial

Living Gods love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
12
Feather River Hospital

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Portland Adventist Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Extreme Mobility Camps Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BIG LAKE YOUTH CAMP — $112,500 · OtherBIG LAKE YOUTH CAMPBend Adventist Church — $30,000 · OtherBend Adventist ChurchAdventist Development and Relief Ag — $25,000 · OtherAdventist Development and Relief AgBend Seventh-Day Adventist Church — $15,000 · OtherBend Seventh-Day Adventist ChurchOregon Conference of SDA — $10,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA ADVENTIST ACADEMY — $8,000 · Other+5 more — $12,500 · Other+5 moreINTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE INC — $125,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE INCWALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY — $41,000 · EducationWALLA WALLA…VITAL LIFE A MARQUIS AND CONSONUS FOUNDATION — $8,500 · PhilanthropyPortland Adventist Medical Center — $5,000 · HealthBATTLE GROUND HEALTHCARE — $3,000 · HealthEXTREME MOBILITY CAMPS INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesCOURTS FOR KIDS — $500 · Youth Development
Other$213,000International$125,000Education$41,000Philanthropy$8,500Health$8,000Human Services$2,000Youth Development$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE INC — $125,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetVITAL LIFE A MARQUIS AND CONSONUS FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPortland Adventist Medical Center — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBATTLE GROUND HEALTHCARE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEXTREME MOBILITY CAMPS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHILDRENS CARE INC
  • Who funds WALLA WALLA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds VITAL LIFE A MARQUIS AND CONSONUS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Portland Adventist Medical Center
  • Who funds BATTLE GROUND HEALTHCARE
  • Who funds EXTREME MOBILITY CAMPS INC
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation
  • Who funds COURTS FOR KIDS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Versacare Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Erwin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Portland Adventist Medical Center0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Erwin Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Erwin Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph