Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ernest and Doris Goodman Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2019
25
Grants FY2019
5
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Ernest and Doris Goodman Charitable Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to The Jewish Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Ernest and Doris Goodman Charitable Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $22k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
’17
19
’18
12
’19
0
’20
0
’21
2
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$375kReligion$99kEducation$15kHealth$9kHuman Services$7kCivil Rights$4kInternational$2kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2019 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADAT ARI EL$9,910
DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING$1,000
CAMP RAMAH$1,000
MAYO CLINIC$1,000
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$800
AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY$750
MASORTI FOUNDATION$620
HILLEL$600
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$500
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$500
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$500
HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION$500
AMERICAN JEWISH JT DISTRIBUTION CO$360
AM FRIENDS OF MOGAN DAVID AGOM$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MAYO CLINIC: $1k → 9%CAMP RAMAH: $1k → 10%ADAT ARI EL: $10k → 14%HILLEL: $1k → 14%NEFESH B'NEFESH: $1k → 7%MAYO CLINIC: $1k → 9%CAMP RAMAH: $1k → 10%ADAT ARI EL: $10k → 14%HILLEL: $600 → 14%NEFESH B'NEFESH: $1k → 7%CAMP RAMAH: $1k → 10%ADAT ARI EL: $7k → 14%LA HEBREW HIGH SCHOOL: $750 → 14%MASORTI FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $500 → 14%LA HEBREW HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 14%MASORTI FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $500 → 14%ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1k → 17%AKIBA-SCHECHTER JEWISH SCHOOL: $500 → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $750 → 14%MASORTI FOUNDATION: $620 → 17%ZEIGLER SCHOOL OF RABBINIC: $750 → 14%ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $750 → 14%ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $500 → 17%LEO BECK TEMPLE: $500 → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $500 → 17%WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $800 → 17%WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $800 → 17%JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING: $1k → 14%WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $800 → 17%JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING: $1k → 14%JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING: $1k → 14%See attached list: $22k → 14%See attached list: $21k → 14%Jewish Community Foundation: $229k → 14%Jewish Community Foundation: $126k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION: $7k → 14%Jewish Community Foundation: $7k → 14%BUILDERS OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $3k → 14%BUILDERS OF JEWISH EDUCATION: $2k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION: $1k → 14%DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 14%DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $2k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $1k → 14%DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 14%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
IN
NJ
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86k · 33 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2019, 10 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
7

Total granted

$86k
$2k

Still filing today

48%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 4% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’22
EducationReligionCivil RightsArts & CultureHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DT
    DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +7%
  • CR
    CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +59%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $2k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • ZS
    ZEIGLER SCHOOL OF RABBINIC
    one grant, 2017 · $750
  • LB
    LEO BAECK TEMPLE
    one grant, 2018 · $500
  • AJ
    AKIBA-SCHECHTER JEWISH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
University of Judaism Foundation
—
4
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
9
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
10
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
11
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
12
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Jewish University; the most unlike its peers is The Hide and Seek Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $362,262 · OtherTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONADAT ARI EL: $26,497 · OtherADAT ARI EL+52 more: $55,902 · Other+52 moreBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $5,570 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $2,170 · ReligionNefesh B'Nefesh Jewish Souls United Inc: $2,000 · ReligionDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationUniversity of Chicago: $1,000 · EducationALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION: $720 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationMAYO CLINIC: $3,254 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $750 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,000 · Civil RightsLOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$444,661Religion$9,740Education$7,320Health$4,004Civil Rights$2,000Arts & Culture$1,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $5,570 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC: $3,370 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $3,254 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $2,170 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNefesh B'Nefesh Jewish Souls United Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBET TZEDEK: $1,220 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION: $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRIBE MEDIA CORP: $435 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC ↗
  • Who funds DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Nefesh B'Nefesh Jewish Souls United Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BET TZEDEK ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES JEWISH SYMPHONY ↗
  • Who funds THE HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jacoby Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Lynn & Les Bider Family Foundation · The Field Family Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ernest and Doris Goodman Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ernest and Doris Goodman Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ernest and Doris Goodman Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ernest and Doris Goodman Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ernest and Doris Goodman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph