Skip to content

· Private foundation

Erik T Hostvedt Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$691kEducation$45kInternational$15kHealth$4kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$644k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SERGEWORLD HARVEST MISSION$5,000
FIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION$5,000
MALVERN RETREAT HOUSE$5,000
BOLD HOPE$325
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 9% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MALVERN RETREAT HOUSE: $5k → 6%BOLD HOPE: $3k → 6%SERGE: $6k → 7%ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER: $1k → 22%COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $3k → 13%STEAMBOAT CHRISTIAN CENTER: $5k → 6%HEALY INTERNATIONAL RELIEF FOUNDATION: $542 → 7%COASTAL CHRISTIAN: $3k → 10%MALVERN RETREAT HOUSE: $3k → 6%PARVEE FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%SERGE: $4k → 7%ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER: $1k → 22%COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $3k → 13%STEAMBOAT CHRISTIAN CENTER: $5k → 6%MALVERN RETREAT HOUSE: $3k → 6%BOLD HOPE: $540 → 6%SERGE: $4k → 7%ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER: $1k → 22%COMMISSION TO EVERY NATION: $3k → 13%BOLD HOPE: $540 → 6%SEE JESUSNET: $4k → 7%CLCP: $20k → 22%BOLD HOPE: $540 → 6%SEE JESUSNET: $4k → 7%CLCP: $20k → 22%BOLD HOPE: $325 → 6%SEE JESUSNET: $4k → 7%CLCP: $10k → 22%POVERTY RESOLUTIONS: $480 → 6%LIBERTI CHURCH: $6k → 7%WOMEN OF HOPE: $1k → 22%POVERTY RESOLUTIONS: $480 → 6%LIBERTI CHURCH: $4k → 7%COVENANT CHURCH: $530k → 6%LIBERTI CHURCH: $4k → 7%COVENANT CHURCH: $26k → 6%COVENANT CHURCH: $26k → 6%COVENANT CHURCH: $19k → 6%COVENANT CHURCH: $7k → 6%FIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION: $5k → 6%FIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION: $5k → 6%FIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION: $3k → 6%FIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$825k · 15 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +80% since the first grant, against +67% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$825k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+67%

Still filing today

40%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationReligionHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PLUMSTEAD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +80%
  • SG
    SERGE GLOBAL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $13k · revenue +94%
  • SI
    SEEJESUSNET INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +201%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • WO
    WOMEN OF HOPE
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
2
Serving Beyond Borders

Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.

Human Services
3
Presbyterian Reformed Ministries International

Exalting jesus christ igniting the church in the power of the holy spirit under the authority of the holy bible as the word of god through prayer, leadership development, growing the church, and mission outreach so that the church may be…

Religion
4
World Reach Inc

World reach is a global, evangelical missions organization serving fields in east africa, central and south america, europe and the u.s. our purpose is to fulfill the the great commission of jesus christ by reaching the world with the…

Religion
5
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
6
Possibilities Africa

To mobilize and equip christians to become agents of spiritual and socio-economic transformation in africa.

International
7
Seek Partners International Inc

Christian leadership development with formal and non-formal theological education and training.

Religion
8
Seminario Reformado Latinoamericano

Srl trains ministry leaders to proclaim the gospel, equip believers, and build up the body of christ across the spanish-speaking world through reformed theological education.

Religion
9
Finisterre Vision

It is our vision to see local churches work together to establish god-glorifying churches that are self-governing, self-supporting, and self-propagating in every people group in the finisterre mountains in papua-new guinea.

Religion
10
Probe Ministries International

To present the gospel by providing life-long opportunities to integrate faith and learning through balanced, biblically based scholarship, training people to love god by renewing their minds and equipping the church to engage the world for…

Religion
11
Shepherd's Refuge-Selah Ministries Inc

We provide opportunities for spiritual renewal to pastors, church leaders and missionaries involved in the ministry of the gospel of jesus christ being renewed, refreshed and returning to their communities strengthened and more effective…

Religion
12
Living His Life Abundantly International

To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bold Hope Inc; the most unlike its peers is Healey International Relief Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COVENANT CHURCH: $607,880 · OtherCOVENANT CHURCHCLCP: $50,000 · OtherCLCP+13 more: $96,460 · Other+13 morePLUMSTEAD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $45,000 · EducationFIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION: $16,167 · InternationalBOLD HOPE INC: $5,945 · InternationalSEEJESUSNET INC: $12,000 · ReligionESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER INC: $4,050 · HealthHEALEY INTERNATIONAL RELIEF FOUNDATION INC: $542 · Philanthropy
Other$754,340Education$45,000International$22,112Religion$12,000Health$4,050Philanthropy$542

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLUMSTEAD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION: $16,167 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSEEJESUSNET INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBOLD HOPE INC: $5,945 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER INC: $4,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARVEE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLUMSTEAD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FIELDS OF ABUNDANCE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SERGE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEJESUSNET INC ↗
  • Who funds LAYMEN'S RETREAT LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds BOLD HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PARVEE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEALEY INTERNATIONAL RELIEF FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Faith FoundationPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Faith Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Erik T Hostvedt Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Erik T Hostvedt Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Healey International Relief Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Erik T Hostvedt’s filings →

More from the funding graph