Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eric and Sueann Siegel Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$49k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Civil Rights$91kPhilanthropy$22kPublic Benefit$19kHealth$14kReligion$6kHousing & Shelter$5kArts & Culture$3kFood & Nutrition$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $43k
$2,404
Median grant
2
States reached
$328k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER$43,100
JEWISH FED OF GREATER WASHINGTON$2,500
WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION$2,404
Individual grant recipient$550
THE AVALON THEATRE PROJECT$150
WENDT CENTER$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION: $2k → 14%LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $100 → 9%MANNA FOOD CENTER: $3k → 8%GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%MAINTSTREET CONNECT: $5k → 8%WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION: $2k → 14%JEWISH FEDERATION: $3k → 8%Community Foundation (Power of Pink): $3k → 14%JEWISH FED OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $3k → 8%WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION: $2k → 14%JEWISH FED OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $2k → 8%WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION: $50 → 14%Jewish Federation: $2k → 8%THE AVALON THEATRE PROJECT: $150 → 14%SO WHAT ELSE: $1k → 8%NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER: $43k → 14%SO WHAT ELSE: $750 → 8%NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER: $37k → 14%HANDS OF LOVE: $175 → 8%Hope for Henry: $10k → 14%THE POWER OF PINK: $1k → 8%NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER: $10k → 14%DEVON C RUBINSTEIN FOUNDATION: $200 → 8%HOPE FOR HENRY: $3k → 14%ARTS AND HUMANITIES COUCIL OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $3k → 8%National Whistleblower Education and Defense Fund: $19k → 14%ENVERYMIND: $1k → 8%WENDT CENTER FOR LOSS AND HEALING: $125 → 14%SUE ANN SIEGEL: $550 → 8%WENDT CENTER: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115k · 5 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +216% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
12

Total granted

$115k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+216%
+16%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureCivil RightsPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NW
    NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER
    3× · 2022–2024 · $90k · revenue +216%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue -66%
  • WH
    WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $6k

Funded once

  • NW
    National Whistleblower Education and Defense Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
  • MS
    MAIN STREET CONNECT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -27%
  • MF
    MANNA FOOD CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Maryland Patient Safety Center Inc

To develop and implement strategies to improve the safety of patient care in maryland. mpsc unites stakeholders to champion patient safety, eliminate preventable harm, and accelerate improvements in safety quality across healthcare.

Health
3
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
4
Edlavitch Jewish Community Center of Washington Dc Inc

Guided by jewish values and heritage, the edlavitch dc jewish community center (edcjcc) engages individuals and families through its cultural, recreational, educational, and social justice programs by welcoming people of all backgrounds to…

—
5
Bender Jcc of Greater Washington

The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…

Human Services
6
Baltimore Museum of Art

The baltimore museum of art connects art to baltimore and baltimore to the world, embodying a commitment to artistic excellence and social equity in every decision from art presentation, interpretation, and collecting, to the composition…

Arts & Culture
7
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
8
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
9
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
10
The Goldenberg Family Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Children's National

Children's national coordinates the overall policy and activities of the affiliated organizations. see schedule o.

Health
12
The Young Men's and Young Women's Hebrew Association

For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Washington Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Beelzebubs Alumni Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER: $89,534 · Civil RightsNATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTERNational Whistleblower Education and Defense Fund: $19,164 · OtherNational Whistleblower Ed…WASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREGATION: $6,454 · OtherWASHINGTON HEBREW CONGREG…JEWISH FEDERATION: $4,300 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONCommunity Foundation (Power of Pink): $2,500 · OtherCommunity Foundation (Pow…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION+6 more: $2,900 · Other+6 moreTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $6,300 · PhilanthropyTHE JEWIS…GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER W…SO WHAT ELSE INC: $1,750 · PhilanthropySO WHAT E…HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $12,500 · Health+2 more: $300 · HealthMAIN STREET CONNECT INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL OF MONTGOMER: $2,500 · Arts & CultureBEELZEBUBS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $500 · Arts & CultureAVALON THEATRE PROJECT INC: $150 · Arts & CultureMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $2,500 · Food & Nutrition
Civil Rights$89,534Other$37,318Philanthropy$13,050Health$12,800Housing & Shelter$5,000Arts & Culture$3,150Food & Nutrition$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL WHISTLEBLOWER CENTER: $89,534 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $6,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAIN STREET CONNECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARTS AND HUMANITIES COUNCIL OF MONTGOMER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANNA FOOD CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSO WHAT ELSE INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBEELZEBUBS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDEVON C RUBENSTEIN FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVALON THEATRE PROJECT INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM WENDT CENTER FOR LOSS AND HEALING: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clark-Winchcole FoundationMD13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eric and Sueann Siegel Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eric and Sueann Siegel Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Manna Food Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eric and Sueann Siegel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph