Loading…
· Public charity
EPILEPSY ALLIANCE AMERICA INC
Provide programs and services to improve the lives of people living with epilepsy
$268k
Granted FY2024
14
Grants
11
Communities
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2024.
Health$253kHuman Services$116kOther$108k
02FY2024 · 14 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $231k
$17,350
Median grant
11
States reached
$559k
Total assets
Largest grants
- EPILEPSY ALLIANCE LOUISIANA$23,350
- EPILEPSY ADVOCACY NETWORK$20,100
- EPILEPSY SERVICES FOUNDATION$19,706
- SOCIEDAD PUERTORRIQUENA DE EP$19,683
- EPILEPSY SERVICES OF NEW JERS$18,396
- EMPOWERING PEOPLES INDEPENDE$17,980
- EPILEPSY SUPPORT NETWORK OF O$17,350
- EPILEPSY ALLIANCE FLORIDA$17,350
- EPILEPSY ASSOC OF WESTERN AN$17,350
- JOSHPROVIDES - EPILEPSY ASSIS$16,350
- EPILEPSY ALLIANCE NORTH CAROL$16,000
- EPILEPSY ALLIANCE OHIO$13,850
- VALLEY CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE$13,350
- SOUTH CAROLINA ADVOCATES FOR$9,100
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$477k · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else
14 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
14
0
Total granted
$477k
$0
Still filing today
100%
0%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthHuman ServicesOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EAEPILEPSY ADVOCACY NETWORK2× · 2023–2024 · $42k · revenue +1178%
- ESEPILEPSY SERVICES OF NEW JERS2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +104%
- EPEMPOWERING PEOPLES INDEPENDE2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +193%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Epilepsy Research Fund Inc
Philanthropy
2
Epilepsy Foundation of Southeast Tennessee
At the Epilepsy Foundation SETN, we are committed to helping people in Tennessee and Northwest Georgia affected by seizures and epilepsy. We recognize that a diagnosis of epilepsy is life-changing, and our mission is to raise awareness,…
Health
3
Epilepsy Foundation of Georgia
The mission of the epilepsy foundation of georgia is to lead the fight to overcome the challenges of living with epilepsy and to accelerate therapies to stop seizures, find cures, and save lives.
—
4
Epilepsy Foundation of Northeastern New
The epilepsy foundation leads the fight to stop seizures, find a cure and overcome the challenges created by epilepsy.
—
5
Epilepsy Foundation of Eastern Pa
The efepa leads the fight to stop seizures, find a cure and overcome challenges created by epilepsy in eastern pa.
—
6
Epilepsy Institute of North Carolina
We are providing services for patients with epilepsy in our community.
—
7
Epilepsy Foundation of Texas
Epilepsy foundation texas exists to improve the lives of people affected by epilepsy through education, advocacy, research and connection.
Health
8
Epilepsy Study Consortium Inc
Accelerating the development of new therapies in epilepsy to improve patient care through research.
Health
9
Epilepsy Services of Southwest Florida
Organization provides case management services to uninsured individuals over the age of 18 who are diagnosed with epilepsy. additionally, they offer community education and family support services to raise awareness and educate the…
Health
10
Epilepsy Research Foundation
A supporting organization of the epilepsy foundation to facilitate efforts to develop innovative research
Philanthropy
11
Epilepsy Society of Kern County
Health
12
Epilepsy Foundation of Greater
To provide information, public education, residential, recreational and case management services to persons with epilepsy and other developmental disabilities.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Epilepsy Support Network and the most unlike its peers is Valley Children's Healthcare. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$252,566Human Services$116,099Other$107,900
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EPILEPSY ADVOCACY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY SERVICES OF NEW JERS ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY ALLIANCE LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERING PEOPLES INDEPENDE ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY ALLIANCE NORTH CAROL ↗
- Who funds SOCIEDAD PUERTORRIQUENA DE EP ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY ASSOC OF WESTERN AN ↗
- Who funds VALLEY CHILDRENS HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY ALLIANCE FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY ALLIANCE OHIO ↗
- Who funds JOSHPROVIDES - EPILEPSY ASSIS ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY SUPPORT NETWORK OF O ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA ADVOCATES FOR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Network for GoodDC8.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation EPILEPSY ALLIANCE AMERICA INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
- Epilepsy Florida Inc — 66% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOUTH CAROLINA ADVOCATES FOR.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.9× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 451453429 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on SOUTH CAROLINA ADVOCATES FOR, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Epilepsy Alliance America Inc?
Find your warmest path to Epilepsy Alliance America Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines