Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Epic Foundation Inc

To support charitable and non-governmental organizations, including but not limited to those focused on child development and welfare and the defense of the planet, either through contributions or by direct financial, technical, or managerial assistance.

$401k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.3MHealth$711kCrime & Legal$634kInternational$331kHousing & Shelter$260kHuman Services$110kYouth Development$95kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $176,001 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $400,701 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $224,700 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$117k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JED FOUNDATION$61,001
COMMON JUSTICE$45,000
STRONGMINDS INC$30,000
KIDOGO EARLY YEARS INC$20,000
LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PIVOTAL: $20k → 11%THE BOTTOM LINE INC: $50k → 16%PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $100k → 8%LIVING GOODS: $50k → 10%HAVEN HOUSE: $110k → 13%THE JED FOUNDATION: $113k → 17%COMMONLIT INC: $168k → 14%NYAKA AIDS ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $225k → 16%LWALA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $20k → 14%NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $50k → 12%KIDOGO EARLY YEARS INC: $20k → 16%SPARK PROGRAM: $20k → 14%STRONGMINDS INC: $90k → 16%PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $75k → 8%LIVING GOODS: $25k → 10%THE JED FOUNDATION: $103k → 17%COMMONLIT INC: $150k → 14%NYAKA AIDS ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $35k → 16%NURSE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $30k → 12%STRONGMINDS INC: $30k → 16%TEENFORCE: $38k → 8%FIRST GRADUATE: $37k → 10%THE JED FOUNDATION: $100k → 17%COMMONLIT INC: $140k → 14%STRONGMINDS INC: $10k → 16%THE JED FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%COMMONLIT INC: $114k → 14%NEW CLASSROOMS: $169k → 17%COMMONLIT INC: $75k → 14%THE ALI FORNEY CENTER: $150k → 17%EVIDENCE ACTION INC: $51k → 14%NEW CLASSROOMS: $138k → 17%NEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS: $60k → 17%ALI FORNEY CENTER: $60k → 17%ALI FORNEY CENTER: $50k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $109k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 17%LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 17%SCIPTED: $37k → 17%SCRIPTED: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CA
CO
AZ
TN
DC

Grants abroad, by region — $225k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$160k · 71% · 5 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT

South Asia$45k · 20% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT

East Asia and the Pacific$20k · 9% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.1M · 12 repeat orgs$366k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$3.1M
$326k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationHealthPhilanthropySocial ScienceCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    COMMONLIT INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $647k · revenue +141%
  • TJ
    THE JED FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $426k · revenue +58%
  • LF
    LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $309k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CA
    CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ERIE COUNTY
    one grant, 2019 · $110k · revenue -15%
  • EA
    EVIDENCE ACTION
    one grant, 2018 · $51k · revenue +1%
  • TB
    THE BOTTOM LINE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +69%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
2
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
3
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
4
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
5
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

6
Open New York Education Inc

Open new york education, inc. supports public education, awareness, and engagement around housing issues to help build a movement for a more abundant and inclusive new york.

Housing & Shelter
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
9
Partnership On Ai to Benefit People and Society

Bringing diverse voices together across global sectors, disciplines, and demographics so developments in ai advance positive outcomes for people and society.

Science & Tech
10
Onegoal

Onegoal (the organization") is a nonprofit organization incorporated on june 13, 2003 to provide underserved students with the resources, support, and network to earn a postsecondary degree.

Youth Development
11
Firelight Foundation

Firelight supports catalytic community-based organizations in eastern and southern africa that work with their own communities to realize shared visions of sustainable change and true potential for children and youth.

International
12
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence Action and the most unlike its peers is Child and Family Services of Erie County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMONLIT INC — $646,793 · EducationCOMMONLIT INCNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC — $367,023 · EducationNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS…SCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION — $51,800 · EducationTHE JED FOUNDATION — $426,001 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATI…NURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $80,000 · HealthNURSE-FAMILY PAR…PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $175,000 · OtherPIVOTAL CONNECTIONSCHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ERIE COUNTY — $110,000 · OtherCHILD AND FAMILY SERVIC…TEENFORCE — $37,800 · OtherNYAKA INC — $259,800 · OtherNYAKA INCTHE BOTTOM LINE INC — $50,000 · OtherTHE BOTTOM LINE INCFIRST GRADUATE — $36,700 · Other+3 more — $60,000 · Other+3 moreCOMMON JUSTICE INC — $325,000 · Social ScienceCOMMON JUS…LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $309,192 · Crime & LegalLAWYERS FO…STRONGMINDS INC — $130,000 · InternationalSTRONGMIN…LIVING GOODS — $75,000 · InternationalLIVING GO…EVIDENCE ACTION — $51,394 · InternationalEVIDENCE …Lwala Community Alliance — $20,000 · InternationalLwala Com…ALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $260,000 · Housing & Shelter
Education$1,065,616Health$506,001Other$729,300Social Science$325,000Crime & Legal$309,192International$276,394Housing & Shelter$260,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMONLIT INC — $646,793 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $426,001 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNEW CLASSROOMS INNOVATION PARTNERS INC — $367,023 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMON JUSTICE INC — $325,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $309,192 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC — $260,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNYAKA INC — $259,800 over 2y, 13% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $175,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSTRONGMINDS INC — $130,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF ERIE COUNTY — $110,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNURSE-FAMILY PARTNERSHIP — $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING GOODS — $75,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSCRIPTED INC DBA CODE NATION — $51,800 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetEVIDENCE ACTION — $51,394 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEENFORCE — $37,800 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetKidogo Early Years Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPIVOTAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPARK PROGRAM INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLwala Community Alliance — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA20.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Mulago Foundation · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · National Philanthropic Trust · Robin Hood Foundation · Gates Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Tides Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jewish Communal Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Epic Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • The Bottom Line Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Epic Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Epic Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph