· Public charity
Enterprise Community Loan Fund Inc
To deliver innovative financial products and technical assistance to organizations to acquire, develop, and preserve quality affordable housing and to revitalize communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $82k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CJG LLC | $200,000 |
| TOC ENTERPRISES | $200,000 |
| A & D QUALITY CONSTRUCTION CO | $175,000 |
| ALPHA SHARP DEVELOPMENT CO LLC | $150,000 |
| QUALITY DEVELOPMENT LLC | $141,290 |
| MARLEX CP | $100,000 |
| WILTRUST GROUP | $100,000 |
| CUNNINGHAM LEGACY LOFTS | $50,000 |
| LIVING DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS | $50,000 |
| SEATTLE YMCA | $50,000 |
| DISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING (DASH) | $50,000 |
| ERCPCP | $50,000 |
| LITTLE LIGHTS URBAN MINISTRIES | $40,000 |
| DYNAMIC SOLUTIONS FOR THE AGING | $30,000 |
| HILOA | $11,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $810k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $671k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TYTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871)3× · 2022–2024 · $300k · revenue +37%
- BABE A HELPING HAND2× · 2022–2023 · $250k · revenue +151%
- LLLittle Lights Urban Ministries Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $81k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- AHAWA HOLDINGS LLCone grant, 2022 · $354k
- AEAGORSOR EQUITYone grant, 2023 · $300k
- MRMEDICI ROADgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +169% · 32% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Housing help plus is a community development organization that specializes in affordable housing development and management with a secondary focus on urban agriculture projects that benefit the community.
The mission of affordable housing opportunities, inc. (aho) is to develop, own and manage low income housing for the very poorest of the washington, dc metropolitan area.
Npcdc's mission is to initate, sponsor and operate housing and economic development projects that create economic stability and upward mobility for low-income families in metropolitan washington, dc.
Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.
Development of affordable housing
Develop, preserve and operate affordable housing for low and moderate- income households and provde services to residents to maintain housing stability, improve quality of life and break the cycle of poverty.
Our mission is focused on urban revitalization by providing affordable, vibrant, multi-family housing for low- and moderate-income individuals and families. we offer rental units throughout pinellas county at and below market rates to…
House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…
Habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an affiliate of the americus-based habitat for humanity international. habitat for humanity of northwest metro atlanta, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry dedicated to…
To advocate fair housing and improving tenant/landlord relations.
Founded in 1975, ahc develops affordable housing and helps communities thrive in the northern virginia, washington dc and the baltimore region. we provide a wide array of educational programs and social services in our community centers to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medici Road and the most unlike its peers is National Alliance of Pan African Seminarians. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds MEDICI ROAD ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST EFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds BE A HELPING HAND ↗
- Who funds HOUSING INITIATIVE PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds East African Community Services ↗
- Who funds FIRST AME HOUSING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICATOWN COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY BUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds TRUE GROUND HOUSING PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds HILAO Housing ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE OF URBAN LIVING ↗
- Who funds Little Lights Urban Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NONPROFIT DEVELOPERS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF PAN AFRICAN SEMINARIANS ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAGNA CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Capital Impact Partners · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Stolte Family Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Inatai Foundation · United Way of King County · Seattle Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Enterprise Community Loan Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Paul's Place Inc — 29% of income from government
- Housing Initiative Partnership Inc — 21% of income from government
- The Community Builders Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.