Skip to content
Enloe Medical Center at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Enloe Medical Center

The mission of ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER is to elevate the health of our communities.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.2MEducation$148kFood & Nutrition$56kYouth Development$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $167,888, the rows itemized in this filing. The $181,490 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,602 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $46k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $116k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUTTE-GLENN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT$65,588
ENLOE FOUNDATION$50,000
CHICO STATE ENTERPRISES$45,600
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTH VALLEY$6,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Stop Hunger Now: $26k → 10%SHASTA REGIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%CHICO STATE ENTERPRISES: $46k → 18%CHICO STATE ENTERPRISES: $39k → 18%CHICO STATE ENTERPRISES: $33k → 18%CSU CHICO RESEARCH FOUNDAITON: $32k → 18%CSU CHICO RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $30k → 18%JESUS PROVIDES OUR DAILY BREAD: $20k → 18%JESUS PROVIDES OUR DAILY BREAD: $12k → 18%BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTH VALLEY: $10k → 18%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTH VALLEY: $10k → 18%NORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTH VALLEY: $7k → 18%ENLOE FOUNDATION: $150k → 18%ENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $120k → 18%ENLOE FOUNDATION: $108k → 18%ENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $61k → 18%ENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $56k → 18%ENLOE FOUNDATION: $50k → 18%BUTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $66k → 18%BUTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $66k → 18%BUTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $66k → 18%BUTTE-GLENN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $66k → 18%Butte Community College District: $66k → 18%BUTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $66k → 18%BUTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $66k → 18%BUTTE-GLENN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $66k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 7 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+162%

Still filing today

57%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EH
    ENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2025 · $543k · revenue +16%
  • CS
    Chico State Enterprises
    6× · 2018–2025 · $178k · revenue +104%
  • JP
    JESUS PROVIDES OUR DAILY BREAD DBA JESUS CENTER
    3× · 2020–2023 · $32k · revenue +178%

Funded once

  • RISE AGAINST HUNGER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $26k · revenue +162%
  • Catalyst Domestic Violence Services
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
2
Community Action Agency of Butte County Inc

To improve the economic security and well-being of low-income residents of Butte County and our surrounding service area through diverse housing, human service programs and community collaborations.

—
3
California Life Sciences Association

Clsa advances californias world-leading life sciences innovation ecosystem by advocating for effective national, state and local public policies and supporting entrepreneurs and life sciences businesses.

Community Improvement
4
Butte Emergency Food Bank

Provide food for individuals in need

—
5
Cascade Climate Inc

To accelerate progress in interventions that harness Earths natural systems to stabilize the climate.

Environment
6
Community Foundation of Northern Nevada

To strengthen our community through philanthropy and leadership by connecting people who care with causes that matter.

Philanthropy
7
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
8
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
9
Central Valley Business Federation

To strengthen the voice of business in Californias Central Valley through information sharing expertise networking connections and research to impact economic policies programs and projects.

Community Improvement
10
CalCef Innovations

Optimizing the clean energy transition - 100%+ clean energy economy for the 100%.

Environment
11
New Energy Nexus Enventure

Support rural cooperatives and community-based organizations in uganda working on clean energy initiatives

Community Improvement
12
Northern California Grantmakers

regions most pressing social issues. We pool resources, share information, work together, and learn from each other. NCG recognizes that the challenges facing our communities are complex, entrenched and interconnected.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Valley Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is In Situ Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BUTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT: $393,528 · OtherBUTTE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTBUTTE-GLENN CCD: $131,176 · OtherBUTTE-GLENN CCDIN SITU FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherIN SITU FOUNDATIONJESUS PROVIDES OUR DAILY BREAD DBA JESUS CENTER: $32,200 · OtherENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $543,300 · HealthENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATIONChico State Enterprises: $178,450 · EducationChico State En…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTH VALLEY: $26,700 · Youth DevelopmentRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $26,271 · InternationalNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NORTH STATE: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCatalyst Domestic Violence Services: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$636,904Health$543,300Education$178,450Youth Development$26,700International$26,271Philanthropy$20,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENLOE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $543,300 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetChico State Enterprises: $178,450 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetIN SITU FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetJESUS PROVIDES OUR DAILY BREAD DBA JESUS CENTER: $32,200 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE NORTH VALLEY: $26,700 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCatalyst Domestic Violence Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NORTH STATE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Valley Communit…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
North Valley Community FoundationCA17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Valley Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enloe Medical Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enloe Medical Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Enloe Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home