Skip to content

· Private foundation

Engelhardt Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$520k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.8MArts & Culture$1.5MHealth$577kFood & Nutrition$70kHuman Services$25kAnimals$20kCommunity Improvement$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $187k
  • $250k+2 grants · $771k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - TRULASKE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS$520,325
SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION$250,756
ILLINOIS RURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION$70,000
ST LOUIS ARC$66,000
NATIONAL CHILDRENS CANCER SOCIETY$50,962
JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL$40,000
COMMUNITY SCHOOL - ST LOUIS$17,500
LINCOLN LAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,000
ABC TO CEO$10,000
CASA OF ST LOUIS$5,000
NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN$3,790
CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA$2,500
GOOD & GLORY FOUNDATION$2,500
MISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$1,000
PINCKNEYVILLE FIREMENS ASSOCIATION$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES: $10k → 11%PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES: $5k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $66k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $25k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $25k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $25k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $25k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OH
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 33 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
19

Total granted

$3.9M
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+17%

Still filing today

52%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $982k · revenue +43%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2020–2023 · $300k · revenue +16%
  • SL
    ST LOUIS ARC INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $191k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR PINCKNEYVILLEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +503% · 78% of their budget
  • SI
    SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $11k · revenue +105%
  • Best Buddies International Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
2
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
3
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
4
St Louis Community Foundation

To promote the possibilities of charitable giving, helping charitable citizens understand how they can effectively provide for the community they love and the causes they care deeply about.

Philanthropy
5
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
6
Jefferson Regional Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to improve the health and well-being of the communities served by jefferson hospital through engagement, community-driven research and grantmaking. there are three grantmaking priorities focused on the…

Health
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
8
Missouri Historical Society

The missouri historical society (mhs) is a missouri pro forma decree, not-for-profit corporation whose primary functions are educational and community programs; collections and conservation; library and research; and exhibitions.…

Arts & Culture
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation Fighting Blindness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
20/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - TRULASKE COLLEGE OF BUSINESS: $1,261,134 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - TRULASKE COLLEGE OF BUSINESSTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $323,579 · OtherTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETYILLINOIS RURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Other+42 more: $316,788 · Other+42 moreTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $982,379 · Arts & CultureTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATIONOpera Theatre of Saint Louis: $403,914 · Arts & CultureOpera Theatre of Saint LouisILLINOIS RURAL HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $108,283 · Arts & CultureILLINOIS RURAL HERITAGE MUSEUM INC+1 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $300,000 · EducationWASHINGTON…JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $40,000 · EducationJOHN BURRO…ABC TO CEO LTD: $30,000 · EducationABC TO CEO…+4 more: $21,997 · Education+4 moreST LOUIS ARC INC: $191,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $14,642 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $7,819 · HealthMISSOURI BAPTIST HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $605 · HealthFOUNDATION FOR PINCKNEYVILLE: $19,750 · Community ImprovementBest Buddies International Inc: $10,000 · International
Other$1,971,501Arts & Culture$1,497,576Education$391,997Human Services$206,000Health$24,066Community Improvement$19,750International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION: $982,379 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetOpera Theatre of Saint Louis: $403,914 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY: $323,579 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $300,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS ARC INC: $191,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL: $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABC TO CEO LTD: $30,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR PINCKNEYVILLE: $19,750 over 1y, 78% of budgetAlmost Home: $15,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $14,642 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $11,497 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGREAT CIRCLE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $7,819 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST CHARLES COUNTY: $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCASA OF ST LOUIS: $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $6,390 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASA of Williamson County Texas: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSouthwest Florida Music Education Center Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI ENERGYCARE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSPECIAL EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $605 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Thresherman Assoc Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFANATICS ALL IN FOUNDATION: $1 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE SHELDON ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Opera Theatre of Saint Louis ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CANCER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS RURAL HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN BURROUGHS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ABC TO CEO LTD ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR PINCKNEYVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Almost Home ↗
  • Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE PROPERTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PINK RIBBON GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GREAT CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds Best Buddies International Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST CHARLES COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Williamson County Texas ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds Southwest Florida Music Education Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI ENERGYCARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Pott Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Pershing Charitable Trust · Ameren Charitable Trust (Union Electric

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Engelhardt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Engelhardt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Engelhardt Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Engelhardt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Engelhardt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph