Skip to content
End Domestic Abuse Wisconsin the Wi Coalition Against Domestic Violence at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

End Domestic Abuse Wisconsin the Wi Coalition Against Domestic Violence

End domestic abuse wisconsin: the wisconsin coalition against domestic violence (end abuse) is a statewide, non-profit membership organization of battered women, formerly battered women, domestic abuse programs, and individuals committed to ending domestic violence.through partnerships and strategic collaborations and education,…

$748k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$116k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$1.5MHealth$1.0MPublic Benefit$346kEmployment$146kEducation$47kCrime & Legal$29kReligion$6k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $575,888, the rows itemized in this filing. The $747,933 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $172,045 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$90,405
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WE ALL RISE AFRICAN AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER INC$116,274
CIA SIAB INC$110,884
HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOC$90,405
UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INC$88,030
DIVERSE AND RESILIENT$87,862
WISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC$82,433
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER OF RACINE INC: $28k → 10%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $30k → 10%CIA SIAB INC: $111k → 12%HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOC: $90k → 17%FAMILY SUPPORT & RESOURCE CENTER: $62k → 12%UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INC: $88k → 10%CIA SIAB INC: $82k → 12%HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOC: $75k → 17%UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INC: $82k → 10%CIA SIAB INC: $79k → 12%HMONG AMERICAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $63k → 17%UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INC: $79k → 10%CIA SAB INC: $72k → 12%HMONG AMERICAN WOMENS ASSOCIATION: $55k → 17%UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INC: $70k → 10%CIA SIAB INC: $71k → 12%HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOC: $53k → 17%UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INC: $53k → 10%CIA SIAB INC: $65k → 12%HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOC: $51k → 17%UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INC: $46k → 10%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE: $15k → 17%FAMILY SUPPORT & RESOURCE CENTER: $62k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 9 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$2.9M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+57%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationEmploymentCrime & LegalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CIA SIAB INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $480k · revenue +242%
  • DIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $454k · revenue +28%
  • WW
    WISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $433k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • DA
    DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +47%
  • RC
    REACH COUNSELING SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $29k · revenue +120%
  • WR
    WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF RACINE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $28k · revenue +150%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Information Services Inc

To provide advocacy, safety options and support services to survivors of domestic violence and adult sexual assault.

Human Services
2
The Women's Center Inc

To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.

Human Services
3
Women and Children's Horizons Inc

The mission of women and children's horizons, inc. is to provide support, shelter, education, training, and healing services to victims of sexual and domestic abuse, their families, and the community.

Human Services
4
Women's Aid Service Inc

To provide safety and empowerment to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and to work to eliminate sexual victimization and domestic violence through shelter, treatment, education and social change.

Crime & Legal
5
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
6
Wrc Inc

The women's resource center's mission is to eliminate domestic violence and sexual assault abuse through advocacy, education, system change, and empowering services to all surviors. the center provides sexual assault and domestic violence…

—
7
Advocacy Center of Winona

The advocacy center of winona's mission is to end domestic and sexual violence in winona county.

—
8
Womenspace

Our mission is to protect, shelter, and empower survivors of domestic violence - offering safety, support, and resources with compassion and trauma-informed care.

Human Services
9
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
10
Wisconsin Rapids Family Center Inc

Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.

—
11
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
12
My Sister's Place of Madison Inc

My sister's place, inc. is a non-profit agency that promotes domestic peace and safety through advocacy, support, and community education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hir Wellness Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cia Siab Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
18/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CIA SIAB INC: $480,228 · Human ServicesCIA SIAB INCUNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES UMOS INC: $418,740 · Human ServicesUNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES UMOS INCHmong American Womens Association Inc: $387,245 · Human ServicesHmong American Womens Association IncFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $123,859 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER+3 more: $73,329 · Human ServicesDIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC: $453,586 · HealthDIVERSE AND RESILIENT INCWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC: $433,133 · HealthWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INCNEW HORIZONS SHELTER AND OUTREACH CENTERS INC: $119,025 · HealthNEW HORIZONS SHELTER AND OUTREACH CEN…+2 more: $11,784 · HealthWE ALL RISE AFRICAN AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER INC: $346,317 · Public BenefitWE ALL RISE …HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC: $145,931 · EmploymentLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $24,360 · EducationLITERACY NETWORK INC: $22,500 · EducationREACH COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $29,279 · Crime & LegalTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $19,523 · Community ImprovementMUSLIM WOMEN'S COALITION INC: $6,000 · Religion
Human Services$1,483,401Health$1,017,528Public Benefit$346,317Employment$145,931Education$46,860Crime & Legal$29,279Community Improvement$19,523Religion$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCIA SIAB INC: $480,228 over 6y, 13% of budgetDIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC: $453,586 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC: $433,133 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetUNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES UMOS INC: $418,740 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetHmong American Womens Association Inc: $387,245 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetWE ALL RISE AFRICAN AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER INC: $346,317 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC: $145,931 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $123,859 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetNEW HORIZONS SHELTER AND OUTREACH CENTERS INC: $119,025 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $29,791 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetREACH COUNSELING SERVICES INC: $29,279 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC: $24,360 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK INC: $22,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $19,523 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC: $15,380 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSLIM WOMEN'S COALITION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHIR WELLNESS INSTITUTE INC: $5,784 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers Fou…Otto Bremer TrustGreater Milwaukee Fou…United Way of Greater…Herbert H Kohl Charit…US Ventureschmidt Fam…Baird Foundation IncCommunity Foundation …Tides FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…Ge Aerospace Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …
Green Bay Packers FoundationWI25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Tides Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization End Domestic Abuse Wisconsin the Wi Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from End Domestic Abuse Wisconsin the Wi Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on End Domestic Abuse Wisconsin the Wi Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home