· Public charity
End Domestic Abuse Wisconsin the Wi Coalition Against Domestic Violence
End domestic abuse wisconsin: the wisconsin coalition against domestic violence (end abuse) is a statewide, non-profit membership organization of battered women, formerly battered women, domestic abuse programs, and individuals committed to ending domestic violence.through partnerships and strategic collaborations and education,…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $575,888 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $747,933 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $172,045 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WE ALL RISE AFRICAN AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER INC | $116,274 |
| CIA SIAB INC | $110,884 |
| HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOC | $90,405 |
| UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES INC | $88,030 |
| DIVERSE AND RESILIENT | $87,862 |
| WISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC | $82,433 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCIA SIAB INC6× · 2019–2024 · $480k · revenue +242%
DIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC6× · 2019–2024 · $454k · revenue +28%- WWWISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $433k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- DADOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $30k · revenue +47%
- RCREACH COUNSELING SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $29k · revenue +120%
- WRWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF RACINE INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $28k · revenue +150%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide advocacy, safety options and support services to survivors of domestic violence and adult sexual assault.
To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.
The mission of women and children's horizons, inc. is to provide support, shelter, education, training, and healing services to victims of sexual and domestic abuse, their families, and the community.
To provide safety and empowerment to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and to work to eliminate sexual victimization and domestic violence through shelter, treatment, education and social change.
The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.
The women's resource center's mission is to eliminate domestic violence and sexual assault abuse through advocacy, education, system change, and empowering services to all surviors. the center provides sexual assault and domestic violence…
The advocacy center of winona's mission is to end domestic and sexual violence in winona county.
Our mission is to protect, shelter, and empower survivors of domestic violence - offering safety, support, and resources with compassion and trauma-informed care.
The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.
Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.
Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.
My sister's place, inc. is a non-profit agency that promotes domestic peace and safety through advocacy, support, and community education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hir Wellness Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cia Siab Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CIA SIAB INC ↗
- Who funds DIVERSE AND RESILIENT INC ↗
- Who funds WISE WOMEN GATHERING PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED MIGRANT OPPORTUNITY SERVICES UMOS INC ↗
- Who funds Hmong American Womens Association Inc ↗
- Who funds WE ALL RISE AFRICAN AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE DOMESTIC ABUSE PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS SHELTER AND OUTREACH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds REACH COUNSELING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF RACINE INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY SERVICES OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE OF MILWAUKEE INC ↗
- Who funds GERALD L IGNACE INDIAN HEALTH CENTER I ↗
- Who funds MUSLIM WOMEN'S COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds HIR WELLNESS INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · US Ventureschmidt Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Tides Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization End Domestic Abuse Wisconsin the Wi Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.