Skip to content
Ena Zucchi Tuw at a glance

· Private foundation

Ena Zucchi Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Youth Development$31kEducation$30kHealth$16kReligion$13kHuman Services$8kHousing & Shelter$5kPublic Benefit$5kFood & Nutrition$3k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$301k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER LIFE INC$5,000
CANEY CREEK COMMUNITY CENTER$2,500
GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY$2,500
OVERLOOK FOUNDATION$2,500
FELICIAN UNIVERSITY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOUGHMAIN FINANCIAL LITERACY FDN: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$76k · 9 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +44% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$76k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GREATER LIFE INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $22k · revenue +76%
  • FELICIAN UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +14%
  • AL
    ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE
    3× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • AA
    AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -12%
  • ISLES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +31%
  • YG
    YOUR GRANDMOTHERS CUPBOARD
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
2
University of Saint Joseph

The university provides a rigorous liberal arts and professional education for a diverse student population. (see schedule o for the organization's mission.)

Education
3
Saint Michael's College

It is the mission of saint michael's college to contribute through higher education to the enhancement of the human person and to the advancement of human culture in the light of the catholic faith.

Education
4
Monmouth University Inc

See schedule omonmouth university is a comprehensive institution of higher education committed to excellence and integrity in teaching, scholarship and service. through its offerings in liberal arts, sciences, and professional programs,…

Education
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
St Mary's University

St. marys university, as a catholic marianist university, fosters the formation of people in faith and educates leaders for the common good through community, integrated liberal arts and professional education, and academic excellence.

—
7
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
8
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
9
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
10
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
11
Alvernia University

Alvernia university is a catholic comprehensive university with a liberal arts foundation founded by the bernardine franciscan sisters in 1958. see continuation on schedule o.

—
12
Siena University

Siena university is a learning community advancing the ideals of a liberal arts education, rooted in its identity as a franciscan and catholic institution. as a learning community, siena is committed to a student-centered education…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Peter's University; the most unlike its peers is Juvenile Education & Awareness Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER LIFE INC: $10,000 · OtherGREATER LIFE INCOVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherOVERLOOK FOUNDATIONAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS: $5,000 · OtherAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARSFOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTEREDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TABERNACLE TWP: $3,000 · OtherEDUCATION FOUNDATION OF TABERNACLE TWPSETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITYDoughMain Financial Literacy Foundation Inc: $3,000 · OtherDoughMain Financial Literacy Foundation …CAMDEN CITY GARDEN CLUB INC: $2,750 · OtherCAMDEN CITY GARDEN CLUB INCFELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $10,500 · EducationFELICIAN UNIVERSITYALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationALICE LLOYD COLLEGEGEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationGEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITYSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY: $2,750 · EducationSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITYGREATER LIFE INC: $21,500 · Recreation & SportsGREATER LIFE INCOVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $5,250 · HealthOVERLOOK F…Foundation for Morristown Medical Center: $5,250 · HealthFoundation…ISLES INC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterYOUR GRANDMOTHERS CUPBOARD: $5,000 · Public BenefitJuvenile Education & Awareness Project: $4,000 · Youth Development
Other$39,250Education$24,250Recreation & Sports$21,500Health$10,500Housing & Shelter$5,000Public Benefit$5,000Youth Development$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER LIFE INC: $21,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetFELICIAN UNIVERSITY: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISLES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUR GRANDMOTHERS CUPBOARD: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJuvenile Education & Awareness Project: $4,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetDoughMain Financial Literacy Foundation Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT PETER'S UNIVERSITY: $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Provident Bank Fo…E and S Van Houten Me…John a and Margaret P…Pseg Foundation IncInvestors Foundation …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Provident Bank FoundationNJ15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Provident Bank Foundation · E and S Van Houten Memorial Fund · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · Pseg Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ena Zucchi Tuw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ena Zucchi Tuw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Isles Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Georgian Court University: 1% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University: 1% of income from government
  • Saint Peter's University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ena Zucchi Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home