Skip to content

· Public charity

EMT Action Fund

The primary mission of the EMT ACTION FUND is to create a long term and sustainable model of jewish education and giving.

$8.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
62
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$8.7MPhilanthropy$805kCivil Rights$90kHuman Services$90kHealth$48kInternational$37kCommunity Improvement$30kYouth Development$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 62 grants below total $4,175,590, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,232,239 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,056,649 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k39 grants · $667k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.0M
$20,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$50M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RDOVID$1,000,000
OIZ VEHUDOR$650,000
JYRC$322,000
YESHIVAS DARCHEI TORAH$234,040
KEREN OLAM HATORAH$200,000
BIRCHAS YITZCHOK DBONHAD$111,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA$100,000
LONG ISLAND JEWISH CENTER$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
YESHIVAS BIRKAS SHOLOM$90,000
YESHIVA GEDOLAH FIVE TOWNS$71,000
HACHAIM VEHASHALOM INC$68,000
BEIS HAMEDRASH ISHEI YISROEL$51,000
YESHIVA NISHMAS HATORAH$50,000
GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $146k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $6k → 6%ZICHRON MATTEL: $25k → 11%ZICHRON MATTEL: $25k → 11%NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $12k → 11%LAKEWOOD KESHER: $10k → 11%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $12k → 20%MY EXTENDED FAMILY: $12k → 20%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE: $12k → 6%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE: $12k → 6%ACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CTR: $10k → 6%BONEI OLAM: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $4.0M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$4.0M · 100% · 9 grants

Stated purpose: RELIGIOUS EDUCATION

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 43 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
33

Total granted

$6.3M
$781k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+81%

Still filing today

28%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MK
    MOSDOS KEVER RACHEL IMEINU
    2× · 2020–2021 · $337k · revenue +91%
  • KH
    KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST
    4× · 2020–2023 · $254k · revenue +144%
  • TC
    Torah Center For Higher Rabbinical Studies Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $225k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BAIS SHALOM INC
    one grant, 2021 · $135k
  • YS
    YESHIVA SHEARITH HAPLETAH
    one grant, 2020 · $61k
  • O
    OFAKIM
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
Shaare Mordechai Inc

The organization's primary mission is charitable and religious in nature, supporting judaic and rabbinical education by providing financial assistance to institutions of jewish learning, currently through grants to shaare mordechai in…

Religion
5
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
6
Keren Hayeshivot Fund Inc

Keren hayeshivot fund supports religious institutions of higher education in the united states and israel to raise the level of torah and halachic observance in the sephardic orthodox jewish community.

Philanthropy
7
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
8
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
9
Yeshiva Knesseth Yisroel

To provide financial support to the yeshiva knesseth yisroel institution, its rabbis, and students, and lend support to other religious institutions in israel and around the world, with the goal of furthering jewish values among the jewish…

Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
11
Sherit Isroel
—
12
Birchas Yaakov Kollel Inc

Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aish Global Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ohr Olam Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RDOVID: $1,000,000 · OtherRDOVIDOIZ VEHUDER: $900,000 · OtherOIZ VEHUDERJYRC: $878,000 · OtherJYRCYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH RABBI'S FUND: $572,000 · OtherYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH RABBI'S FUNDYESHIVAS DARCHEI TORAH: $409,040 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH OF THE FIVE TOWNS INC: $258,200 · Other+76 more: $3,698,190 · Other+76 moreMAALOT: $800,000 · ReligionMAALOTMOSDOS KEVER RACHEL IMEINU: $337,000 · ReligionMOSDOS KEVER RACH…Torah Center For Higher Rabbinical Studies Inc: $225,000 · ReligionTorah Center For …GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $88,000 · ReligionGATEWAYS ORGANIZA…+4 more: $116,000 · Religion+4 moreKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $254,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMACHON YISRAEL TRUST: $16,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $5,400 · PhilanthropyZichron Mattel Inc: $50,000 · Human ServicesACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $33,600 · Human ServicesMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesTHE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesLAKEWOOD KESHER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $5,900 · Human ServicesBAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM: $50,000 · EducationBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $50,000 · EducationINSTITUTE FOR JEWISH CONTINUITY INC: $12,000 · EducationCHAI LIFELINE INC: $38,000 · HealthSTAND FOR AMERICA INC: $30,000 · Community Improvement
Other$7,715,430Religion$1,566,000Philanthropy$300,400Human Services$145,500Education$112,000Health$38,000Community Improvement$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAALOT: $800,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMOSDOS KEVER RACHEL IMEINU: $337,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $254,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetTorah Center For Higher Rabbinical Studies Inc: $225,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetGATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC: $88,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetZichron Mattel Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $38,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $33,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCAMP MORASHA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSTAND FOR AMERICA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY EXTENDED FAMILY INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Koidenov Inc: $22,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetTRADERS4ACAUSE: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetOhr Olam Corp: $18,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAISH GLOBAL INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUR PLACE INC: $13,600 over 1y, 56% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JEWISH CONTINUITY INC: $12,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetTHE NETZACH FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAKEWOOD KESHER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $5,900 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGESHARIM INC: $5,400 over 1y, 7.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MAALOT ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOS KEVER RACHEL IMEINU ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Torah Center For Higher Rabbinical Studies Inc ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAYS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ATERES MIRIAM ↗
  • Who funds Zichron Mattel Inc ↗
  • Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY48× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Maalot · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Astar Foundation Inc · Alyad Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Otzar Hachesed Foundation Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization EMT Action Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from EMT Action Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 80%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on EMT Action’s filings →

    More from the funding graph