Skip to content

· Private foundation

Empty Bowls Cook County

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$84k
Granted FY2023
23
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Food & Nutrition$130kHuman Services$25kEducation$19kReligion$5kYouth Development$5kHealth$3k
02FY2023 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Great Lunch$6,000
Step-Up ChildCare$5,000
North Point$5,000
Oshki Ogimaag Community School$5,000
Birch Grove Community School$5,000
Birch Grove Community School$5,000
Ruby's Pantry$5,000
YMCA$5,000
YMCA$5,000
Empty Bowls CC-MN$4,671
Cook County Community Education$4,000
YMCA$4,000
Cook County Council on Aging$3,500
Cooperation Station Day Care$3,000
Cook County Public Health & Human Services$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Care Partners of Cook County: $3k → 9%Violence Prevention Center: $2k → 9%Violence Prevention Center: $1k → 9%Violence Prevention Center: $800 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$154k · 16 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$154k
$14k

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BIRCH GROVE COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $17k · revenue +56%
  • VP
    Violence Prevention Center
    3× · 2021–2023 · $4k · revenue +50%
  • SM
    SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • ZL
    ZOAR LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • WF
    Wee Folk Child Care
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • NP
    Northwoods Playschool LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Empty Bowls Cook County
—
2
Cook County Chamber
Philanthropy
3
Chicago Hope Inc

Chicago Hope runs a food pantry twice a week that serves over 100 families. The organization is working toward the furtherance of wrap around services.

Human Services
4
Northern Il Helping Hands Food Pantry Nfp

To provide at least 2 days of food to needy families and people.

Food & Nutrition
5
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
6
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
7
Cook County Community Radio

Public service community radio station.

Arts & Culture
8
Washington County Senior Services Inc

To provide congregate meals, home delivered meals, transportation, and information and assistance to senior citizens of washington county, illinois.

—
9
Community Nutrition Network and Senior Services Association

The organization operates congregate and home delivered meal programs in suburban cook, grundy, will and kendall counties under contracts and grants with age option and ageguide (formerly northeastern illinois area agency on aging(neil)).…

Human Services
10
Grundy County Council On Aging Inc

Provide home delivered meals and congregated meals for area senior citizens

Human Services
11
Vote Yes for Clean Air Clean Water

The forest preserves of cook county are an integral part of our community and contribute to our quality of life. our forest preserves play an important role in helping to protect water and air quality, as well as habitat for wildlife. they…

—
12
North Scott Food Pantry

The North Scott Food Pantry provides food for people in need. Clients receive enough food for about one week and are allowed to get food every 28 days. There were 721 visits to our food pantry in 2025.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care Partners of Cook County; the most unlike its peers is Great Lunch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YMCA: $26,500 · OtherYMCACook County Food Shelf: $18,000 · OtherCook County Food ShelfCook County Schools: $9,273 · OtherCook County SchoolsOshki Ogimaag Community School: $9,000 · OtherOshki Ogimaag Community SchoolCook County Community Education: $9,000 · OtherCook County Community EducationStep-Up ChildCare: $8,000 · OtherStep-Up ChildCareCOOK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8,000 · OtherCOOK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGCooperation Station Day Care: $8,000 · OtherCooperation Station Day CareCook County Public Health & Human Services: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherGrand Portage Human Services: $5,000 · OtherZOAR LUTHERAN CHURCH: $5,000 · Other+12 more: $12,750 · Other+12 moreBIRCH GROVE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $17,000 · EducationBIRCH GROVE COMMUN…GREAT LUNCH: $14,000 · EducationGREAT LUNCHRuby's Heart: $5,000 · ReligionNORTH POINT INC: $5,000 · ReligionViolence Prevention Center: $4,250 · Human ServicesCare Partners of Cook County: $2,500 · Human ServicesEmpty Bowls CC-MN: $4,671 · Food & NutritionSAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC: $2,700 · Health
Other$131,523Education$31,000Religion$10,000Human Services$6,750Food & Nutrition$4,671Health$2,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBIRCH GROVE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $17,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGREAT LUNCH: $14,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetCOOK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetRuby's Heart: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH POINT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetViolence Prevention Center: $4,250 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC: $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCare Partners of Cook County: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIRCH GROVE COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LUNCH ↗
  • Who funds COOK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds Ruby's Heart ↗
  • Who funds NORTH POINT INC ↗
  • Who funds Empty Bowls CC-MN ↗
  • Who funds Violence Prevention Center ↗
  • Who funds SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Care Partners of Cook County ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lloyd K Johnson FoundationMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lloyd K Johnson Foundation · Northland Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Empty Bowls Cook County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Empty Bowls Cook County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Empty Bowls Cook County?

    Find your warmest path to Empty Bowls Cook County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Empty Bowls Cook County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph