Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Empty Bowls Cook County

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$84k
Granted FY2023
23
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212023.

Food & Nutrition$130kHuman Services$25kEducation$19kReligion$5kYouth Development$5kHealth$3k
02FY2023 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Great Lunch$6,000
Birch Grove Community School$5,000
Birch Grove Community School$5,000
Ruby's Pantry$5,000
North Point$5,000
Step-Up ChildCare$5,000
YMCA$5,000
YMCA$5,000
Oshki Ogimaag Community School$5,000
Empty Bowls CC-MN$4,671
YMCA$4,000
Cook County Community Education$4,000
Cook County Council on Aging$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Cooperation Station Day Care$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Care Partners of Cook County: $3k → 9%Violence Prevention Center: $2k → 9%Violence Prevention Center: $1k → 9%Violence Prevention Center: $800 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$154k · 16 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
11

Total granted

$154k
$14k

Still filing today

25%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EducationHuman ServicesReligionHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BIRCH GROVE COMMUNITY SCHOOL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $17k · revenue +56%
  • VP
    Violence Prevention Center
    3× · 2021–2023 · $4k · revenue +99%
  • SM
    SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $3k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • ZL
    ZOAR LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • WF
    Wee Folk Child Care
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • NP
    Northwoods Playschool LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Empty Bowls Cook County
2
Cook County Chamber
Philanthropy
3
Chicago Hope Inc

Chicago Hope runs a food pantry twice a week that serves over 100 families. The organization is working toward the furtherance of wrap around services.

Human Services
4
Northern Il Helping Hands Food Pantry Nfp

To provide at least 2 days of food to needy families and people.

Food & Nutrition
5
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
6
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
7
Cook County Community Radio

Public service community radio station.

Arts & Culture
8
Washington County Senior Services Inc

To provide congregate meals, home delivered meals, transportation, and information and assistance to senior citizens of washington county, illinois.

9
Community Nutrition Network and Senior Services Association

The organization operates congregate and home delivered meal programs in suburban cook, grundy, will and kendall counties under contracts and grants with age option and ageguide (formerly northeastern illinois area agency on aging(neil)).…

Human Services
10
Grundy County Council On Aging Inc

Provide home delivered meals and congregated meals for area senior citizens

Human Services
11
Vote Yes for Clean Air Clean Water

The forest preserves of cook county are an integral part of our community and contribute to our quality of life. our forest preserves play an important role in helping to protect water and air quality, as well as habitat for wildlife. they…

12
North Scott Food Pantry

The North Scott Food Pantry provides food for people in need. Clients receive enough food for about one week and are allowed to get food every 28 days. There were 721 visits to our food pantry in 2025.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care Partners of Cook County and the most unlike its peers is Great Lunch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YMCA — $26,500 · OtherYMCACook County Food Shelf — $18,000 · OtherCook County Food ShelfCook County Schools — $9,273 · OtherCook County SchoolsOshki Ogimaag Community School — $9,000 · OtherOshki Ogimaag Community SchoolCook County Community Education — $9,000 · OtherCook County Community EducationStep-Up ChildCare — $8,000 · OtherStep-Up ChildCareCOOK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $8,000 · OtherCOOK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGCooperation Station Day Care — $8,000 · OtherCooperation Station Day CareCook County Public Health & Human Services — $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $6,000 · OtherGrand Portage Human Services — $5,000 · OtherZOAR LUTHERAN CHURCH — $5,000 · Other+12 more — $12,750 · Other+12 moreBIRCH GROVE COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $17,000 · EducationBIRCH GROVE COMMUN…GREAT LUNCH — $14,000 · EducationGREAT LUNCHNORTH POINT INC — $5,000 · ReligionRuby's Heart — $5,000 · ReligionViolence Prevention Center — $4,250 · Human ServicesCare Partners of Cook County — $2,500 · Human ServicesEmpty Bowls CC-MN — $4,671 · Food & NutritionSAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC — $2,700 · Health
Other$131,523Education$31,000Religion$10,000Human Services$6,750Food & Nutrition$4,671Health$2,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBIRCH GROVE COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $17,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGREAT LUNCH — $14,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetCOOK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING — $8,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNORTH POINT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetRuby's Heart — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetViolence Prevention Center — $4,250 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetSAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC — $2,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCare Partners of Cook County — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BIRCH GROVE COMMUNITY SCHOOL
  • Who funds GREAT LUNCH
  • Who funds COOK COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
  • Who funds NORTH POINT INC
  • Who funds Ruby's Heart
  • Who funds Empty Bowls CC-MN
  • Who funds Violence Prevention Center
  • Who funds SAWTOOTH MOUNTAIN CLINIC INC
  • Who funds Care Partners of Cook County

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lloyd K Johnson FoundationMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lloyd K Johnson Foundation · Northland Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Empty Bowls Cook County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Empty Bowls Cook County?

    Find your warmest path to Empty Bowls Cook County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph