Skip to content

· Private foundation

Empowering Works Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$312kEducation$96kHuman Services$39kCrime & Legal$21kFood & Nutrition$7kInternational$1kHealth$412
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
$1,440
Median grant
5
States reached
$395k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVERBEND CHURCH$42,843
HIS CROSSROADS MINISTRIES$16,200
THE CHILDREN'S HOME$11,000
RESTAVEK FREEDOM FDN$1,440
CHRIST FOR THE CITY INTERNATIONAL$1,030
COME AND SEE FOUNDATION$1,030
FEEDING AMERICA$1,000
TO CURE A ROSE FDN$412
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 56% of grant dollars ($264k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 44% that went abroad ($212k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE CHILDREN'S HOME: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 44% of all-years giving ($212k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
El Salvador$212k · 6 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$461k · 7 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
5

Total granted

$461k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

14%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IB
    IGLESIA BAUTISTA INTERNACIONAL SILOE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $212k
  • NU
    NEHEMIAH UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2021 · $96k
  • RB
    RIVERBEND BAPTIST CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $78k

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME INC
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue +13%
  • RF
    RESTAVEK FREEDOM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • CA
    COME AND SEE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Invisible Girl Project

Invisible girl project's (igp) mission is to save girls' lives and end female gendercide in india. igp raises global awareness about this issue, partners with indian organizations that rescue and care for vulnerable girls, pursues justice,…

International
2
Save the Children Federation Inc

Save the children is an international nonprofit children's relief and development organization. our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.

International
3
Together Women Rise

Together women rise champions gender equality because womens rights are human rights. when women and girls are treated equally, the world is healthier, safer, more peaceful, inclusive, and economically just for everyone.

Philanthropy
4
International Centre for Research in Agroforestry

To generate science based knowledge about the diverse roles that trees play in agricultural landscapes and to use its research to advance policies and practices that benefit the poor and the environment.

Environment
5
Women Deliver Inc

Women deliver is a global feminist advocacy organization with a clear mission: to ensure that every self-identifying girl and woman has control over her body and life. see organization's full mission statement in schedule o.

Education
6
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
7
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
8
Refugepoint Inc

Refugepoint partners with refugees to access life-changing solutions and transforms how the world supports them. refugepoint seeks to expand access to lasting solutions for refugees, especially those facing vulnerabilities who are…

International
9
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
11
Beyond Borders Inc

Beyond borders helps people build movements to liberate themselves from oppression and isolation. in haiti and the united states, we are bringing people together for just and lasting change. the organization is currently commited to…

International
12
Women's Rights Without Frontiers International

Women's rights without frontiers, international ("wrwf- or "the organization") is a nonprofit entity supporting the rights of women and girls, first in china, then in other countries' communities. the organization was founded by regina…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restavek Freedom Foundation; the most unlike its peers is To Cure a Rose Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IGLESIA BAUTISTA INTERNACIONAL SILOE: $211,548 · OtherIGLESIA BAUTISTA INTERNACIONAL SILOENEHEMIAH UNIVERSITY: $95,600 · OtherNEHEMIAH UNIVERSITYRIVERBEND BAPTIST CHURCH: $77,866 · OtherRIVERBEND BAPTIST CHURCHWOMEN FOR WOMEN: $28,150 · OtherWOMEN FOR WOMENHIS CROSSROADS MINISTRIES: $20,800 · Other+3 more: $3,500 · OtherBELYDIA: $20,529 · Crime & LegalTHE CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesFeeding America: $6,500 · Food & NutritionTO CURE A ROSE FOUNDATION: $412 · Health
Other$437,464Crime & Legal$20,529Human Services$11,000Food & Nutrition$6,500Health$412

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBELYDIA: $20,529 over 5y, 10% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRESTAVEK FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $1,440 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTO CURE A ROSE FOUNDATION: $412 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BELYDIA ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds RESTAVEK FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TO CURE A ROSE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Empowering Works Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Empowering Works Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Empowering Works’ filings →

    More from the funding graph