Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elwood & Louise Hunt Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$104k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$441kReligion$382kInternational$101kPhilanthropy$70kHousing & Shelter$29kHealth$20kAnimals$11kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$124k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN DOOR HOME$50,000
Hands of Love for Bolivia$20,000
THE GENEROSITY TRUST$20,000
William Davies Homeless Shelter$3,000
Family Resource Center$2,500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$2,000
LIVING PROOF RECOVERY$1,500
DIGGS$1,500
Salvation Army$1,500
FLOYD FELINES AND FRIENDS$1,000
PAWS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $380k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%OPEN DOOR HOME: $100k → 15%OPEN DOOR HOME: $55k → 15%OPEN DOOR HOME: $50k → 15%OPEN DOOR HOME: $50k → 15%OPEN DOOR HOME: $50k → 15%OPEN DOOR HOME: $50k → 15%OPEN DOOR HOME: $15k → 15%OPEN DOOR HOME: $5k → 15%OPEN DOOR HOME: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$987k · 15 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
4

Total granted

$987k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
-3%

Still filing today

53%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OD
    OPEN DOOR HOME
    9× · 2017–2025 · $380k · revenue +75%
  • HO
    HANDS OF LOVE FOR BOLIVIA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $91k · revenue +47% · 37% of their budget
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • RC
    RED CROSS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • AV
    AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -3%
  • PE
    PEPPERELL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Their Lives Matter

Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home

Animals
2
Braveheart Bulliez Rescue Inc

Rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome homeless, abused, and neglected dogs in georgia.

Animals
3
Donna's Love Pet Rescue
Animals
4
The Davis Dog Farm
Health
5
Kingdom Dog Ministries

To share the Word of God of Obedience through Kingdom Dogs

Religion
6
Hearts of Hope Dog Rescue

Provide homes and vet care for homeless dogs.

Animals
7
Dalis to the Rescue

Aid in the process of pet adoption

Animals
8
Shepherds of Independence

To provide shelter, plus care, that meets physical, mental spiritual and social needs, while fostering dignity and independence in an affordable, warm, home-like atmosphere, to the mentally and physically challenged, to the displaced or…

Human Services
9
Adoptable Paws Rescue Inc

House unwanted abandoned domestic animal

—
10
The Adoptable Dog
Animals
11
Big Dog Haven Inc

To provide shelter, food,medical care, and rehabilitation to unwanted, abandoned, and stray dogs with the hope of finding a caring family that will adopt them into their loving homes

Animals
12
Last Chance Dog Ranch Inc

We are a dog sanctuary for unadoptable dogs.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Livingproof Recovery Inc; the most unlike its peers is Floyd Felines Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

First Presbyterian Church: $382,000 · OtherFirst Presbyterian ChurchTHE SALVATION ARMY: $38,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYFamily Resource Center: $22,500 · Other+10 more: $37,500 · Other+10 moreOPEN DOOR HOME: $380,000 · Human ServicesOPEN DOOR HOME+1 more: $4,500 · Human ServicesHANDS OF LOVE FOR BOLIVIA INC: $91,000 · InternationalHANDS OF …CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 · PhilanthropyWILLIAM S DAVIES HOMELESS SHELTER: $21,000 · Housing & ShelterSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionLIVINGPROOF RECOVERY INC: $7,500 · Health
Other$480,500Human Services$384,500International$91,000Philanthropy$70,000Housing & Shelter$21,000Religion$10,000Health$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN DOOR HOME: $380,000 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetHANDS OF LOVE FOR BOLIVIA INC: $91,000 over 9y, 37% of budgetCHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM S DAVIES HOMELESS SHELTER: $21,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLIVINGPROOF RECOVERY INC: $7,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFLOYD FELINES INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetDarlington School Inc: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIGS INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN DOOR HOME ↗
  • Who funds HANDS OF LOVE FOR BOLIVIA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM S DAVIES HOMELESS SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds LIVINGPROOF RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds FLOYD FELINES INC ↗
  • Who funds Darlington School Inc ↗
  • Who funds DIGS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S VETDOGS THE VETERANS K-9 CORPS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Rome IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Rome Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elwood & Louise Hunt Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elwood & Louise Hunt Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elwood & Louise Hunt’s filings →

    More from the funding graph