Skip to content
Eluna Formerly the Moyer Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Eluna Formerly the Moyer Foundation

Eluna's mission is to support children, teens and families impacted by grief or addiction.

$785k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$192k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$1.1MRecreation & Sports$779kYouth Development$287kHuman Services$221kArts & Culture$45k
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $705,522, the rows itemized in this filing. The $785,022 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $79,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $231k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $431k
$21,500
Median grant
18
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY LEARNING INSTITUTE$192,331
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$70,287
EAST END COMMUNITY SERVICES$58,502
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NASHUA$57,002
WESTCARE KENTUCKY$53,000
OAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER$34,500
LIFELINE CONNECTIONS$32,500
OVERDOSE LIFELINE$28,250
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF THE SUNCOAST$27,500
COMPASS HEALTH$26,000
WESTCARE GULFCOAST FLORIDA INC$21,750
COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC$21,500
NORTHWESTERN SETTLEMENT INC$18,500
THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE$10,500
PUNT PEDIATRIC CANCER COLLABORATIVE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $650k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BRIGHTER DAYS FAMILY GRIEF CENTER: $16k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $70k → 7%GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPICE: $5k → 10%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $33k → 11%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $21k → 14%FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF THE SUNCOAST: $28k → 9%THE COVE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN: $5k → 12%CORNERSTONE OF HOPE BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $5k → 17%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $47k → 21%CARING MATTERS: $6k → 8%ROBERTA'S HOUSE: $5k → 19%HOSPICE OF WESTERN KENTUCKY: $6k → 13%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $39k → 8%BRIGHTER DAYS FAMILY GRIEF CENTER: $5k → 11%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $66k → 7%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $12k → 11%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $20k → 14%FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF THE SUNCOAST: $28k → 9%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $22k → 21%CARING MATTERS: $5k → 8%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $13k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $42k → 7%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $9k → 11%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $11k → 14%FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF THE SUNCOAST: $28k → 9%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $20k → 21%CARING MATTERS: $5k → 8%GOOD SHEPHERD COMMUNITY CARE: $6k → 8%THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE: $5k → 14%CHRISTIAN WORKS FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $15k → 9%COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $20k → 21%NATHAN ADELSON HOSPICE: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
MD
TN
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 32 repeat orgs$103k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
17

Total granted

$2.3M
$93k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+45%

Still filing today

88%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $178k · revenue +37%
  • WO
    WESTCARE OHIO INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $174k · revenue +334%
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $166k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • PF
    PENN FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $12k · revenue +13%
  • HP
    HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +8%
  • BK
    BECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INCgraduated
    3× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas City Hospice Inc

To bring expert care, peace of mind, comfort, guidance and hope to people who are affected by serious illness or by grief.

Human Services
2
Serenity Hospice and Home

Patient care and counseling of the terminally ill and their families.

—
3
Hospice of Cincinnati Incorporated

Hospice of cincinnati creates the best possible and most meaningful end-of-life experience for all those who need care and support in our community by providing compassionate physical, emotional and spiritual care in an atmosphere of…

—
4
East End Hospice Inc

East end hospice is dedicated to improving lives across eastern long island through expert care, comfort and compassion for terminally ill patients and their families.

Human Services
5
Coastal Hospice

Coastal hospice promotes dignity and quality of life for patients and families who face life-limiting conditions.

Human Services
6
Hospice of Wake County Inc

To care for individuals and families with compassion, support, and expertise as they navigate the end of life or life-changing illness.

—
7
Our Hospice of South Central Indiana Inc

Our hospice of south central indiana, inc. (ohsci) is an independent, not-for-profit organization providing services to the terminally ill in a 22-county service area. since its inception 44 years ago, hospice has expanded to meet the…

Human Services
8
Cedar Valley Hospice Inc

Cedar valley hospice provides the leadership and sets the standard for excellence in delivering comprehensive palliative and end of life care to patients and services to those that grieve.

Human Services
9
Hospice of Reno County Inc

Enhancing the quality of life through integrated healthcare.to provide physical, emotional, and spiritual support and care for the terminally ill, families, and others through all phases of an illness so that they may live as fully and as…

Human Services
10
Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

—
11
Hospice of Spokane

Hospice of spokane provides a holistic approach to end-of-life care, addressing the medical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill person and their loved ones.

Human Services
12
Partners in Care

Partners in care is an integrated and comprehensive end of life services organization servicing the central oregon region with home health care; in-home hospice care; in-patient hospice care in partners in care hospice house; and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Santa Cruz County; the most unlike its peers is Fairview Health Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
23
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/62
Grantees still filing
51/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTCARE OHIO INC: $174,336 · HealthWESTCARE OHIO INCOAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC: $133,000 · HealthOAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INCWESTCARE KENTUCKY INC: $97,999 · HealthWESTCARE KENTUCKY INCOVERDOSE LIFELINE INC: $90,500 · HealthOVERDOSE LIFELINE INCWESTCARE GULFCOAST FLORIDA INC: $89,750 · HealthWESTCARE GULFCOAST FLORIDA INCLIFELINE CONNECTIONS: $83,000 · HealthLIFELINE CONNECTIONSWESTCARE TENNESSEE INC: $50,833 · HealthWESTCARE TENNESSEE INCKansas City Hospice Foundation: $45,800 · HealthCAMP MAGIK: $45,800 · Health+8 more: $94,750 · Health+8 moreJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $178,453 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SER…COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $108,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INCJewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc: $97,500 · Human ServicesJewish Family & Children's Ser…HOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC: $56,500 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD I…THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $56,300 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INCSAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $53,500 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICESFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $26,000 · Human Services+11 more: $82,925 · Human Services+11 moreCLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $330,560 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYNORTHWESTERN SETTLEMENT FOUNDATION: $77,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN SETTLEMENT FOU…COMPASS HEALTH: $74,000 · OtherCOMPASS HEALTHUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $25,725 · OtherFRIENDS OF HOSPICE OF THE LAKEWAY AREA INC: $25,000 · Other+6 more: $50,900 · Other+6 moreBoys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc: $166,003 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT: $67,500 · Crime & LegalMOURNING HOPE: $45,000 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $15,900 · Philanthropy
Health$905,768Human Services$659,678Other$583,185Youth Development$166,003Crime & Legal$67,500Arts & Culture$45,000Philanthropy$15,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $178,453 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWESTCARE OHIO INC: $174,336 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Greater Nashua Inc: $166,003 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetOAKLAWN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC: $133,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTIONS INC: $108,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetWESTCARE KENTUCKY INC: $97,999 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetJewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc: $97,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetOVERDOSE LIFELINE INC: $90,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetWESTCARE GULFCOAST FLORIDA INC: $89,750 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLIFELINE CONNECTIONS: $83,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWESTERN SETTLEMENT FOUNDATION: $77,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetCOMPASS HEALTH: $74,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT: $67,500 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC: $56,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $56,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $53,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCARE TENNESSEE INC: $50,833 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetKansas City Hospice Foundation: $45,800 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCAMP MAGIK: $45,800 over 5y, 21% of budgetMOURNING HOPE: $45,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $26,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOSPICE OF THE LAKEWAY AREA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetOUR HOUSE GRIEF SUPPORT CENTER: $21,225 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBRIGHTER DAYS FAMILY GRIEF CENTER: $21,200 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetTHE TRISTESSE GRIEF CENTER INC: $20,725 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetCARINGMATTERS INC: $16,125 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION: $15,900 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetWILLOW CENTER INC: $15,800 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetPENN FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPUNT PEDIATRIC CANCER COLLABORATIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE OF THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $5,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBECAUSE KIDS GRIEVE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetThe Cove Center for Grieving Children Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetTHE PARMENTER FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHOSPICE OF KONA INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNathan Adelson Hospice Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOME HEALTH SERVICES INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKARA: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetChristian Works For Children Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFairview Health Services: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HOSPICE OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROBERTA'S HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM WENDT CENTER FOR LOSS AND HEALING: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New York Life Foundat…Aetna Foundation IncFirst Interstate Banc…Greater Washington Co…The Blackbaud Giving …Seattle FoundationArthur J Gallagher Fo…The Bank of America C…Raymond James Charita…The Pfizer Foundation…Charities Aid Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…
New York Life FoundationNY32.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New York Life Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Seattle Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eluna Formerly the Moyer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eluna Formerly the Moyer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service of the Suncoast Inc: 67% of income from government
  • Roberta's House Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Hospice of the Good Shepherd Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eluna Formerly the Moyer’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home