Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elston Family Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2021
11
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Environment$6kCivil Rights$3kFood & Nutrition$2kHealth$2kInternational$2kPhilanthropy$2k
02FY2021 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$77k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Natural Resources Defense Council$2,000
World Aid$2,000
Center for Biological Diversity$2,000
Trident United Way$1,500
Simon Wiesenthal Center$1,500
The Nature Conservancy$1,500
Planned Parenthood$1,500
ADL$1,000
Southern Environmental Law Center$500
Backpack Buddies Seabrook Island$500
Barrier Islands Free Medical Clinic$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 58% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Simon Wiesenthal Center: $2k → 14%Natural Resources Defense Council: $2k → 17%Backpack Buddies Seabrook Island: $500 → 12%Planned Parenthood: $2k → 8%World Aid: $2k → 9%The Nature Conservancy: $2k → 7%Southern Environmental Law Center: $500 → 8%Barrier Islands Free Medical Clinic: $500 → 12%Trident United Way: $2k → 12%Low Country Food Bank: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Environmental Law Project Inc

We use our legal expertise to protect the land, water and communities across south carolina.

Environment
2
Earthjustice

Earthjustice is a premier nonprofit public interest environmental law organization. we wield the power of law and the strength of partnership to protect people's health, to preserve magnificent places and wildlife, to advance clean energy,…

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
5
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
6
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
7
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
8
Western Environmental Law Center

Public interest law firm - the western environmental law center uses the power of the law to foster thriving, resilient western u.s. lands, waters, wildlife, and communities in the face of a changing climate. we envision a thriving west,…

—
9
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
Environmental Defense Center

The organization protects and enhances the local environment through education, advocacy and legal action.

Crime & Legal
12
Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Inc

Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Environmental Law Center; the most unlike its peers is Backpack Buddies Seabrook Island. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD AID: $2,000 · OtherWORLD AIDLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $1,600 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INCPlanned Parenthood: $1,500 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYADL: $1,000 · OtherADLSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $500 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIO…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOUR…TRIDENT UNITED WAY: $1,500 · PhilanthropyTRIDENT UN…SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIES…BARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $500 · HealthBACKPACK BUDDIES SEABROOK ISLAND: $500 · Education
Other$8,100Animals$2,000Environment$2,000Philanthropy$1,500Arts & Culture$1,500Health$500Education$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIDENT UNITED WAY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBARRIER ISLANDS FREE MEDICAL CLINIC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACKPACK BUDDIES SEABROOK ISLAND: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elston Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elston Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Elston Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Elston Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elston Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph