· Private foundation
Ellenbecker Investment Group Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HAWS | $3,000 |
| Nativity Jesuit Academy | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,200 |
| Calvary Baptist School | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Underdog Pet Rescue WI | $1,000 |
| Fondy Food Center | $1,000 |
| Midwest Australian Shepherd Rescue | $1,000 |
| Blessings in a Backpack | $1,000 |
| Styles 4 Kidz | $1,000 |
| Loisaba Community Conservation Foun | $1,000 |
| Cystic Fibrosis Foundation | $1,000 |
| Compassion International | $1,000 |
| Peace Lutheran Church | $1,000 |
| Soles For Jesus | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.
86 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2023, 48 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
Center for Veterans Issues Inc4× · 2020–2023 · $6k · revenue +20%- NPNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION4× · 2019–2022 · $4k · revenue +145%
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +392%
Funded once
- I1Impact 100one grant, 2021 · $3k
- SFSecure Futuresone grant, 2022 · $3k
PEWAUKEE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +88%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…
We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.
We inspire people to experience life at its fullest by encouraging ownership of health, fostering independence, and serving the whole person; and do so with an unwavering commitment as stewards of medicaid funding.
Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.
To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.
To improve the health of the people of wisconsin by supporting and strengthening physicians' ability to practice high quality patient care in a changing environment.
Wisconsin family ties changes lives by improving children's mental health. it accomplishes this mission through a set of interrelated activities that support and educate parents, and inform practitioners, policy makers and the public about…
Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.
The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)
The purpose of the association shall be to restore and conserve wisconsin's waterfowl and wetland resources; to educate state waterfowlers during their progression from natural resource consumer to steward; and to promote governmental…
Defend the right to life of all citizens of our state, whether born or preborn, young, old, disabled, or terminally ill. we affirm that the right to life exists at the moment of fertilization and extends until natural death.
Our mission is to promote the quality of life of our communities by empowering others and working together to creatively solve unique health and long term care needs. to carry out this mission, we: 1. operate on a sustainable financial…
How this is measured
99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 214 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Center for Veterans Issues Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WAUKESHA COUNTY CHRISTMAS CLEARING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ROGERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds WEST AFRICAN MERCY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE'S CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FONDY FOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds SOLES FOR JESUS ↗
- Who funds PEWAUKEE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN HERO OUTDOORS INC ↗
- Who funds Hope Center Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Waukesha County Community Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Generac Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Emil Ewald Family Foundation Inc · Youth Foundation Inc · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ellenbecker Investment Group Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ellenbecker Investment Group Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ellenbecker Investment Group Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ellenbecker Investment Group Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Ellenbecker Investment Group’s filings →