Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ellen G and Edward G Wong Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of ELLEN G AND EDWARD G WONG FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$127k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SAN DIEGO MILITARY OUTREACH MIN$3,400
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$3,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOLUTION FOR CHANGE: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$278k · 19 repeat orgs$282k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
42

Total granted

$278k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+6%

Still filing today

68%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyReligionEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Miramar College Foundation Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $16k · revenue +213%
  • CR
    COASTAL ROOTS FARM
    2× · 2017–2022 · $15k · revenue +218%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF CHINA
    3× · 2017–2019 · $14k · revenue +262%

Funded once

  • FO
    FOUNDATION OF GRROSSMONT CUYAMACA C
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • BS
    BETHEL SEMINARY SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • NORTH COUNTY HEALTH PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $13k · revenue +65%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute of Contemporary Art San Diego

to advance regional contemporary art and artists while fostering cultural equity through access to meaningful art experiences

Arts & Culture
2
San Diegans for Health Care Coverage

Promote Access to Health Care for all San Diegans

Health
3
Arts Education Connection San Diego

Arts Education Connection San Diego engages professional teaching artists to provide high-quality arts education programs in all art forms for students, educators, families and communities, advocating for, leading and advancing education…

Arts & Culture
4
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

5
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

6
San Diego Christian College

San Diego Christian College exists to educate and inspire students through the truth of scripture and the development of competencies that prepare graduates whose purpose is to impact the world.

Education
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
San Diego Habitat Conservancy

Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.

Arts & Culture
9
San Diego Theatres Inc

San Diego Theatres, Inc. (SDTI) is a not-for-profit public benefit corporation established to manage and operate publicly owned performing arts theatres. SDTI was established in 2003 by the San Diego Convention Center Corporation (SDCCC),…

Arts & Culture
10
Santa Barbara Education Foundation

Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education
11
Curebound

The organization's mission is to provide funding for the best cancer research ideas in san diego. all proceeds from curebound stay in san diego to fund innovative and collaborative cancer research.

Health
12
Pasadena Bio Collaborative Incubator

Pasadena bio collaborative incubator is a nonprofit organization focused on economic development and job creation in southern california. we encourage the growth of an innovative biotechnology industry by providing educational/training…

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of San Diego County and the most unlike its peers is East West Christian Outreach Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Security & AgricultureFaith-Based Social ServicesSan Diego Education & Devel…Behavioral Health & Recover…Performing Arts Centers & E…San Diego Environmental Con…Law Enforcement AssociationsEthnic Cultural Heritage Or…Community Health CentersYouth Education and Opportu…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr21%16%10–20yr16%50%20–35yr10%19%35–55yr12%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr21%12%10–20yr16%60%20–35yr10%20%35–55yr12%8%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
14%
2,129/14,727

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WORKSHOP FOR WARRIER — $45,500 · OtherWORKSHOP FOR WARRIERFOUNDATION FOR GROSSMONT CUYAMACA C — $40,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR GROSSMONT CUYAMACA CFOUNDATION OF GRROSSMONT CUYAMACA C — $30,000 · OtherFOUNDATION OF GRROSSMONT CUYAMACA CBETHEL SEMINARY SAN DIEGO — $20,000 · OtherPROMIS2KIDS — $15,000 · OtherCOASTAL ROOTS FARM — $15,000 · Other+37 more — $220,181 · Other+37 moreTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION — $110,000 · EducationTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATI…Miramar College Foundation Inc — $15,500 · EducationMiramar College Founda…OCEAN DISCOVERY INSTITUTE — $5,000 · EducationHOUSE OF CHINA (HOC) — $14,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NEW CHILDRENS MUSEUM — $10,000 · Arts & CultureWords Alive — $8,500 · Arts & CultureEAST COUNTY YOUTH SYMPHONY — $6,000 · Arts & CultureASIAN STORY THEATER — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $3,000 · Arts & CultureEAST WEST CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC — $28,000 · ReligionFOREVER BALBOA PARK — $12,000 · ReligionResounding Joy Inc — $12,500 · HealthVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $11,850 · HealthSAN DIEGO EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 · HealthINTERACTIVE MEDIA INSTITUTE — $3,000 · HealthBurn Institute — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCatalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties — $5,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $5,000 · PhilanthropyGIRLS RISING — $8,000 · Human ServicesSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC — $2,500 · Human Services
Other$385,681Education$130,500Arts & Culture$46,500Religion$40,000Health$37,350Philanthropy$20,000Human Services$10,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CAMPANILE FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEAST WEST CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC — $28,000 over 4y, 23% of budgetMiramar College Foundation Inc — $15,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetCOASTAL ROOTS FARM — $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSE OF CHINA (HOC) — $14,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetNORTH COUNTY HEALTH PROJECT INC — $12,581 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetResounding Joy Inc — $12,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFOREVER BALBOA PARK — $12,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $11,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBurn Institute — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED THROUGH READING — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOUTDOOR OUTREACH — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAGUA HEDIONDA LAGOON FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSAN DIEGO EDUCATION FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSan Diego-Imperial Council Boy Scouts of America — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEW CHILDRENS MUSEUM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWords Alive — $8,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGIRLS RISING — $8,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetLIVING COAST DISCOVERY CENTER — $7,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $5,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN DISCOVERY INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERACTIVE MEDIA INSTITUTE — $3,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE SAN DIEGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOLUTIONS FOR CHANGE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA46× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Pratt Memorial Fund · French Fund Samuel Katherine Tua · Samuel I & John Henry Fox Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Parker Foundation · David C Copley Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ellen G and Edward G Wong Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ellen G and Edward G Wong Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ellen G and Edward G Wong Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph