Skip to content

· Private foundation

Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$353kRecreation & Sports$183kEducation$125kFood & Nutrition$84kHuman Services$67kPhilanthropy$53kReligion$52kHealth$34kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC$30,000
WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY$20,000
LINSLY SCHOOL$11,500
MERCERSBURG ACADEMY$9,000
FORT HENRY CHAPTER NSSAR$5,700
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY$5,000
DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION WHEELING CHAPTER$5,000
OGLEBAY INSTITUTE$5,000
YWCA$5,000
WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$3,000
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY$3,000
OGLEBAY INSTITUTE$3,000
ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP$3,000
WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$2,000
THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $9k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $8k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $8k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $5k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $5k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $5k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $5k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $5k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $4k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $4k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $4k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $4k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $3k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $3k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $3k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $3k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $3k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $3k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $3k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $3k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $2k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $2k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $1k → 15%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $1k → 15%APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $1k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $1k → 15%THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $1k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $1k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $1k → 15%ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 84%.

Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$895k · 23 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$895k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+16%

Still filing today

74%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OF
    OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $183k · revenue +284%
  • WS
    WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $147k · revenue +50%
  • OI
    OGLEBAY INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $90k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • WA
    WHEELING ARTS & CULTURAL COMM
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • FH
    FORT HENRY LIVING HISTORY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wheeling National Heritage Area Foundati

The exempt purpose is to support the quality of life and activity in the wheeling national heritage area through beautification projects as well as by acquiring and preserving historically significant structures.

Community Improvement
2
Wheeling Health Right Inc

To provide charitable, free medical care and pharmaceuticals to residents who fall below federal poverty guidelines and live in ohio, marshall, wetzel and southern brooke counties in west virginia and belmont county in ohio.

Health
3
Wheeling Mt Zion Cemetery Corporation

Administer and maintain mt zion cemetery as a place of internment or burial in ohio county, wv as well as to promote and protect its historic character and educational value.

—
4
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries

The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment

—
5
Wheeling Township Emergency Fund Inc

To provide family and individual charitable services.

Community Improvement
6
Ohio Hill Country Heritage Are

To engage the public in experiencing and learning about southeastern ohios history and culture by supporting programs, publications, and tours in the region.

Environment
7
Wheeling Forward Inc

The organization's mission is to provide guidance and resources to disabled individuals with a focus on educational attainment, employment procurement, health and wellness, community integration, recreation, housing acquisition, and…

Human Services
8
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
9
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
10
United Way of Wilkes County Inc

United way of wilkes county is dedicated to improving the lives of our citizens by underwriting identified programs that enhance their well-being through our 21 partner agencies. the united way of wilkes county annually impacts over 32,000…

Philanthropy
11
Winding Trails Inc

Winding trails, inc. is a non-profit organization serving people from farmington and surrounding communities, providing year round recreational and educational activities for the enjoyment and growth of families and individuals of all…

—
12
Fellowship of the Wheel

As a subordinate/chapter organization of the vermont mountain bike association (ein 03-0356194), the organization operates under the primary mission of its central organization, that being

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is Performance Edge Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MERCERSBURG ACADEMY: $50,000 · OtherMERCERSBURG ACADEMYLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $45,500 · OtherLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTERFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF WHEELING INCST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCHFORT HENRY CHAPTER NSSAR: $20,700 · OtherFORT HENRY CHAPTER NSSARIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $19,000 · OtherCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATIONSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · OtherSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INCWHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION: $11,500 · Other+12 more: $45,000 · Other+12 moreOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $183,000 · Recreation & SportsOGLEBAY FOUNDATION IN…WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $147,000 · Arts & CultureWHEELING SYMPHONY…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $65,000 · EducationWHEELING COUNT…THE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $56,400 · EducationTHE LINSLY SCH…THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $43,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE O…ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP INC: $32,869 · Human ServicesELMHURST HO…FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $24,500 · Human ServicesFAITH IN AC…+1 more: $2,100 · Human ServicesOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $89,500 · EnvironmentOGLEBAY IN…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $39,100 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $14,000 · Philanthropy
Other$270,700Recreation & Sports$183,000Arts & Culture$148,000Education$121,400Human Services$102,469Environment$89,500Philanthropy$53,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $183,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC: $147,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $89,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $65,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $56,400 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $45,500 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $43,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $39,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP INC: $32,869 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC: $25,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $24,500 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetWHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION: $11,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGROW OHIO VALLEY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAPPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC: $2,100 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPERFORMANCE EDGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE LINSLY SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds ELMHURST HOUSE OF FRIENDSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WHEELING INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
  • Who funds GROW OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMANCE EDGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hess Family FoundationWV32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hess Family Foundation · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · The Banford & Terri Exley Family Foundation Inc · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Eqt Foundation · W E Stone Foundation · James B Chambers Memorial · Chris Hess Foundation · The Driehorst Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elizabeth Stifel Kline’s filings →

More from the funding graph