Skip to content
Elizabeth & Kevin a Tattam Foundationinc at a glance

· Private foundation

Elizabeth & Kevin a Tattam Foundationinc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$602kHealth$133kHuman Services$31kEnvironment$20kAnimals$20kArts & Culture$10kReligion$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Xavier High School$50,000
Princeton Child Development$50,000
Wounded Warrior Project$20,000
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$20,000
St Ignatius School$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Greensboro Urban Ministry: $500 → 16%Wounded Warrior Project: $20k → 17%Wounded Warrior Project: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$707k · 11 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
12

Total granted

$707k
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+55%

Still filing today

36%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +112%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +7%
  • CF
    Center for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $20k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • PC
    Princeton Child Devel
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • PC
    PRINCETON CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +91%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Green Twp Vol Fire Dept Inc

To protect life and property from loss and damage caused by fire and other emergencies that threaten the residents of green township and surrounding municipalities.

Public Safety & Disaster
2
New Jersey Water Association Inc

Training & technical assistance

Education
3
United Methodist Homes of New Jersey

Compassionately serving in community so that all are free to choose abundant life.

Human Services
4
Pinelands Preservation Alliance

To preserve the pine barrens ecosystem, promote wide public engagement in their preservation, and advance acquisition of land and development rights by private and public conservation agencies.in addition to this work, the alliance has two…

Environment
5
Goodwill Industries of Greater New York & Northern New Jersey Inc

Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.

Employment
6
Glen Gardner Fire Company No 1 a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

The glen gardner fire company no. 1 is dedicated to protecting life and property. this is provided to the community with fire safety, safety education and fire prevention programs. the department provides professionally trained personnel…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Greenwood House Home for the Jewish Aged

The mission of greenwood house home for the jewish aged (greenwood house) is to provide the highest quality care for the elderly in order to meet their physical, emotional, social and spiritual needs in an atmosphere of compassion,…

Health
8
Nj State Firefighters Mutual Benevolent Assoc Inc

It is the mission of the new jersey firefighters mutual benevolent association to represent, protect, and educate the firefighters, emts, and dispatchers throughout the state of new jersey through representation at the local, state, and…

—
9
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
10
United Methodist Homes of New Jersey Foundation Inc

Fundraising in support of The United Methodist Homes of New Jersey.

Human Services
11
Greater Greenville Association of Realtors Inc

Providing standards, guidelines, and procedures to those members engaged in practice of the real estate profession

—
12
The Greenwich Land Trust Inc

Conserving the land. connecting the community. greenwich land trust conserves open space, connects our community with the natural world, and inspires the next generation of conservationists. the land trust permanently protects and cares…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Center for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Xavier High School: $221,750 · OtherXavier High SchoolPrinceton Child Development: $141,200 · OtherPrinceton Child DevelopmentJUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOL: $80,000 · OtherJUNIPERO SERRA HIGH SCHOOLST IGNATIUS SCHOOL: $65,000 · OtherST IGNATIUS SCHOOLMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN GREENSBORO DBA MENTAL HEALTH GREENSBORO: $60,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN GREENSBORO DBA MENTAL HEALTH GREENSBOROMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATIONPrinceton Child Devel: $25,000 · Other+10 more: $49,450 · Other+10 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesCenter for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc: $20,000 · AnimalsHARDING LAND TRUST: $15,000 · EnvironmentGreat Swamp Watershed Association: $5,000 · Environment
Other$692,400Education$60,000Human Services$30,500Animals$20,000Environment$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN GREENSBORO DBA MENTAL HEALTH GREENSBORO: $60,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCETON CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCenter for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHARDING LAND TRUST: $15,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetGreat Swamp Watershed Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW VERNON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION IN GREENSBORO DBA MENTAL HEALTH GREENSBORO ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRINCETON CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Center for Orangutan & Chimpanzee Conservation Inc ↗
  • Who funds HARDING LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Great Swamp Watershed Association ↗
  • Who funds NEW VERNON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds GREENSBORO URBAN MINISTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amg Charitable Gift F…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Amg Charitable Gift FoundationCO13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elizabeth & Kevin a Tattam Foundationinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elizabeth & Kevin a Tattam Foundationinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Elizabeth & Kevin a Tattam Foundationinc’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home