Skip to content
Elderbridge Agency on Aging at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Elderbridge Agency on Aging

Provides meals, services to maintain independent living, case management, transportation, advocacy, health screenings, assistance with chores and home repair, and

$2.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$15MHealth$4.1MHuman Services$1.6MCommunity Improvement$1.2MHousing & Shelter$709kCrime & Legal$318kRecreation & Sports$126kArts & Culture$22k
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 55 grants below total $2,010,556, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,354,679 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $344,123 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $791k
$29,444
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sixty Plus Nutrition Agency$119,795
Storm Lake Senior Center$108,453
Regional Transit Authority$80,717
Carroll Co Home Care Aide$67,841
Elderserve LTD$67,149
Midas Council of Governments$65,378
Worth Co Public Health$62,971
Guthrie County Public Health$60,633
Sisters Homestyle Entress$56,797
Downtown Grille$50,850
Carroll Recreation Center$50,697
Iowa Legal Aid$48,011
Kum Along Sr Citizens Club$47,488
Goldfield American Legion$46,693
Cerro Gordo Dept of Public Health$44,902
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $744k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Concerned Inc: $113k → 11%Concerned Inc: $111k → 11%Concerned Inc: $92k → 11%Concerned Inc: $90k → 11%Concerned Inc: $89k → 11%Concerned Inc: $87k → 11%Concerned Inc: $79k → 11%Concerned Inc: $39k → 11%Concerned Inc: $24k → 11%New Opportunities Inc: $19k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$23M · 84 repeat orgs$184k to everyone else

84 repeat relationships: 54 still active in FY2025, 30 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

84
8

Total granted

$23M
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+38%

Still filing today

21%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    Sixty Plus Nutrition Agency Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +10% · 67% of their budget
  • RX
    REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $649k · revenue +228%
  • SA
    St Anthony Regional Hospital and Nursing Home
    9× · 2017–2025 · $466k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • AW
    Athens Woods Estate
    one grant, 2024 · $43k
  • MP
    MERRILL PIONEER COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $38k · revenue +37%
  • UD
    UPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $29k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
2
Ozark Senior Center

Providing services to Seniors

—
3
Morton County Council On Aging Inc

Provide health and nutrition services to the citizens who are 60 years or older in morton and oliver counties of north dakota. services include congregate and home-delivered meals and health maintenance services.

Human Services
4
Davenport Senior Citizens

Meals for elderly

Human Services
5
Council On Aging & Human Services

Enhancing lives and building communities by providing transportation and nutrition services.

Human Services
6
Sherman County Senior Center Inc

To offer a nutrition program for older persons.

—
7
Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services
8
Senior Citizens Community Center Inc

Providing nutritional services through congregational and home delivered meals to the elderly and other special interest services.

Human Services
9
South Royalton Senior Center

Provides meals and services to senior citizens of the comunity and surrounding towns

—
10
Southside Senior Citizen Center

Adults day care

Human Services
11
Osage Beach Senior Center Inc

Provide affordable meals for senior citizens of our area.

Human Services
12
Jefferson County Area Agency on Aging

Provide services to meet the needs of senior citizens of Jefferson County, Pennsylvania

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Osceola Community Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Senior Citizens of Cc Area. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Sixty Plus Nutrition Agency Inc: $1,214,924 · OtherSixty Plus Nutrition Agency IncKim Buck's Cuisine: $915,016 · OtherKara Corporation: $840,415 · OtherElderserve LTD: $698,827 · Other+76 more: $15,715,451 · Other+76 moreEAGLE GROVE CONCERNED INC: $724,888 · Human Services+1 more: $18,750 · Human ServicesREGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INC: $649,323 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $18,925 · Housing & ShelterGOOD NEIGHBOR SERVICE COUNCIL: $419,968 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $224,331 · Food & NutritionSt Anthony Regional Hospital and Nursing Home: $465,930 · HealthNORTHWEST IOWA MENTAL HEALTH CENTER: $42,430 · HealthMERRILL PIONEER COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $38,257 · HealthAvera Holy Family: $18,886 · HealthHAMPTON SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $385,478 · Recreation & SportsIowa Legal Aid: $317,900 · Crime & Legal
Other$19,384,633Human Services$743,638Housing & Shelter$668,248Food & Nutrition$644,299Health$565,503Recreation & Sports$385,478Crime & Legal$317,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSixty Plus Nutrition Agency Inc: $1,214,924 over 9y, 67% of budgetEAGLE GROVE CONCERNED INC: $724,888 over 9y, 96% of budgetREGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INC: $649,323 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetSt Anthony Regional Hospital and Nursing Home: $465,930 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKUM ALONG CITIZENS CLUB INC: $459,869 over 9y, 84% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR SERVICE COUNCIL: $419,968 over 9y, 60% of budgetPOCAHONTAS CONGREGATE MEALS: $395,059 over 9y, 70% of budgetHAMPTON SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $385,478 over 9y, 78% of budgetLAURENS SENIOR PIONEERS INC: $343,259 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetMANNING COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $341,706 over 9y, 45% of budgetIowa Legal Aid: $317,900 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOSAGE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $250,303 over 8y, 62% of budgetCOMMUNITY KITCHEN OF NORTH IA INC: $224,331 over 9y, 11% of budgetESTHERVILLE HOUSING INC: $182,333 over 6y, 51% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF CC AREA: $177,439 over 9y, 77% of budgetClear Lake Senior Citizens Club: $126,883 over 5y, 57% of budgetMERRILL PIONEER COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $38,257 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUPPER DES MOINES OPPORTUNITY INC: $29,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOSCEOLA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $22,731 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF ROCK VALLEY: $22,003 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HAVEN INC: $18,925 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAvera Holy Family: $18,886 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY OPPORTUNITIES INC: $18,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sixty Plus Nutrition Agency Inc ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE GROVE CONCERNED INC ↗
  • Who funds REGION XII COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds St Anthony Regional Hospital and Nursing Home ↗
  • Who funds KUM ALONG CITIZENS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR SERVICE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds POCAHONTAS CONGREGATE MEALS ↗
  • Who funds HAMPTON SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds LAURENS SENIOR PIONEERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNING COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
  • Who funds OSAGE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Fdn of Grea…Center for Technology…Delta Dental of Iowa …United Way and Commun…United Way of North C…Grow Greene County Ga…Iowa Hospital Associa…First Citizens Bank C…Land O'Lakes Foundati…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community FdnIA25.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Delta Dental of Iowa Foundation · United Way and Community Foundation of Greater Fort Dodge · United Way of North Central Iowa · Grow Greene County Gaming Corporation · Iowa Hospital Association · First Citizens Bank Charitable Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Elderbridge Agency on Aging funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Elderbridge Agency on Aging. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 92 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elderbridge Agency on Aging’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home