· Private foundation
Eissa a Bateh & Brothers Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k45 grants · $62k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN RAMALLAH FEDERATION EDUCATION FUND | $11,000 |
| VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY | $7,500 |
| RAMALLAH CLUB OF NEW JERSEY | $5,000 |
| UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC | $5,000 |
| PALESTINE HOUSE OF FREEDOM | $5,000 |
| OUR LADY STAR BY THE SEA CHURCH | $3,000 |
| PUERTO RICO GOLF ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| BETHLEHEM UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| VIRGIN MARY ORTHODOX CHURCH | $2,400 |
| EMMAUS JOURNEY | $2,200 |
| FONTANA FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| CATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIATION | $2,000 |
| AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT | $1,500 |
| THE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND SOCIAL CHANGE INC | $1,000 |
| ST ANSELM'S ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UPUNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +400%
- VUVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +50%
- AFAMERICAN FEDERATION OF RAMALLAH EDUCATION CHARITABLE FUND8× · 2018–2025 · $49k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- CNCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOCIATone grant, 2018 · $3k
- LFLYRIC FOR LUCAS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $3k
- RCRAMALLAH CLUB OF NEW YORKone grant, 2022 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…
To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
Jerusalem University College creates opportunities for students to deepen their knowledge of God and His Word through immersive study of the ancient and modern contexts of Israel and the surrounding regions, equipping them for academia,…
Non-political humanitarian relief focused on healthcare for children in palestine.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Palestinian Appeal Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fontana Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED PALESTINIAN APPEAL INC ↗
- Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF RAMALLAH EDUCATION CHARITABLE FUND ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT ↗
- Who funds THE JERUSALEM FUND FOR EDUCATION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR MIDDLE EAST UNDERSTANDING ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Palestinian American Community Cent ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Education For Just Peace in Middle East ↗
- Who funds ARF HUMAN SERVICES NETWORK ↗
- Who funds UNITED HOLY LAND FUND ↗
- Who funds HEART OF MERCY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST COAST CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arab Community Center for Economic and S · The Salem Family Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Brothers Fund Inc · Kiblawi Foundation · The Andoni Family Foundation · Drs Subhi & Maysoon Ali Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Chubb Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Eissa a Bateh & Brothers Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Eissa a Bateh & Brothers Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Eissa a Bateh & Brothers Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.