Skip to content
Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 at a glance

· Private foundation

Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$558k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.1M
$195,409
Median grant
3
States reached
$48M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$558,311
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$334,987
WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY$251,240
PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE$209,367
FULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OPERATING$195,409
SEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY$195,409
PACIFIC LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY$195,409
THE KENNEY$195,409
FOSS HOME AND VILLAGE$139,578
BALLARD FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH$111,662
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH DEDICATED$111,662
BIOLA UNIVERSITY$83,747
CRISTA MINISTRIES$83,747
THE SALVATION ARMY$83,747
UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY$41,873
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $195k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE KENNEY: $195k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Seattle University

Seattle University is dedicated to educating the whole person, to professional formation, and to empowering leaders for a just and humane world.

—
2
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
3
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
4
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

—
7
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
8
Southwest Baptist University

Christ-centered, caring academic community preparing students to be servant leaders in a global society; a higher-education institution offering courses that lead to both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education
9
University of Northwestern - St Paul

See schedule o. founded in 1902, university of northwestern - st. paul is a nondenominational christian university that integrates the educational philosophy of "faith, learning and living" through two focuses: higher education and media.…

Education
10
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
11
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
12
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Pacific University; the most unlike its peers is The Kenney. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $558,311 · OtherSEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITALUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $334,987 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OPERATING: $195,409 · OtherFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OPERATINGIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH DEDICATED: $111,662 · OtherIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH DEDICATEDBALLARD FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $111,662 · OtherBALLARD FIRST LUTHERAN CHURCHTHE SALVATION ARMY: $83,747 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $251,240 · EducationWHITWORTH UNIVERSITYPacific Lutheran University: $195,409 · EducationPacific Lutheran UniversitySEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $195,409 · EducationSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITYBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $83,747 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERSITY INCPACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $209,367 · HealthTHE KENNEY: $195,409 · Human ServicesFOSS HOME & VILLAGE: $139,578 · Housing & ShelterCRISTA Ministries: $83,747 · ReligionUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $41,873 · Philanthropy
Other$1,395,778Education$725,805Health$209,367Human Services$195,409Housing & Shelter$139,578Religion$83,747Philanthropy$41,873

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY: $251,240 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $209,367 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetPacific Lutheran University: $195,409 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEATTLE PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $195,409 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOSS HOME & VILLAGE: $139,578 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $83,747 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY: $41,873 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Egtvedt Charitable Tr…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1NV15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Egtvedt Charitable Trust Special 1’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home