Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

EGL Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19M
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5.7M
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Philanthropy$25MHealth$25MEducation$12MInternational$10.0MReligion$8.4MScience & Tech$4.2MHuman Services$2.2MFood & Nutrition$874kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.0M
  • $250k+13 grants · $18M
$150,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$109M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY$5,660,000
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL$3,897,028
ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$2,185,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$1,389,519
WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE$1,100,000
Individual grant recipient$850,000
CHEVRA HATZALAH$500,000
B'NAI JESHURUN$468,200
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$450,000
JEWISH ORTHODOX WOMEN'S MEDICAL ASS$335,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$300,000
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTE$292,401
CITYMEALS ON WHEELS$250,000
Individual grant recipient$200,000
CENTER FOR INITIATIVES IN JEWISH ED$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%QUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC: $423k → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $150k → 6%QUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC: $417k → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $150k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $150k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $150k → 6%PEACE BY TOURISM: $25k → 17%DOROT INC: $150k → 17%DOROT INC: $150k → 17%DOROT INC: $125k → 17%DOROT: $111k → 17%DOROT: $100k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 25% of EGL Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

EGL Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$55M · 30 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
36

Total granted

$55M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+5%

Still filing today

40%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $402k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    3× · 2019–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +5%
  • C
    CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
    4× · 2019–2025 · $850k · revenue +42%
  • QA
    QUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $839k · revenue +105% · 32% of their budget

Funded once

  • WC
    WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $1.3M
  • HI
    HEBREW IMMIGRANT AID SOCIETY
    one grant, 2024 · $650k
  • CC
    CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABB
    one grant, 2019 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

7
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
10
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
11
Nyu Langone Hospitals

The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…

Health
12
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Communal Fund and the most unlike its peers is Peace By Tourism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr21%10%10–20yr20%25%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr13%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr21%8%10–20yr20%5%20–35yr13%55%35–55yr13%32%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/45
the rest of the field
11%
5,351/49,745

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/42
Grantees still filing
26/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE — $10,917,943 · OtherALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINEMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL — $6,364,329 · OtherMASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITALTECHNION RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT FOUND — $4,000,000 · OtherTECHNION RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDCONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN — $3,902,899 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUNIndividual grant recipient — $3,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL — $2,389,458 · OtherHARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOLWEILL CORNELL MEDICINE — $2,300,000 · OtherGOSHEN - THE HARUV INSTITUTE — $2,000,000 · Other+42 more — $8,639,836 · Other+42 moreJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $25,219,267 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUNDPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $3,260,988 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $7,298,875 · EducationTHE ROCKEFEL…The Trustees of Princeton University — $1,800,000 · EducationThe Trustees…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $804,150 · EducationTHE BOARD OF…+6 more — $521,622 · EducationJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $4,500,000 · InternationalHIAS INC — $1,604,620 · InternationalPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC — $515,000 · International+2 more — $1,767 · InternationalQUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC — $839,406 · Human ServicesDOROT INC — $636,490 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $600,000 · Human Services+2 more — $96,858 · Human ServicesBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $476,395 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $262,491 · HealthWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH — $233,589 · HealthHOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $200,000 · HealthTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Health+3 more — $12,750 · HealthCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $850,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $6,255 · Food & Nutrition
Other$43,514,465Philanthropy$28,485,255Education$10,424,647International$6,621,387Human Services$2,172,754Health$1,285,225Food & Nutrition$856,255

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND — $25,219,267 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY — $7,298,875 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $4,500,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $3,260,988 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $1,800,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC — $1,604,620 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $850,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetQUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC — $839,406 over 2y, 32% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $804,150 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC — $636,490 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $600,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC — $515,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $476,395 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $262,491 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $251,939 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH — $233,589 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $199,433 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE BY TOURISM INC — $25,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNefesh B'Nefesh Jewish Souls United Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetSESAME WORKSHOP — $23,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrevor Day School — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BERNARD'S SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXT FOR AUTISM INC — $5,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAG HARBOR COMM FOOD PANTRY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York Historical Society — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRETHINK FOOD NYC INC — $1,255 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSutton Place Parks Conservancy — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SECOND STAGE THEATRE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART'S CRY CHILDREN'S MINISTRY — $767 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEAST HAMPTON LIBRARY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University
  • Who funds HIAS INC
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
  • Who funds QUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DOROT INC
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds PARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC
  • Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
  • Who funds HOPE FOR DEPRESSION RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY24× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization EGL Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Hias Inc88% of income from government
  • Quincy Asian Resources Inc43% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research7% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to EGL Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to EGL Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph