Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Edwin and Patricia Gabrielse Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of EDWIN AND PATRICIA GABRIELSE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$515
Median grant
4
States reached
$293k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LUTHER MANOR FOUNDATION INC$15,600
OVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE$1,000
ALLIANCE BIBLE CHURCH INC$800
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$515
REHOBOTH CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS$500
OOSTBURG CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$400
SHEBOYGAN CO HISTORICAL RESEARCH$250
OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCTION CENTER INC: $500 → 6%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $500 → 6%CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC: $500 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$99k · 12 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
20

Total granted

$99k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-16%
+37%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPublic BenefitInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CORNERSTONE CHURCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $38k
  • LUTHERAN MANOR FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue -28%
  • TC
    TRINITY CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $17k · revenue -16%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • WR
    World Renewgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +26%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Globalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +82%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cornerstone Christian Schools

Cornerstone christian school educates children to become learners-equipped with godly character and biblical truth.

Education
2
Culpeper Christian School Inc

Culpeper christian school exists to please the lord jesus christ and to train students by working with the home to build academic excellence on the word of god. the school served approximately 150 students from k-3 preschool through 8th…

Education
3
Traverse City Christian School Asso

To glorify God and equip students to transform the world for Jesus Christ.

4
Cornerstone Christian School

The school provides a biblically sound education program of high academic standards in a loving environment that meets the need of the whole child: spiritually, academically, physically, and socially.

5
Tri-County Christian School

To promote and provide christian education.

6
The King's Christian School

The king's christian school is a k-12 prepatory school that equips and strengthens students through education and example, that they might stand firmly upon the word of god and to become effective servant-leaders who impact the world…

7
Sioux Falls Christian Schools Association

To establish and maintain a christ-centered program of pre-kindergarten, elementary, middle, and secondary education in which instruction shall be provided in accordance with the religious and other principles set forth in sioux falls…

Education
8
Southwest Christian High School Inc

Southwest christian high school exists to develop mature disciples of jesus christ who seek, know, live, and proclaim the truth and glorify god through academic, artistic and athletic excellence.

Education
9
Lansing Christian School

Recognizing god as the source of all truth, wisdom, and knowledge, lansing christian school partners with christian parents to educate children to the full extent of their god-given abilities. we engage students in an academically…

10
Carolina Christian Academy

Educational instruciton for students in prek-12th grades.

11
Southwest Minnesota Christian Schools

Rooted in christ, southwest minnesota christian schools cultivates the faith and knowledge of students, so they will grow in wisdom through the spirit and bear fruit in the world to the glory of god. (psalm 1:1-3)

12
Barclay College

The mission of barclay college is to prepare students in a bible-centered environment for effective christian life, service, and leadership.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oostburg Christian School Association and the most unlike its peers is Grafton Community Scholarship Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CORNERSTONE CHURCH — $37,550 · OtherCORNERSTONE CHURCHBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES OF WI — $7,000 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES OF WIRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $5,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEOVARIAN CANCER ALLIANCE — $3,000 · Other+20 more — $12,250 · Other+20 moreLUTHERAN MANOR FOUNDATION INC — $23,675 · HealthLUTHERAN MANOR FOUNDATIO…Ronald McDonald House Global — $1,000 · Health+2 more — $350 · HealthTRINITY CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ASSOCIATION — $17,000 · EducationTRINITY CHRISTIAN C…Rehoboth Christian School Assoc — $2,500 · EducationRehoboth Christian …+2 more — $250 · EducationCompassion International Incorporated — $2,415 · InternationalCASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S HAND INC — $100 · Public Benefit
Other$64,800Health$25,025Education$19,750International$2,415Human Services$1,500Public Benefit$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLUTHERAN MANOR FOUNDATION INC — $23,675 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ASSOCIATION — $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRehoboth Christian School Assoc — $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated — $2,415 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Renew — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAUTISM UNITED INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTeen Challenge of Wisconsin Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOOSTBURG CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S HAND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAFTON COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LUTHERAN MANOR FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN COLLEGE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Rehoboth Christian School Assoc
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds World Renew
  • Who funds CASA GUADALUPE EDUCATION CENTER INC
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global
  • Who funds AUTISM UNITED INC
  • Who funds Teen Challenge of Wisconsin Inc
  • Who funds BROOKFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OOSTBURG CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S HAND INC
  • Who funds GRAFTON COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC
  • Who funds SHEBOYGAN COUNTY HISTORICAL RESEARCH CENTERINC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baird Foundation IncWI16× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Barnabas Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edwin and Patricia Gabrielse Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph