Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edwards-Hobgood Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$30kHuman Services$20kPublic Benefit$8kHealth$7kPhilanthropy$6kRecreation & Sports$5kHousing & Shelter$4kYouth Development$3k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$202k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 100% of reported assets are held in Rbc.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROOF ABOVE$4,000
NWTF$2,500
INTERACT$1,000
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HARBOR INC: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$48k · 8 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$48k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+92%

Still filing today

25%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL
    2× · 2018–2019 · $13k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY ARCHITECT
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k
  • TF
    THE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • HI
    HARBOR INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +92%
  • CG
    CAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue -24%
  • AP
    ARENDELL PARROTT ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Suncoast Center Inc

For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…

Health
2
Thompson Child & Family Focus Inc

Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…

—
3
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
4
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
5
WakeMed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
6
Community Alternatives Inc

To provide responsive, person-centered services to improve the quality of life of individuals with disabilities.

Employment
7
Charleston Hope

Charleston hope is a nonprofit organization dedicated to increasing access to mental and behavioral health programs in title i schools to enhance student well-being. founded in 2011, charleston hope partners with school communities to…

Education
8
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
9
Carolinas Care Partnership

To seek justice through health and housing.

Health
10
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
11
Operation Par Inc

To strengthen our communities by caring for families and individuals impacted by substance abuse and to promote mental well-being. operation par, inc. offers a full continuum of services at locations in pinellas, pasco, lee, manatee,…

Health
12
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roof Above Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arendell Parrott Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $13,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY ARCHITECT: $10,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY ARCHITECTTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC: $8,000 · OtherTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INCNWTF: $6,200 · OtherNWTFKANSAS GOVERNOR'S ONE SHOT TURKEY S: $5,968 · OtherKANSAS GOVERNOR'S ONE SHOT TURKEY SCAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherCAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATIONPROJECT ALS TEAM CHRIS COMBS: $5,000 · OtherPROJECT ALS TEAM CHRIS COMBSCCA: $2,000 · OtherKANSAS GOV ONE-SHOT: $2,000 · Other+3 more: $2,350 · OtherHARBOR INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesHARBOR INCARENDELL PARROTT ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · EducationROOF ABOVE INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureTRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE: $2,250 · Recreation & SportsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,100 · HealthSOUTHLIGHT HEALTHCARE INC: $100 · HealthKimberlysTouch: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$59,518Human Services$10,000Education$5,000Arts & Culture$4,000Recreation & Sports$2,250Health$1,200Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARBOR INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetARENDELL PARROTT ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROOF ABOVE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE: $2,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHLIGHT HEALTHCARE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINAS GOLF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARENDELL PARROTT ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE GOLF FOUNDATION INC DBA THE FIRST TEE OF THE TRIANGLE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds KimberlysTouch ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHLIGHT HEALTHCARE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edwards-Hobgood Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edwards-Hobgood Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edwards-Hobgood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph