· Private foundation
Edward P Maronick Foundation First Premier Bank Trust Department
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k3 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GOD'S LOVE | $15,000 |
| HELENA FOOD SHARE | $15,000 |
| CARROLL COLLEGE | $15,000 |
| GOOD SAMARITAN MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| DIOCESE OF HELENA | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $9,600 |
| CHILD BRIDGE | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,400 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.
18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- CCCARROLL COLLEGE10× · 2017–2026 · $167k · revenue +3%
- HFHELENA FOOD SHARE INC10× · 2017–2026 · $141k · revenue +87%
- GLGODS LOVE INC9× · 2018–2026 · $136k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- TATHE ANGEL FUNDone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +8%
- LLLEGENDARY LODGE CO HELENA DIOCESEone grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide a Christian-based full curriculum to students in pre-K through 12th grade.
To provide non-denominational christian education opportunities in fort collins and the northern colorado region.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.
Valley christian school exists to partner with christian families who desire educational excellence, taught through a biblical worldview, so their children will be prepared for a lifetime of faithfulness and service to jesus christ.
The Intermountain Deaconess Home for Children is a non-profit organization which provides therapeutic education day treatment adoption shelter and outpatient mental health services to children families and adults.
Based on our commitment to catholic social teaching, catholic social services of montana provides for works of advocacy, compassion, pastoral outreach, education and social justice.
Saint louis christian college prepares biblical servant leaders for urban, suburban, rural, and global ministry.
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.
Holy spirit college is a roman catholic, coeducational college instituionally committed to providing an excellent education for all interested students. hsc seeks to educate and to fom students who, as leaders in professional and civic…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · United Way of the Lewis and Clark Area Inc · Treacy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Edward P Maronick Foundation First Premier Bank Trust Department funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward P Maronick Foundation First Premier Bank Trust Department. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Edward P Maronick Foundation First Premier Bank Trust Department?
Find your warmest path to Edward P Maronick Foundation First Premier Bank Trust Department through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Edward P Maronick Foundation First Premier Bank Trust Department’s filings →