Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward K Martin Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$216k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$1.3MEducation$72kRecreation & Sports$55kEnvironment$49kCrime & Legal$26kHealth$10kHuman Services$4kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $154k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$52,000
PROJECT SURVIVAL CAT HAVEN$51,780
PAWSQUAD559$50,500
SHINZEN FRIENDSHIP GARDEN$20,000
VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER$12,000
LABRADOR RETIEVER RESCUE OF FRESNO$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CCSPCA$2,000
CLOVERS HELPING HAND$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BREAK THE BARRIERS: $4k → 19%KIRKLAND FOUNDATION: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 14 repeat orgs$228k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
12

Total granted

$1.2M
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+51%

Still filing today

36%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $102k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PAW SQUAD 559 INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $211k · revenue +88% · 31% of their budget
  • BS
    BUY SELL RESCUE INC DBA MELLS MUTTS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $146k · revenue +35% · 36% of their budget
  • SC
    STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2019 · $65k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $54k
  • KR
    Kings River Conservancy
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue -29%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO CANYONLANDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +51%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Animal Rescue Inc

Rescue and place homeless animals

Animals
2
Spca of Stanislaus County

Protection and care of animals

Animals
3
California Animal Rescue and Education Sanctuary Inc

C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…

—
4
Sacramento Independent Animal Rescuers Inc

animal welfare

Animals
5
Solano County Friends of Animals

Animal rescue of abandoned cats and dogs

Animals
6
California Pit Bull Rescue

California Pit bull Rescue (CPR) is organized for the purpose of rescuing at risk "pit bull" type dogs and facilitatingsocial change to abolish the abuse,over breeding and mis-education surrounding the breed. CPR will achieve these goals…

Animals
7
East Contra Costa County Homeless Animals Lifeline Organization

To rescue homeless animals.

Animals
8
Valley of the Sun Dog Rescue

Rescue Dogs and place them in safe homes

Animals
9
Chico Cat Coalition

To rescue the feral and abandoned domestic cats and provide the rescued cats care until adoption

Animals
10
Arrf Animal Rescue

ARRF Animal Rescue is dedicated to the promotion of care and welfare of companion animals in Upper Kittitas County.

Animals
11
Northern California Border Collie Rescue &Adoption

Rescue and Adoption of Border Collies

Animals
12
California Animal Shelter Friends Inc

Providing medical and behavioral care (and animal shelter support) for animals at risk of euthanasia in animal shelters and veterinary clinics and then placing them into adoptive homes with a special focus on sick, injured and newborn dogs…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paw Squad 559 Inc; the most unlike its peers is Break the Barriers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT SURVIVAL CATHAVEN: $553,046 · OtherPROJECT SURVIVAL CATHAVENSTATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $65,000 · OtherSTATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $54,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $52,000 · OtherREEDLEY COLLEGE: $42,300 · OtherLAB RETRIEVER RESCUE OF FRESNO: $38,000 · Other+17 more: $208,225 · Other+17 morePAW SQUAD 559 INC: $211,287 · AnimalsPAW SQUAD 559 INCBUY SELL RESCUE INC DBA MELLS MUTTS: $146,050 · AnimalsBUY SELL RESCUE INC DBA MELLS …VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER: $32,000 · AnimalsVALLEY ANIMAL CENTER+2 more: $12,000 · AnimalsThe Clovis Police Foundation: $26,000 · Crime & LegalKings River Conservancy: $12,000 · EnvironmentSAN DIEGO CANYONLANDS INC: $10,000 · EnvironmentKIRKLAND FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesBreak the Barriers Inc: $4,000 · Human Services
Other$1,012,821Animals$401,337Crime & Legal$26,000Environment$22,000Human Services$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPAW SQUAD 559 INC: $211,287 over 5y, 31% of budgetBUY SELL RESCUE INC DBA MELLS MUTTS: $146,050 over 6y, 36% of budgetSTATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetVALLEY ANIMAL CENTER: $32,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetThe Clovis Police Foundation: $26,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetSHINZEN FRIENDSHIP GARDEN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetKings River Conservancy: $12,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO CANYONLANDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBOWE'S ANIMAL RESCUE: $10,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetKIRKLAND FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBreak the Barriers Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAW SQUAD 559 INC ↗
  • Who funds BUY SELL RESCUE INC DBA MELLS MUTTS ↗
  • Who funds STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY ANIMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Clovis Police Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHINZEN FRIENDSHIP GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Kings River Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO CANYONLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOWE'S ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds KIRKLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Break the Barriers Inc ↗
  • Who funds CC SPCA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC9.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward K Martin Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward K Martin Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward K Martin’s filings →

    More from the funding graph