Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward J Sackerson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$533k
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$292k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.7MHuman Services$333kHealth$169kYouth Development$168kRecreation & Sports$143kReligion$118kPhilanthropy$57kAnimals$47kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k44 grants · $168k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $72k
  • $250k+1 grant · $292k
$4,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY NAME CATHOLIC SCHOOL$292,356
ST JOSEPH & ST PATRICK CHURCH$21,262
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ESCANABA$15,500
SALVATION ARMY$15,500
COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$10,000
ESCANABA AREA FIGURE SKATING CLUB$10,000
PATHWAYS COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH$8,000
DELTA COUNTY CANCER ALLIANCE$8,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$7,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE UP$7,000
WILLIAM BONIFAS FINE ARTS CENTER$7,000
PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY$6,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF DELTA COUNTY$6,000
DELTA ANIMAL SHELTER$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $10k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $7k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $6k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $6k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $6k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $4k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $3k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $3k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $3k → 13%NORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA DELTA COUNTY: $2k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $2k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $2k → 13%NORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA DELTA COUNTY: $2k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $2k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $2k → 13%NORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA DELTA COUNTY: $2k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $2k → 13%NORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA DELTA COUNTY: $2k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $1k → 13%PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $1k → 13%TRI COUNTY SAFE HARBOR: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 80 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

80 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

80
37

Total granted

$2.8M
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+638%

Still filing today

24%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsAnimalsCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DELTA COUNTY CANCER ALLIANCE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $54k · revenue +11%
  • DA
    DELTA ANIMAL SHELTER
    7× · 2018–2024 · $31k · revenue +83%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $27k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • EB
    ESKY BAND BOOSTERS
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • KO
    KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS COUNCIL #640 ESCANABA
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Delta County Economic Development Alliance

Community development

Community Improvement
2
Grand Bay Athletic Association

Encourage outdoor activities, physical activities for children, community service, and overall health of community individuals.

Recreation & Sports
3
Superior Snowmobile Club

Maintains snowmobile trails in houghton and ontonagon counties in the upper peninsula of michigan.

—
4
Great Lakes Adaptive Sports Association

To promote and support the optimal development and well being of youth and adults who have a primary physical or visual impairment through the provision of inclusive recreational, fitness, and competitive sports activiites.

Health
5
The Detroit Skating Club Inc

It is the detroit skating club's mission to cultivate programs and provide facilities for the ice sports community that enable participants to achieve their goals in a safe environment.

—
6
Wolverine Nordic Ski Club Inc

To provide recreational ski trail to area residents and to visitors to gogebic county, michigan. to provide cross country ski lessons and to hold other fitness conscious events during the year.

Recreation & Sports
7
Girl Scouts Heart of Michigan

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place

Youth Development
8
Muskegon Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce

Member programs/services, economic development

—
9
Dark Sky Coast Association

The dark sky coast association is a non-profit organization supporting the development, protection and sustainability of michigans dark sky coast in northern emmet county.

—
10
Detroit Yacht Club

We are a historic, private yacht club dedicated to providing a variety of outstanding dining, social, recreational and boating programs for our members, families and guests.

—
11
Normenco Sportsmens Club Inc

State of michigan snonmobile trails and atv trails groomed and maintained. hunter safety courses conducted. fish plants made in public streams

Recreation & Sports
12
West Michigan Riptide Athletics Inc

Youth sports

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Menominee-Delta-Schoolcraft Community Action Agency Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eskymo Fan Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY NAME CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL A CHESTERTON ACADEMY: $1,079,244 · OtherHOLY NAME CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL A CHESTERTON ACADEMYHOLY NAME SCHOOL: $528,217 · OtherHOLY NAME SCHOOLSALVATION ARMY: $110,000 · Other+107 more: $909,193 · Other+107 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $27,000 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $20,000 · Human ServicesTRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE UPPER PENINSULA: $57,000 · PhilanthropyDELTA COUNTY CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $54,000 · HealthDELTA ANIMAL SHELTER: $31,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE UNLIMITED OF DELTA COUNTY: $9,000 · AnimalsMENOMINEE-DELTA-SCHOOLCRAFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $18,000 · EducationGLADSTONE HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL BOOSTERS INC: $6,000 · EducationGREAT LAKES SPORTS & REC CLUB: $5,500 · EducationESKYMO FAN CLUB: $4,000 · EducationLAKESTATE INDUSTRIES: $26,000 · Employment
Other$2,626,654Human Services$69,000Philanthropy$57,000Health$54,000Animals$40,000Education$33,500Employment$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE UPPER PENINSULA: $57,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDELTA COUNTY CANCER ALLIANCE INC: $54,000 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetDELTA ANIMAL SHELTER: $31,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $27,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAKESTATE INDUSTRIES: $26,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWILLIAM BONIFAS FINE ARTS CENTER: $22,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetPREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY: $20,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP: $19,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMENOMINEE-DELTA-SCHOOLCRAFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $18,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ESCANABA PUBLIC LIBR: $14,000 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetESCANABA AREA FIGURE SKATING CLUB: $10,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY: $9,500 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetWILDLIFE UNLIMITED OF DELTA COUNTY: $9,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetNORTHERN LIGHTS YMCA INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLADSTONE HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL BOOSTERS INC: $6,000 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetGREAT LAKES SPORTS & REC CLUB: $5,500 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetESKYMO FAN CLUB: $4,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF THE NORTHWESTERN GREAT LAKES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEscanaba Area Junior Hockey Association: $1,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE UPPER PENINSULA ↗
  • Who funds DELTA COUNTY CANCER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds DELTA ANIMAL SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds LAKESTATE INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM BONIFAS FINE ARTS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY SERVICES OF DELTA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BAY CLIFF HEALTH CAMP ↗
  • Who funds MENOMINEE-DELTA-SCHOOLCRAFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ASSISTANCE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ESCANABA PUBLIC LIBR ↗
  • Who funds TRI-COUNTY SAFE HARBOR INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Upper PeninsulaMI28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Upper Peninsula · The Donald and Audrey Anderson Foundation · Robert & Jeanine Dagenais Foundation · John and Melissa Besse Foundation · Daniel J Kobasic Foundation · United Way of Delta County · Superior Health Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward J Sackerson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward J Sackerson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edward J Sackerson Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Edward J Sackerson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward J Sackerson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph