Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward J & Myrna K Goodman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$259kPhilanthropy$190kReligion$148kHealth$51kHuman Services$38kArts & Culture$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $76k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$356k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA$20,000
ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL$19,750
CONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAEL$11,000
CONGREGATION RODEPH SHALOM$5,000
ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY$500
BREASTFEEDING RESOURCE CENTER$500
GRATZ COLLEGE$500
JENKINTOWN LIBRARY$250
FRIENDS OF THE ABINGTON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY$250
MCKINLEY FIRE COMPANY NO 1$250
DAUGHTERS OF 1853 NURSING SCHOLARSHIP FUND$250
WHYY$250
LEGACY YOUTH TENNIS AND EDUCATION$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $2k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $2k → 22%Jewish Relief Agency: $2k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $1k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $1k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $1k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $1k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of Edward J & Myrna K Goodman Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Edward J & Myrna K Goodman Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$518k · 33 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
7

Total granted

$518k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+18%

Still filing today

58%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +35%
  • AH
    ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +150%
  • JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • PH
    PHILADELPHIA HOLOCAUST FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • FH
    FEMALE HEBREW BENEVALENCE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
2
Philadelphia Jewish Film and Media

Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…

Human Services
3
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
4
Philadelphia Convention & Visitors Bureau

The philadelphia convention & visitors bureau (phlcvb) is the official tourism promotion agency for the city of philadelphia globally, and the sales and marketing agency for the pennsylvania convention center (pcc). phlcvb markets…

—
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
9
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
10
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
11
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
12
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Free Library of Philadelphia Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Mckinley Fire Co No 1. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $244,750 · EducationABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL+1 more: $6,500 · EducationRODEPH SHALOM CONGREGATION: $90,175 · OtherRODEPH SHALOM CONGREGATIONCONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAEL: $46,924 · OtherCONGREGATION KENESETH ISRAELJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $24,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVIC…HADASSAH OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $8,000 · Other+19 more: $29,075 · Other+19 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $190,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER P…+1 more: $300 · PhilanthropyABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $41,000 · HealthBREASTFEEDING RESOURCE CENTER: $3,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,600 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY: $4,360 · Arts & CultureTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Arts & CulturePhiladelphia Jewish Archives Center: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC: $2,250 · Arts & CultureAbington Art Center: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $400 · Arts & CultureJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $11,000 · Human ServicesMCKINLEY FIRE CO NO 1: $1,050 · Public Safety & DisasterPhilabundance: $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$251,250Other$198,174Philanthropy$190,300Health$50,100Arts & Culture$15,010Human Services$11,000Public Safety & Disaster$1,050Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL: $244,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $190,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGRATZ COLLEGE: $6,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY: $4,360 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBREASTFEEDING RESOURCE CENTER: $3,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPhiladelphia Jewish Archives Center: $3,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetJEVS HUMAN SERVICES: $2,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWHYY INC: $2,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAbington Art Center: $2,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ABINGTON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY: $2,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLegacy Youth Tennis And Education Inc: $1,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMCKINLEY FIRE CO NO 1: $1,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUNTINGDON VALLEY LIBRARY: $300 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABINGTON FRIENDS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds ABINGTON HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds GRATZ COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds BREASTFEEDING RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BARNES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Philadelphia Jewish Archives Center ↗
  • Who funds JEVS HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds WHYY INC ↗
  • Who funds Abington Art Center ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ABINGTON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Legacy Youth Tennis And Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCKINLEY FIRE CO NO 1 ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HUNTINGDON VALLEY LIBRARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Greater PhiladelphiaPA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia · The William Penn Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward J & Myrna K Goodman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward J & Myrna K Goodman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward J & Myrna K Goodman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph