Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward F Swinney Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$2.6MEducation$2.2MFood & Nutrition$1.0MHuman Services$875kHealth$523kPhilanthropy$300kAnimals$280kEmployment$230kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k12 grants · $275k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $765k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL WORLD WAR I MUSEUM & MEMORIAL$250,000
KANSAS CITY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC$150,000
HARVESTERS COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK$150,000
FRIENDS OF THE ZOO OF KANSAS CITY MO$125,000
FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER$65,000
CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$60,000
TRUST NEIGHBORHOODS$60,000
KANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE$55,000
KANSAS CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY$50,000
PAWSPERITY INC$50,000
COMMUNITY SERVICES LEAGUE OF JACKSON COUNTY$45,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES KC - ST JOSEPH INC$35,000
TRUE LIGHT FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$30,000
CITY YEAR KANSAS CITY$30,000
HOPE NETWORK OF RAYTOWN$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $580k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PLATTE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $15k → 8%PAWSPERITY INC: $50k → 15%PAWSPERITY INC: $45k → 15%PAWSPERITY INC: $40k → 15%START AT ZERO: $25k → 15%START AT ZERO: $20k → 15%CAMP ENCOURAGE: $10k → 15%CAMP ENCOURAGE: $8k → 15%START AT ZERO: $15k → 15%CAMP ENCOURAGE: $8k → 15%START AT ZERO: $15k → 15%CAMP ENCOURAGE: $8k → 15%START AT ZERO: $15k → 15%CAMP ENCOURAGE: $8k → 15%START AT ZERO: $5k → 15%COMMUNITY SERVICES LEAGUE OF JACKSON COUNTY: $50k → 15%COMMUNITY SERVICES LEAGUE OF JACKSON COUNTY: $45k → 15%COMMUNITY SERVICES LEAGUE OF JACKSON COUNTY: $45k → 15%COMMUNITY SERVICES LEAGUE OF JACKSON COUNTY: $40k → 15%COMMUNITY SERVICES LEAGUE OF JACKSON COUNTY: $35k → 15%COMMUNITY SERVICES LEAGUE: $25k → 15%TRUE LIGHT FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 15%TRUE LIGHT FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 30 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
13

Total granted

$6.9M
$945k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+49%

Still filing today

67%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $435k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $900k · revenue +10%
  • MC
    Metropolitan Community College Foundation
    3× · 2022–2024 · $800k · revenue +9%
  • US
    UNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $550k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $300k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CAPITAL FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +317%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
2
Kansas City Community Land Trust

Acquire and develop real estate to provide safe, decent, and affordable housing to low-income homeowners while working to ensure a culturally, ethnically, and economically diverse and stable community where generations can thrive in place.

Housing & Shelter
3
Nurture Kc

Nurture kc is a community collaboration dedicated to reducting infant mortality and improving family health. we work together to change policy for broad impact, transform systems to improve health outcomes at a local level, and provide…

Health
4
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

—
5
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
6
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
7
Kansas Children's Discovery Center Inc

The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.

Arts & Culture
8
Kansas Children's Service League Foundation

To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.

Philanthropy
9
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
10
Kansas City Artists Coalition Inc

The kansas city atrtists coalition is a nonprofit organization that promotes visual arts awareness

Arts & Culture
11
Urban Neighborhood Initiative Inc

Unis mission is to partner with kansas citys urban core neighborhoods to bring business, government, and community organizations together to improve prosperity, health, safety & education in the community.

Community Improvement
12
University of Kansas Memorial Corporation

The memorial unions function as a concessionaire to the university of kansas for the purpose of operating various enterprises within the kansas union building, the burge union, the debruce center, residential dining halls, and other…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metropolitan Community College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Northland Assistance Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
23/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $300,000 · OtherTHE METROPOLITAN COMMUNITY COLLEGEMISSOURI COLLEGE ADVISING CORPS: $300,000 · OtherMISSOURI COLLEGE ADVISING CORPSIndividual grant recipient: $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $220,000 · OtherCURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSO…CATHOLIC CHARITIES KC - ST JOSEPH INC: $190,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES KC - ST JOSEPH I…KANSAS CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $185,000 · OtherKANSAS CITY PUBLIC LIBRARYUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA: $160,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIACITY YEAR INC: $150,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INCABILITY KC: $120,000 · OtherJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE BUREAU: $100,000 · Other+15 more: $610,000 · Other+15 moreUNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC: $550,000 · Arts & CultureUNION STATION KANSAS CITY INCNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC: $500,000 · Arts & CultureNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM I…KANSAS CITY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 · Arts & CultureKANSAS CITY MUSEUM FOUNDATION I…THE RABBIT HOLE KC: $320,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RABBIT HOLE KCNATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL: $250,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIA…NATIONAL MUSEUM OF TOYS AND MINIATURES: $225,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL MUSEUM OF TOYS AND MIN…+1 more: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMetropolitan Community College Foundation: $800,000 · EducationMetropolitan Com…KANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE: $310,000 · EducationKANSAS CITY ART …MARIAN HOPE: $53,000 · Education+2 more: $45,000 · EducationHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $900,000 · Food & NutritionHARVESTERS - …HOPE NETWORK OF RAYTOWN: $90,000 · Food & NutritionHOPE NETWORK …+1 more: $20,000 · Food & NutritionCommunity Services League of Jackson County: $240,000 · Human ServicesPAWSPERITY INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesSTART AT ZERO INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesTrue Light Family Resource Center: $55,000 · Human ServicesCamp Encourage: $40,000 · Human Services+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesHeartland Foundation: $320,000 · HealthFAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE: $65,000 · HealthTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI C/O LINDA FALK: $225,000 · Animals
Other$2,585,000Arts & Culture$2,295,000Education$1,208,000Food & Nutrition$1,010,000Human Services$580,000Health$400,000Animals$225,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $900,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMetropolitan Community College Foundation: $800,000 over 3y, 8.8% of budgetUNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC: $550,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC: $500,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetKANSAS CITY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $400,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetTHE RABBIT HOLE KC: $320,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetHeartland Foundation: $320,000 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetKANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE: $310,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Services League of Jackson County: $240,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF TOYS AND MINIATURES: $225,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI C/O LINDA FALK: $225,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPAWSPERITY INC: $135,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetABILITY KC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSTART AT ZERO INC: $95,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetHOPE NETWORK OF RAYTOWN: $90,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE: $65,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTrue Light Family Resource Center: $55,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetMARIAN HOPE: $53,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCamp Encourage: $40,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetGREAT JOBS KC INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRAIN UP A CHILD INC: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE GIVING GROVE: $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTHE MIGHTY OAKES HEART FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetDE LA SALLE EDUCATION CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NORTHLAND ASSISTANCE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Community College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNION STATION KANSAS CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RABBIT HOLE KC ↗
  • Who funds Heartland Foundation ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WWI MUSEUM AND MEMORIAL ↗
  • Who funds Community Services League of Jackson County ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF TOYS AND MINIATURES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ZOO INC OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI C/O LINDA FALK ↗
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWSPERITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILITY KC ↗
  • Who funds START AT ZERO INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE NETWORK OF RAYTOWN ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE CENTER FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds TRUST NEIGHBORHOODS ↗
  • Who funds True Light Family Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN HOPE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LINC ↗
  • Who funds Camp Encourage ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO38.8× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · The Sosland Foundation · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · The Francis Family Foundation · The Sherman Family Foundation · Truman Heartland Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward F Swinney Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward F Swinney Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward F Swinney’s filings →

More from the funding graph