Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edward C V Mundin Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$142kYouth Development$88kHuman Services$23kHealth$20kPhilanthropy$9kHousing & Shelter$5kPublic Benefit$3k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$957k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOU FREY INST AT UCF$27,500
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENT FL$10,000
ELEVATE ORLANDO$5,000
KIDS BEATING CANCER$2,500
WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY$2,500
FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN$2,500
GIVE HOPE FOUNDATION ORLANDO$2,500
THE NATL CENTER FOR SIMULATION$1,500
ORANGE COUNTY EAST ROTARY FOUNDT'N$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $3k → 13%FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $3k → 13%FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $3k → 13%FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $3k → 13%FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN: $3k → 13%KIDS BEATING CANCER: $3k → 13%WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY: $3k → 13%WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY: $3k → 13%WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY: $3k → 13%KIDS BEATING CANCER: $3k → 13%WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY: $3k → 13%WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$339k · 14 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$339k
$6k

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FL
    FLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +48%
  • WP
    WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +47%
  • KB
    KIDS BUILDING CHARACTER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • FF
    FURYK FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FNDN - LAKE NONA
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Orlando Health Inc

Orlando health is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission as a community-owned organization is to improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health
2
Variety Children's Hospital

To inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child.

Health
3
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
4
Orlando Day Nursery Associationinc

To be the premier child development center in downtown orlando and have a lifelong impact on the lives of young learners and their families.

—
5
Florida's Children First Inc

Organization mission: florida's children first is a non-profit, nonpartisan, independent advocacy organization committed to protecting and advancing the rights of children and youth impacted by the child welfare, juvenile justice, and…

Human Services
6
Central Florida Kidney Centers Inc

Our mission is to provide exceptional dialysis care and services to individuals with end-stage kidney disease throughout central florida. we are dedicated to expanding access to treatment and ensuring all those in need receive quality…

Health
7
Orange County School Readiness Coalition Inc

The mission of the early learning coalition of orange county is to provide every child with equal access to high quality learning programs by supporting those who help children grow and develop.

Education
8
Florida Health Sciences Center Inc

As the region's leading safety net hospital, tampa general hospital is committed to providing area residents with excellent and compassionate health care ranging from the simplest to the most complex medical services. our shared purpose:…

Health
9
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Florida Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those from disadvantaged circumstances, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
10
Friends of the Children- Tampa Bay Inc

Friends of the children tampa bay has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…

Human Services
11
Orlando Health Central Inc

Orlando health central is a trusted leader inspiring hope through the advancement of health. our mission is to improve the health of our community by providing safe, quality healthcare services in an atmosphere of caring.

Health
12
The Florida Center for Early Childhood Inc

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids Building Character Inc; the most unlike its peers is Orange County East Rotary Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOU FREY INST AT UCF: $168,250 · OtherLOU FREY INST AT UCFBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENT FL: $60,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENT FLGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $23,750 · Other+6 moreFLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentFLORIDA L…FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesFOUNDATIO…WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesWINTER PA…KIDS BEATING CANCER INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesKIDS BEAT…KIDS BUILDING CHARACTER INC: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $7,500 · HealthOrange County East Rotary Foundation Inc: $2,500 · Education
Other$262,000Youth Development$30,000Human Services$30,000Recreation & Sports$12,500Health$7,500Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE: $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWINTER PARK DAY NURSERY INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS BUILDING CHARACTER INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS BEATING CANCER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRAINING AND SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY CONSORTIUM INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOrange County East Rotary Foundation Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORIDA LEADERSHIP VENTURE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR FOSTER CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS BUILDING CHARACTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVE KIDS THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds KIDS BEATING CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAINING AND SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY CONSORTIUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Orange County East Rotary Foundation Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dr P Phillips FoundationFL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dr P Phillips Foundation · Central Florida Foundation · The Lee Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edward C V Mundin Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edward C V Mundin Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Training and Simulation Technology Consortium Inc: 18% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward C V Mundin’s filings →

More from the funding graph