Skip to content

Ohio · Private foundation

Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
1
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2023
42%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$1,000
Organizations funded a year
7 to 16
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$79k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 42% of the organizations Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 78% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving1$1k0%
FY202312$12k42%
FY20227$7k29%
FY20219$8k22%
FY202014$7k7%
FY201916$11k38%
FY201810$7k10%
FY20179$5kn/a
90% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$12kYouth Development$11kEducation$8kRecreation & Sports$7kReligion$6kPhilanthropy$5kArts & Culture$2kInternational$2kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 19 grantees

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($9k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 17 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCincinnati Hills Christian Academy: $7,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSerenity Farm Equestrian Center: $6,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetLifewise Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Toledo and the Toledo Newsboys Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetReiter Family Foundation: $4,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetToledo Humane Society: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPilot Dogs Alloway: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetK-Love & Air1 Foundation: $1,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEvery Child Succeeds: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Toledo Zoological Society: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Nature Center: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNorthcoast Greyhound Connection Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCsn International Inc: $1,000 over 4y, 34% of budgetSky Dog Sanctuary Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Toledo Zoological Society Foundation: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZoological Society of Cincinnati: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDenison University: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Walter E Terhune Memorial FundOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Walter E Terhune Memorial Fund · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · The O-I Charities Foundation · Toledo Community Foundation Inc · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation with peer funders

About Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation

How much does Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation give?
Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $1,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 7 and 16 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Animals (20%), Youth Development (19%), Education (14%).
Who are Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Cincinnati Hills Christian Academy ($8k), Serenity Farm Equestrian Center ($7k), Lifewise Inc ($6k).
Does Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 42% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Walter E Terhune Memorial Fund, John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation, The O-I Charities Foundation.
Where is Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation based?
Edward and Linda Reiter Foundation is based in OH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edward and Linda Reiter’s filings →

More from the funding graph