Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Edson III and Tracy Bridges Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$188kEducation$124kAnimals$63kYouth Development$35kArts & Culture$24kHealth$8kCommunity Improvement$6kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$6,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$582k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE$8,000
NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY$6,500
COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$5,000
COMMUNITY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC$1,000
SHALOM PROJECT INC$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FUR THE LOVE OF PAWS: $4k → 12%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $15k → 12%MOUNTAIN HUMANE: $1k → 7%WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%FUR THE LOVE OF PAWS: $3k → 12%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $7k → 12%SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE: $8k → 7%WAKE FOREST ATHLETICS: $10k → 15%FUR THE LOVE OF PAWS: $2k → 12%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $6k → 12%SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE: $8k → 7%COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $1k → 12%FUR THE LOVE OF PAWS: $1k → 12%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 12%SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE: $8k → 7%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 12%COMMUNITY LIBRARY ASSOCIATION INC: $1k → 7%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 12%COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $5k → 12%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 12%COMMUNITY ALLIANCE: $3k → 12%NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 12%COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY: $3k → 12%CUES FUND: $10k → 12%CUES FUND: $10k → 12%CUES FUND: $10k → 12%CUES FUND: $10k → 12%CUES FUND: $10k → 12%CUES FUND: $5k → 12%ABIDE: $3k → 12%ABIDE: $2k → 12%MISSION CHURCH: $5k → 12%MISSION CHURCH: $3k → 12%DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $50k → 12%DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $50k → 12%DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $40k → 12%SAVING GRACE: $1k → 12%LAURITZEN GARDENS: $3k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE MIDLANDS: $30k → 12%DUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART: $25k → 12%DUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART: $20k → 12%DUCHESNE ACADMEY OF THE SACRED HEART: $15k → 12%DUCHESNE ACADMEY OF THE SACRED HEART: $10k → 12%DUCHESNE ACADMEY OF THE SACRED HEART: $9k → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE MIDLANDS: $5k → 12%DUCHESNE ACADMEY OF THE SACRED HEART: $5k → 12%DUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART: $5k → 12%BUSINESS ETHICS ALLIANCE: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$426k · 11 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$426k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+21%

Still filing today

55%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsReligionCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DP
    DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $140k
  • DA
    DUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART
    7× · 2018–2025 · $89k
  • CF
    CUES FUND
    6× · 2019–2024 · $55k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +18%
  • GO
    GREATER OMAHA ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS ETHICS
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -37%
  • LG
    LAURITZEN GARDENS
    one grant, 2024 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
2
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
3
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
4
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
5
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
6
Sound Credit Union

A member owned cooperative providing financial services, including loans and share deposits to its members.

7
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
8
Northwestern Health Sciences University

Northwestern health sciences university prepares and serves the next generation of professionals and leaders to become vital contributors to the delivery and advancement of health care. our mission is accomplished through educational…

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Midlands Humane Society

To protect and nurture companion animals and enrich the lives of people who love them.

Animals
11
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
12
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nebraska Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Fur Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $140,000 · OtherDUNDEE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHDUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEART — $89,000 · OtherDUCHESNE ACADEMY OF THE SACRED HEARTIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+8 more — $26,800 · Other+8 moreNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $51,500 · AnimalsNEBRASKA HUMANE…FUR ANIMAL RESCUE — $10,000 · AnimalsFUR ANIMAL RESC…+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsCUES FUND — $55,000 · ReligionCUES FUND+1 more — $500 · ReligionSUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC — $24,000 · EducationSUN VALLEY…WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationWAKE FORES…GREATER OMAHA ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS ETHICS — $5,000 · EducationGREATER OM…COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY — $2,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF…+1 more — $1,000 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$265,800Animals$62,500Religion$55,500Education$42,500Youth Development$35,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCUES FUND — $55,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY — $51,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS — $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC — $24,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER OMAHA ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS ETHICS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetABIDE NETWORK INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT MARY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Community Library Association Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHALOM PROJECT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CUES FUND
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE MIDLANDS
  • Who funds SUN VALLEY WRITERS' CONFERENCE INC
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds GREATER OMAHA ALLIANCE FOR BUSINESS ETHICS
  • Who funds ABIDE NETWORK INC
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SAINT MARY
  • Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER
  • Who funds The Community Library Association Inc
  • Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE
  • Who funds THE SHALOM PROJECT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Charles and Mary Heider Family FoundationNE17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Lozier Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edson III and Tracy Bridges Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edson III and Tracy Bridges Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Edson III and Tracy Bridges Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph