· Private foundation
Edris Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $2.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEIGHBORS LINK CORP | $180,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT | $170,000 |
| RIVERKEEPER INC | $170,000 |
| CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC | $150,000 |
| FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC | $135,000 |
| GREEN FORESTS WORK INC | $135,000 |
| TADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE INC | $130,000 |
| WE ACT ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE CENTER INC | $120,000 |
| NJ LEEP INC | $120,000 |
| ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER | $120,000 |
| LAND TO LEARN INC | $110,000 |
| WESTCHESTER LAND TRUST INC | $100,000 |
| MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC | $100,000 |
| ECOLOGICAL CITIZENS PROJECT INC | $90,000 |
| TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC | $90,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.
23 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- RIRIVERKEEPER INC8× · 2018–2025 · $872k · revenue +34%
- NLNEIGHBORS LINK CORP9× · 2017–2025 · $758k · revenue +297%
- EIENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT9× · 2017–2025 · $680k · revenue +120%
Funded once
- SASYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +45%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
See schedule onylcv is a non-partisan policy making and political action organization that works to make environmental protection a top priority with elected officials, decision-makers and the voters by evaluating incumbent performance and…
The central new york land trust seeks to preserve and protect natural areas in order to provide our communities clean water, clean air, wildlife habitat, and a chance to connect with the land.
The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…
Acquire land and easements to preserve and enhance the open lands, forests, water resources, scenic areas and historical sights of the Woodstock, NY area. Steward protected lands and offer educational programs and events regarding nature…
We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.
Environmental Law Foundation's (ELF) mission is to protect the environment, communities, and consumers against harmful toxics and other environmental harms. Our work consistently improves environmental quality for those most at risk by…
New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…
The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…
Legal assistance to nonprofit organizations working to solve environmental problems that threaten the people, natural resources and communities in the new jersey and tri-state region.
See schedule onylcvef's mission is to educate, engage and empower new yorkers to be effective advocates on behalf of the environment from clean energy and funding for parks, to solid waste and green buildings. first, we educate new yorkers…
Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.
How this is measured
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds TADA THEATRE AND DANCE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds GREEN FORESTS WORK INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COASTAL STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds NJ LEEP Inc ↗
- Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH SOCIAL SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds LAND TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds EL PRIMER PASO LTD ↗
- Who funds TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC ↗
- Who funds ECOLOGICAL CITIZEN'S PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Westchester Land Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds BRONX CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Life After Hate Inc ↗
- Who funds Climate Psychology Alliance North America Ltd ↗
- Who funds West Harlem Environmental Action Inc ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds SYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Field Library Inc ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Edris Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edris Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Center for Coastal Studies Inc: 26% of income from government
- El Primer Paso Ltd: 13% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Edris’ filings →