Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$425kHealth$175kHousing & Shelter$140kAnimals$122kHuman Services$109kEducation$102kFood & Nutrition$73kArts & Culture$69kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$418k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Morning Star Boys Ranch$55,000
Harrington Lions Club$6,000
Meals on Wheels Spokane$5,000
Lincoln Hospital Foundation$5,000
Odessa Hospital Foundation$5,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$3,000
Harrington School District$3,000
Union Gospel Mission$3,000
Salvation Army$3,000
Holy Family Catholic School$3,000
Vanessa Behan Crisis Nusery$3,000
Odessa School Distrct$3,000
Volunteers of America$3,000
Adams Country Pet Rescue$3,000
Special Olympics Washington$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Davenport Senior Center: $1k → 11%Davenport Senior Center: $1k → 11%Davenport Senior Center: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 45 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+57%

Still filing today

22%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +27%
  • SC
    SPOKANIMAL CARE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $30k · revenue +239%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON
    8× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • N
    NA
    one grant, 2017 · $164k
  • PC
    PTC COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • M
    MA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
2
East Bay Spca

The east bay spca founded in 1874, is proud to be one of the oldest shelters in the country and one of the most innovative in our region. our mission is to transform the lives of cats and dogs by enriching the human-animal bond through…

Animals
3
Vancouver Humane Society and Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To provide animal rescue, rehabilitation, veterinary care, rehoming and adoption services in southwest washington.

Animals
4
Mendocino Coast Humane Society

Caring for homeless animals, and finding homes for them through pet adoptions.

Animals
5
The Senior Dog Sanctuary

To provide a safe haven for senior dogs that are abandoned, abused, or face euthanasia who are unable to be cared for by their owners.

Animals
6
The Washington County Humane Society Inc

Rescue and care for stray or unwanted animals.

Animals
7
Dove Lewis Emergency Animal Hospital Inc

Founded in 1973, dove lewis emergency animal hospital, inc. (dovelewis) is one of the premier veterinary medical service organizations in the us and the only 24/7 not-for-profit animal emergency, critical care, and specialty hospital in…

Animals
8
Seattle Animal Shelter Foundation

Seattle animal foundation (saf) is on a mission to make sure every animal finds the love, care, and forever home they deserve. since 2010, we have been a not-for-profit organization raising critical funds to support life-saving programs,…

Animals
9
Sek Humane Society of Crawford County Kansas

Animal shelter providing care for unwanted and stray animals.

Animals
10
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
11
Dakin Pioneer Valley Humane Society Inc

Dakin humane society delivers effective, innovative services that improve the lives of animals in need and the people who care about them. as a trusted community resource center for pets and their people, we offer a variety of programs…

Animals
12
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spokanimal Care; the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NA: $164,100 · OtherNALINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $42,500 · OtherLINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONMeals on Wheels Spokane: $42,000 · OtherMeals on Wheels SpokaneOdessa Hospital Foundation: $40,000 · OtherUnion Gospel Mission: $35,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $26,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON: $26,000 · OtherLilac Foundation for the Blind: $26,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $26,000 · Other+35 more: $336,250 · Other+35 moreMorning Star Boys Ranch: $425,000 · Youth DevelopmentMorning Star Boys RanchSPOKANIMAL CARE: $29,500 · AnimalsSpokane Humane Society: $24,000 · AnimalsADAMS COUNTY PET RESCUE: $18,000 · AnimalsSCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION: $17,500 · Animals+1 more: $2,000 · AnimalsVANESSA BEHAN: $14,000 · Crime & LegalCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $8,500 · EducationDAVENPORT SENIOR CENTER: $3,000 · Human Services
Other$763,850Youth Development$425,000Animals$91,000Crime & Legal$14,000Education$8,500Human Services$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMorning Star Boys Ranch: $425,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetLINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetSPOKANIMAL CARE: $29,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON: $26,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSpokane Humane Society: $24,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetADAMS COUNTY PET RESCUE: $18,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetVANESSA BEHAN: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAVENPORT SENIOR CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetKOOTENAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Morning Star Boys Ranch ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPOKANIMAL CARE ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds Spokane Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds ADAMS COUNTY PET RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds SCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VANESSA BEHAN ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Roy and Leona Nelson Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph