Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$128k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Youth Development$425kHealth$175kHousing & Shelter$140kAnimals$122kHuman Services$109kEducation$102kFood & Nutrition$73kArts & Culture$69kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $73k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$418k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Morning Star Boys Ranch$55,000
Harrington Lions Club$6,000
Meals on Wheels Spokane$5,000
Odessa Hospital Foundation$5,000
Lincoln Hospital Foundation$5,000
Special Olympics Washington$3,000
Holy Family Catholic School$3,000
Second Harvest Food Bank$3,000
Vanessa Behan Crisis Nusery$3,000
Salvation Army$3,000
Union Gospel Mission$3,000
Harrington School District$3,000
Volunteers of America$3,000
Odessa School Distrct$3,000
Adams Country Pet Rescue$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Davenport Senior Center: $1k → 11%Davenport Senior Center: $1k → 11%Davenport Senior Center: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 45 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
8

Total granted

$1.1M
$187k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+57%

Still filing today

22%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $43k · revenue +27%
  • SC
    SPOKANIMAL CARE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $30k · revenue +239%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON
    8× · 2018–2025 · $26k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • N
    NA
    one grant, 2017 · $164k
  • PC
    PTC COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • M
    MA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws of Grays Harbor

PAWS cares for lost, abandoned and abused animals and finds them new homes with responsible owners. PAWS also provides low cost spay and neuter services, a pet food pantry, and community education. During 2024 PAWS adopted out 577 pets.…

Animals
2
East Bay Spca

The east bay spca founded in 1874, is proud to be one of the oldest shelters in the country and one of the most innovative in our region. our mission is to transform the lives of cats and dogs by enriching the human-animal bond through…

Animals
3
Vancouver Humane Society and Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To provide animal rescue, rehabilitation, veterinary care, rehoming and adoption services in southwest washington.

Animals
4
Mendocino Coast Humane Society

Caring for homeless animals, and finding homes for them through pet adoptions.

Animals
5
The Senior Dog Sanctuary

To provide a safe haven for senior dogs that are abandoned, abused, or face euthanasia who are unable to be cared for by their owners.

Animals
6
The Washington County Humane Society Inc

Rescue and care for stray or unwanted animals.

Animals
7
Dove Lewis Emergency Animal Hospital Inc

Founded in 1973, dove lewis emergency animal hospital, inc. (dovelewis) is one of the premier veterinary medical service organizations in the us and the only 24/7 not-for-profit animal emergency, critical care, and specialty hospital in…

Animals
8
Seattle Animal Shelter Foundation

Seattle animal foundation (saf) is on a mission to make sure every animal finds the love, care, and forever home they deserve. since 2010, we have been a not-for-profit organization raising critical funds to support life-saving programs,…

Animals
9
Sek Humane Society of Crawford County Kansas

Animal shelter providing care for unwanted and stray animals.

Animals
10
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
11
Dakin Pioneer Valley Humane Society Inc

Dakin humane society delivers effective, innovative services that improve the lives of animals in need and the people who care about them. as a trusted community resource center for pets and their people, we offer a variety of programs…

Animals
12
Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland

The Animal Refuge League of Greater Portland nurtures the connection between people and pets to advance animal welfare and improve the quality of life in our community.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spokanimal Care and the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NA — $164,100 · OtherNALINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $42,500 · OtherLINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONMeals on Wheels Spokane — $42,000 · OtherMeals on Wheels SpokaneOdessa Hospital Foundation — $40,000 · OtherUnion Gospel Mission — $35,000 · OtherLilac Foundation for the Blind — $26,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON — $26,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY — $26,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK — $26,000 · Other+35 more — $336,250 · Other+35 moreMorning Star Boys Ranch — $425,000 · Youth DevelopmentMorning Star Boys RanchSPOKANIMAL CARE — $29,500 · AnimalsSpokane Humane Society — $24,000 · AnimalsADAMS COUNTY PET RESCUE — $18,000 · AnimalsSCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION — $17,500 · Animals+1 more — $2,000 · AnimalsVANESSA BEHAN — $14,000 · Crime & LegalCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $8,500 · EducationDAVENPORT SENIOR CENTER — $3,000 · Human Services
Other$763,850Youth Development$425,000Animals$91,000Crime & Legal$14,000Education$8,500Human Services$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMorning Star Boys Ranch — $425,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetLINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $42,500 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetSPOKANIMAL CARE — $29,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON — $26,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSpokane Humane Society — $24,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetADAMS COUNTY PET RESCUE — $18,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION — $17,500 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetVANESSA BEHAN — $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDAVENPORT SENIOR CENTER — $3,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetKOOTENAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Morning Star Boys Ranch
  • Who funds LINCOLN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SPOKANIMAL CARE
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WASHINGTON
  • Who funds Spokane Humane Society
  • Who funds ADAMS COUNTY PET RESCUE
  • Who funds SCRAPS HOPE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VANESSA BEHAN
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationWA22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · Roy and Leona Nelson Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Edmund W and Darlene L Braune Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph