· Private foundation
Edith Crocker Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MANCHESTER FBO NORTH COUNTRY UNIT | $6,000 |
| COPPER CANNON CAMP | $2,879 |
| TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $2,500 |
| A PLACE TO TURN | $2,076 |
| NASHOBA LEARNING GROUP | $1,880 |
| WELLSPRING HOUSE INC | $1,880 |
| WORLD OCEAN SCHOOL | $1,879 |
| TECH GOES HOME | $1,879 |
| THE OPEN DOOR - CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY | $1,879 |
| GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES | $1,500 |
| BETHANY HILL PLACE | $1,300 |
| SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF NH FORESTS | $1,200 |
| CAMP SUNSHINE | $1,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| AMMONOOSUC CONSERVATION TRUST | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCOPPER CANNON CORPORATION5× · 2021–2025 · $14k · revenue +41%
- TCTexas Children's Hospital5× · 2021–2025 · $13k · revenue +40%
WELLSPRING HOUSE INC5× · 2021–2025 · $10k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- TOTHE OPEN DOOR - CAPE COD FOOD PANTRYone grant, 2022 · $2k
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT HEALTH NETWORK HOME HEALTH & HOSPICEone grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue -3%
- HRHALE RESERVATION AKA HALE EDUCATION INCone grant, 2022 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…
To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.
Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
To preserve and protect land surrounding the appalachian trail in maine for public benefit.
CH-Laconia is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.
Northeast wilderness trust is a regional land trust working to preserve and restore forever-wild landscapes for nature and people in new york, vermont, new hampshire, maine, massachusetts and connecticut.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
The mission of the lake champlain land trust is to save the scenic beauty, natural communities, and recreational amenities of lake champlain by permanently preserving significant islands, shoreline areas, and natural communities in the…
Mt. ascutney hospital and health center's mission is to improve the lives of those we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Country Home Health & Hospice Agency Inc and the most unlike its peers is Second Chance Animal Rescue Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COPPER CANNON CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NASHOBA LEARNING GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds TECH GOES HOME INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds World Ocean School Inc ↗
- Who funds GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds A Place To Turn Inc ↗
- Who funds AMMONOOSUC CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds BETHANY HILL PLACE ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTRY HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLONIAL THEATRE ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLETON STUDIO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Lisbon Regional School Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTRY CHAMBER PLAYERSINC ↗
- Who funds Ammonoosuc Community Health Services Inc ↗
- Who funds DOVER LAND CONSERVATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds MOUNT WASHINGTON OBSERVATORY ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT HEALTH NETWORK HOME HEALTH & HOSPICE ↗
- Who funds Lisbon Area Historical Society ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Massachusetts Charitable Society · Ibm International Foundation · Lucy E Holcombe Charitable Foundation · The Wolfe Family Charitable Foundation · Fiduciary Charitable Foundation Dba Fiduciary Trust Charitable · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Fidelity Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Edith Crocker Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New England Forestry Foundation Inc — 88% of income from government
- Nashoba Learning Group Inc — 14% of income from government
- Tech Goes Home Incorporated — 10% of income from government
- Wellspring House Inc — 9% of income from government
- World Ocean School Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Edith Crocker Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to Edith Crocker Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.