Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

Edith C Justus Tuw

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$301k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2025
7
Organizations funded FY2024
0%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$13,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$85,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 9
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
5
Total assets, FY2025
$6.7M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 0% of the organizations Edith C Justus Tuw funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$250k50%
FY20247$261k0%
FY20239$216k44%
FY20228$237k25%
FY20216$64k17%
FY20207$223k29%
FY20197$188k43%
FY20186$116k33%
99% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$728kYouth Development$612kHuman Services$541kCommunity Improvement$237kArts & Culture$82kReligion$71kInternational$45kHealth$43kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees
All grantees of Edith C Justus Tuw by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Youth Alternatives INC$450,000435%
Community Services of Venango County Inc$155,12932%
St Elizabeth Center$97,860220%
Bridge Builders Foundation$86,8931n/a
Venango Chamber Foundation$56,518134%
United Way of Venango County and Titusville Region$55,00092%
The Pointe$33,1471n/a
Oil Region Library Association$31,80013%
Young Womens Christian Association of Oil City$29,200112%
Young Womens Christian Association of San Antonio$25,00010%
Belles Lettres Club$23,90028%
Oil City Area Meals-On-Wheels Inc$13,0001n/a

Plus 18 recipients with no EIN on record ($753k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Edith C Justus Tuw supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 2 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 9 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYouth Alternatives INC: $450,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetCommunity Services of Venango County Inc: $155,129 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSt Elizabeth Center: $97,860 over 2y, 20% of budgetVenango Chamber Foundation: $56,518 over 1y, 34% of budgetUnited Way of Venango County and Titusville Region: $55,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetOil Region Library Association: $31,800 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetYoung Womens Christian Association of Oil City: $29,200 over 1y, 12% of budgetYoung Womens Christian Association of San Antonio: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBelles Lettres Club: $23,900 over 2y, 8.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Samuel-Edith Justus Char TrustPA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Samuel-Edith Justus Char Trust · Arthur W Phillips Trust Uw · Elizabeth S Black Charitable Trust · Bridge Builders Community Foundations Fka Venango Area Comm Foundation · McElhattan Foundation · Fair Frederick&Ellen Memorial · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Edith C Justus Tuw with peer funders

About Edith C Justus Tuw

How much does Edith C Justus Tuw give?
Edith C Justus Tuw reported 11 grants totaling $300,865 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Edith C Justus Tuw fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (29%), Youth Development (25%), Human Services (22%).
Who are Edith C Justus Tuw's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Youth Alternatives INC ($450k), Community Services of Venango County Inc ($155k), St Elizabeth Center ($98k).
Does Edith C Justus Tuw fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Edith C Justus Tuw accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Edith C Justus Tuw?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Samuel-Edith Justus Char Trust, Arthur W Phillips Trust Uw, Elizabeth S Black Charitable Trust.
Where is Edith C Justus Tuw based?
Edith C Justus Tuw is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edith C Justus Tuw’s filings →

More from the funding graph