Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Edidin Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2018
23
Grants FY2018
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172018.

Philanthropy$20kHealth$16kHuman Services$5kArts & Culture$3kCivil Rights$3kEducation$2kCrime & Legal$2kInternational$2kOther$0
02FY2018 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k22 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$360
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH UNITED FUND$10,000
LIFE FOR A CHILD USA$5,000
NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$2,000
CHICAGO SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,500
THE PENN FUND$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL$1,000
MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE$1,000
BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST$1,000
FRIENDS OF THE GREEN BAY TRAIL$1,000
KESHET$500
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION$360
WRITERS THEATER$250
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$180
FAMILY SERVICES OF GLENCOE$150
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY SERVICES OF GLENCOE: $150 → 14%FAMILY SERVICES OF GLENCOE: $150 → 14%GLENCOE YOUTH SERVICES: $100 → 14%GLENCOE YOUTH SERVICES: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$49k · 18 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
11

Total granted

$49k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+116%

Still filing today

61%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $20k · revenue +13%
  • LF
    LIFE FOR A CHILD USA INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +252%
  • IF
    IMPACT FOR EQUITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +116%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAG LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • AA
    ALEPPO ASSISTANCE FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
2
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
3
Jewish Child and Family Services

JCFS Chicago services and programs support wellbeing for children, teens, adults and families regardless of race, culture, religion, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, or…

Human Services
4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
6
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

7
Junior Achievement of Chicago

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy

International
8
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Jewish Graduate Student Initiative

To support jewish life on graduate school campuses and to connect jewish graduate students, alumni, and executives to their heritage and the greater jewish community.

Education
11
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing History & Ourselves Inc and the most unlike its peers is Multiple Sclerosis Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%10%10–20yr15%20%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr22%45%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%25%10–20yr15%4%20–35yr14%5%35–55yr22%66%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,339

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $20,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CH…NORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAY — $5,000 · OtherNORTH SHORE COUNTRY DAYPLANNED PARENTHOOD — $4,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODTHE PENN FUND — $2,000 · OtherTHE PENN FUNDUNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL — $1,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CHICAG LAW SCHOOL — $1,000 · OtherKESHET — $1,000 · OtherALEPPO ASSISTANCE FUND — $1,000 · OtherMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC — $720 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE GREEN BAY TRAIL — $1,000 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $1,000 · Other+17 more — $3,785 · Other+17 moreLIFE FOR A CHILD USA INC — $10,000 · HealthLIFE FOR A CHILD U…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $3,000 · Civil RightsChicago Symphony Orchestra — $1,500 · Arts & CultureWriters Theatre Inc — $400 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $360 · Arts & CultureIMPACT FOR EQUITY — $2,000 · Crime & LegalPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $2,000 · Education
Philanthropy$20,000Other$21,505Health$10,000Civil Rights$3,000Arts & Culture$2,260Crime & Legal$2,000Education$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE FOR A CHILD USA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACT FOR EQUITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Symphony Orchestra — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION INC — $720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWriters Theatre Inc — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC — $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF GLENCOE — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTAOS LAND TRUST — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLENCOE YOUTH SERVICES A CORPORATION — $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGlencoe Historical Society — $175 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Edidin Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph