Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edgar a & Ruth E Robinson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$435k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.3MHealth$342kHuman Services$177kEducation$161kPhilanthropy$149kPublic Safety & Disaster$130kHousing & Shelter$125kCivil Rights$125kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $275k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION$105,000
DALLAS SYMPHONY FOUNDATION$50,000
SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$35,000
ADL$30,000
VOGEL ALCOVE$25,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$25,000
TEMPLE EMANU-EL$25,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS$20,000
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK$20,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$20,000
TEMPLE SINAI$20,000
UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS$13,000
SMITH CENTER$12,000
MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$10,000
DALLAS ZOO$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%VOGEL ALCOVE: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NV
OH
PA
RI
MD
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 20 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +89% since the first grant, against +62% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$2.4M
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+62%

Still filing today

75%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalHealthHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DALLAS SYMPHONY FOUNDATION
    5× · 2017–2025 · $792k · revenue +280%
  • SM
    SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $235k · revenue +163%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY
    4× · 2019–2024 · $165k · revenue +185%

Funded once

  • SM
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
  • TE
    TEMPLE EMANU-EI
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Jewish Community Foundation

To be your partner and trusted expert in charitable giving and effective philanthropy by empowering our community's charitable vision, safeguarding our community's resources and building enduring legacies.

Philanthropy
2
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
3
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
4
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
5
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
Jewelers of America Inc

Jewelers of america, the most trusted and influential voice of the jewelry industry, empowers and unites its members through expert guidance and advocacy, driving excellence, integrity, and success in an ever-changing marketplace.

—
8
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
9
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
10
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Family Service Agency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DALLAS SYMPHONY FOUNDATION: $791,680 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHONY FOUNDATIONDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $420,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION+2 more: $64,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY: $164,500 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCYIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEMPLE EMANU-EL: $75,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANU-ELADL: $60,000 · OtherADLMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $50,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTERUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $40,000 · OtherSOUTHERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $90,000 · OtherSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $40,000 · OtherDALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 · Other+14 more: $172,000 · Other+14 moreSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $235,000 · EducationSOUTHWEST…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $116,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $13,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $125,000 · Civil RightsVOGEL ALCOVE: $125,000 · Human ServicesBROWN UNIVERSITY: $120,000 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$1,275,680Other$856,500Education$236,000Philanthropy$129,000Civil Rights$125,000Human Services$125,000Community Improvement$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY FOUNDATION: $791,680 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $420,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $235,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY: $164,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOGEL ALCOVE: $125,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS: $116,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $90,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS THEATER CENTER: $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Smith Center for the Performing Arts: $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREATER DALLAS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGREENHILL SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS THEATER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds The Smith Center for the Performing Arts ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGAS SIGESMUND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREATER DALLAS ↗
  • Who funds GREENHILL SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edgar a & Ruth E Robinson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edgar a & Ruth E Robinson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edgar a & Ruth E Robinson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph