Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eddy Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$34k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$76kEducation$32kHousing & Shelter$16kFood & Nutrition$15kPhilanthropy$8kYouth Development$8kArts & Culture$8kEnvironment$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$527k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Institute for Better Education$8,000
Assistance League of Tucson$5,500
Youth On Their Own$3,500
ECBA$2,000
Community Food Bank$2,000
Habitat For Humanity - Tucson$2,000
The Ronald McDonald House Charity$2,000
Montana State Foundation$1,000
The Montana Land Reliance$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Archy Bray Association$1,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tucson$1,000
Junior Achievement of AZ$880
New Pathways for Youth$880
Fresh Start Womens Foundation$880
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Fresh Start Womens Foundation: $880 → 11%Intermountain Childrens Home: $500 → 9%Intermountain Childrens Home: $500 → 9%Intermountain Childrens Home: $250 → 9%Intermountain Childrens Home: $250 → 9%Intermountain Childrens Home: $250 → 9%Intermountain Childrens Home: $250 → 9%Intermountain Childrens Home: $220 → 9%Youth On Their Own: $4k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $4k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $3k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $3k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $2k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $2k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $2k → 15%Youth On Their Own: $2k → 15%Assistance League of Tucson: $6k → 15%Assistance League of Tucson: $5k → 15%Assistance League of Tucson: $5k → 15%Assistance League of Tucson: $5k → 15%Assistance League of Tucson: $5k → 15%Assistance League of Tucson: $5k → 15%Assistance League of Tucson: $5k → 15%Assistance League of Tucson: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 19 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$173k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+30%

Still filing today

74%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    VIVA PIMA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +143%
  • IF
    Institute for Better Education
    6× · 2019–2024 · $29k · revenue +6%
  • YO
    YOUTH ON THEIR OWN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +138%

Funded once

  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • CC
    Children Clinics for Rehabilitation
    one grant, 2022 · $750
  • AB
    ARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $500 · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

—
2
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
3
Arizona Youth Partnership

Arizona youth partnership, (azyp), empowers youth to harness their strengths to live healthy and purposeful lives.

Health
4
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
5
Foster 360

Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.

Human Services
6
Yavapai Big Brothers Big Sisters Foundation
—
7
Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation

Arizona Friends of Foster Children Foundation creates opportunities to build self-esteem and empower children and youth in foster care by funding social, athletic and educational activities and services to enrich their life experiences and…

Human Services
8
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
9
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
10
Arizona Legal Women and Youth Services

No cost legal services provided to vulnerable young people and trafficking survivors to help eliminate barriers to safety, stability, and opportunity. Specializing in family law, criminal history repair, vital document collection, and…

Crime & Legal
11
Jobs for Arizona's Graduates

To help young people stay in school and to acquire the academic, personal, leadership, and vocational skills they will need to be successful upon graduation.

Education
12
Arizona Diaper Bank

We promote dignity through community partnerships by making diapers, period products, and incontinence supplies accessible.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A New Leaf; the most unlike its peers is Calistoga Community Chest. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIVA PIMA: $39,500 · Human ServicesVIVA PIMAYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20,050 · Human ServicesYOUTH ON THEIR OWNIntermountain Childrens Home: $2,220 · Human Services+1 more: $880 · Human ServicesThe Ronald McDonald House Charity: $10,900 · OtherThe Ronald McDonald House Chari…Montana State Foundation: $8,000 · OtherMontana State FoundationBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED: $7,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOU…Archy Bray Association: $7,000 · OtherArchy Bray AssociationARIZONA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherARIZONA DENTAL FOUNDATIONcanyon del oro Football: $2,000 · OtherECBA: $2,000 · OtherTucson Youth Football & Spirit Federation Inc: $3,350 · OtherTucson Youth Football & Spirit …+11 more: $7,610 · Other+11 moreInstitute for Better Education: $29,261 · EducationInstitute for Bett…+2 more: $1,000 · EducationCommunity Food Bank Inc: $14,500 · Food & NutritionHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $14,200 · Housing & ShelterTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $7,500 · EnvironmentCARE FUND: $1,868 · HealthA NEW LEAF: $880 · HealthIntegrative Touch: $717 · Health
Human Services$62,650Other$50,860Education$30,261Food & Nutrition$14,500Housing & Shelter$14,200Environment$7,500Health$3,465

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIVA PIMA: $39,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetInstitute for Better Education: $29,261 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH ON THEIR OWN: $20,050 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $14,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Tucson Inc: $14,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTucson Youth Football & Spirit Federation Inc: $3,350 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetARIZONA DENTAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetIntermountain Childrens Home: $2,220 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCARE FUND: $1,868 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA NEW LEAF: $880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Pathways For Youth: $880 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIntegrative Touch: $717 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIVA PIMA ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Better Education ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity Tucson Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Tucson Youth Football & Spirit Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA DENTAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Intermountain Childrens Home ↗
  • Who funds CARE FUND ↗
  • Who funds FRESH START WOMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF ↗
  • Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
  • Who funds Integrative Touch ↗
  • Who funds THE FORT LEWIS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARCHIE BRAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALISTOGA COMMUNITY CHEST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Nicholas W Genematas II Foundation · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Washington Federal Foundation · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Texas Instruments Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eddy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eddy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eddy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Eddy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eddy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph