Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ed and Susan Yang Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$92kScience & Tech$83kEducation$41kPublic Benefit$33kRecreation & Sports$30kCommunity Improvement$14kHealth$7kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$2,200
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Purdue Research Foundation$20,000
Connect Church Silicon Valley$13,050
River of Life Church$5,300
Global Church Network$4,121
KDFC$2,200
Daily Hope Ministries$2,200
The Rotary Foundation$1,625
Humane Society Silicon Valley$1,000
University of the Nations Kona$500
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Yu-AI Kai: $950 → 8%Yu-AI Kai: $500 → 8%CEF NorCal Silicon Valley: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
IN
CA
NE
VA
MD
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 19 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
20

Total granted

$270k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+38%

Still filing today

37%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SK
    SHOTOKAN KARATE OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $30k · revenue +41%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $24k · revenue +33%
  • HI
    Hudson Institute Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $7k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • PR
    Purdue Research Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Chinese Christian Scholars Association in North America

To share Gospel with Chinese intellectuals. The goals of the Association are 1. to network and discipline Chinese Christian scholars in North America for their moral and academic excellence, 2. to reach the unreached Chinese academic world…

Religion
3
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
4
China Evangelical Seminary Association Inc

China Evangelical Seminary Association, Inc was formed for the dissemination of religious education and instruction abroad, to raise and provide funds for those purposes, for the training and educations of qualified students at the China…

Education
5
Chinese Christian Life Fellowship Inc

To edify and make disciples of mainland china and overseas chinese christians to become devoted to only one great person: jesus christ the lord and savior and be motivated by only one greater purpose: building up his church for his glory

Religion
6
China Digital Times Inc

CDT is an independent, bilingual media organization that brings uncensored news and online voices from China to the world.

Arts & Culture
7
Centrihall Chinese Christian Education Services Inc

Develop and publish multi-media Christian courses for e-learning

Religion
8
San Jose Canaan Taiwanese Christian Fdn

To share the message of the gospel of christ through strategic, evangelical, christian endeavors and thus fulfill the great commission and the propagation of the truth in jesus christ.

Religion
9
Fudan University Education Development Foundation

1) Support academic research and talents cultivation in Fudan University. 2) Promote higher education in Fudan University and other educational organizations in China. 3) Strengthen global cooperations of education and research. 4) Enhance…

Education
10
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
11
China Harvest Inc

The primary exempt purpose of China Harvest, Inc.: A strategic catalyst for service to Chinese people worldwide.

Religion
12
American Friends of International China Concern Limited

The Organization is a Christian development organization that provides love, hope, and opportunity to children with disabilities and strives to end abandonment by keeping families together. To accomplish this mission, the Organization…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is On Lok Inc; the most unlike its peers is Silicon Valley Canaan Evergreen Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOME OF CHRIST: $37,600 · OtherHOME OF CHRISTTrump Make America Great Again Comm: $16,347 · OtherTrump Make America Great Again CommDaily Hope Ministries: $14,800 · OtherDaily Hope MinistriesCONNECT CHURCH SILICON VALLEY: $13,050 · OtherCONNECT CHURCH SILICON VALLEYSabah Chinese High School: $11,000 · OtherSabah Chinese High SchoolSecond Harvest of Silicon Valley: $8,025 · OtherHudson Institute Inc: $6,700 · OtherWelcome to Chinatown: $6,030 · OtherKDFC: $5,730 · Other+23 more: $52,466 · Other+23 morePurdue Research Foundation: $80,000 · EducationPurdue Research FoundationUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $24,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INCSILICON VALLEY CANAAN EVERGREEN ACADEMY: $4,500 · EducationSHOTOKAN KARATE OF AMERICA INC: $30,200 · Recreation & SportsSHOTOKAN K…CEF Norcal: $2,000 · Human ServicesYU-AI KAI JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER: $1,450 · Human ServicesSTREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $2,000 · ReligionTOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE: $1,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $400 · ReligionCHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $526 · PhilanthropyHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $2,000 · Animals
Other$171,748Education$108,500Recreation & Sports$30,200Human Services$3,450Religion$3,400Philanthropy$2,526Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPurdue Research Foundation: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHOTOKAN KARATE OF AMERICA INC: $30,200 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $24,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHudson Institute Inc: $6,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSILICON VALLEY CANAAN EVERGREEN ACADEMY: $4,500 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetSTREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCEF Norcal: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYU-AI KAI JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER: $1,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGlobal Taiwan Institute: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC: $526 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetON LOK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Purdue Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHOTOKAN KARATE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC ↗
  • Who funds Hudson Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds SILICON VALLEY CANAAN EVERGREEN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CHINA EVANGELISTIC MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds STREAM OF PRAISE MUSIC MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CEF Norcal ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE CANCER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YU-AI KAI JAPANTOWN COMMUNITY SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Global Taiwan Institute ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOUCH LIFE MISSION DR GORDON S LEE ↗
  • Who funds PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF DINNER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ed and Susan Yang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ed and Susan Yang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ed and Susan Yang Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ed and Susan Yang Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ed and Susan Yang’s filings →

    More from the funding graph