Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Economic Development Corporation of Kansas City Missouri

The mission of the edc is to drive economic development and create an environment in which businesses and residents can prosper and grow in kansas city, missouri.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF KANSAS CITY MISSOURI’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 22 grants below total $1,350,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,716,748 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $366,748 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC$1,000,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$150,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CUPINI'S$15,000
URBAN ON ARMOUR & TROOST$15,000
Individual grant recipient$13,000
OURHOUSEKC$12,000
KOBI Q$12,000
NICK AND NINO S PUB$11,000
Individual grant recipient$11,000
THE COMBINE$11,000
ODDLY CORRECT LLC$10,000
CAFE OLLAMA LLC$10,000
BUFFALO STATE PIZZA CO$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER: $10k → 15%KC DIGITAL DRIVE: $6k → 15%KC DIGITAL DRIVE: $6k → 15%DOWNTOWN KANSAS CITY CIVIC VENTURES: $35k → 15%THELMA'S KITCHEN: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.6M · 7 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
25

Total granted

$5.6M
$2.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+36%

Still filing today

100%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’25
Arts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL
    EDC LOAN CORPORATION
    4× · 2017–2021 · $3.4M · revenue +8% · 76% of their budget
  • NL
    NEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC
    2× · 2021–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +182%
  • KC
    KANSAS CITY AREA DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
    2× · 2019–2020 · $17k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • RM
    RUSSELL MERIT LLC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M
  • TL
    The Leroy Satchel Paige Family Home Corp Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR REGENERATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Economic Development Corporation of Kansas City Missouri

The mission of the edc is to drive economic development and create an environment in which businesses and residents can prosper and grow in kansas city, missouri.

2
The Downtown Council

The mission of the downtown council is to to create and maintain an urban environment that provides (1) economic reasons for businesses to be downtown, (2) a quality of life that encourages people to live downtown, and (3) enterainment and…

3
Main Street Corridor Development Corp Dba Midtown Kc Now

Work to suport commercial, mixed use, and residential progress and effective community, economic, and aesthetic development to create and encourage the renewal and vitality of Midtown Kansas City, Missouri.

Community Improvement
4
South Kansas City Chamber of Commerce

To promote area commerce

5
Wichita Downtown Development Corporation

The mission of Downtown Wichita is to cultivate opportunities that revitalize and enhance Wichita's urban core.

Community Improvement
6
Kansas City Community Land Trust

Acquire and develop real estate to provide safe, decent, and affordable housing to low-income homeowners while working to ensure a culturally, ethnically, and economically diverse and stable community where generations can thrive in place.

Housing & Shelter
7
Kansas City Regional Destination Develop Ment Foundation

The foundation enhances the quality of life for the kansas city region through tourism advocacy and workforce development.

Community Improvement
8
Dickinson County Economic Development Corporation

To promote economic development in dickinson county by attracting new industries and retaining existing businesses while enhancing and improving the quality of life for businesses, residents and visitors.

Community Improvement
9
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
10
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
11
Kansas City Artists Coalition Inc

The kansas city atrtists coalition is a nonprofit organization that promotes visual arts awareness

Arts & Culture
12
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Downtown Kansas City Civic Ventures and the most unlike its peers is Kansas City Startup Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 24. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%7%<5yr11%14%5–10yr15%25%10–20yr14%29%20–35yr11%21%35–55yr30%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%11%<5yr11%16%5–10yr15%1%10–20yr14%5%20–35yr11%62%35–55yr30%5%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
698/5,308

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EDC LOAN CORPORATION — $3,390,242 · OtherEDC LOAN CORPORATIONRUSSELL MERIT LLC — $1,000,000 · OtherRUSSELL MERIT LLCTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $370,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY+32 more — $291,000 · Other+32 moreNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC — $1,010,000 · Arts & CultureNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBA…The Leroy Satchel Paige Family Home Corp Inc — $500,000 · Arts & CultureThe Leroy Satchel Pa…+3 more — $25,000 · Arts & CultureEDC STRATEGIC INITIATIVES FUND — $1,110,000 · Community ImprovementEDC STRATEGIC I…+3 more — $39,250 · Community ImprovementTHE GIVING BACK FUND — $250,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR REGENERATION INC — $250,000 · Housing & ShelterDOWNTOWN KANSAS CITY CIVIC VENTURES — $35,000 · Human ServicesKC DIGITAL DRIVE INC — $12,500 · Human ServicesRECONCILIATION SERVICES — $10,000 · Human ServicesHEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER — $10,000 · Human ServicesKANSAS CITY STARTUP FOUNDATION — $10,500 · EducationGLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP NETWORK — $10,000 · EducationBLACK ARCHIVES OF MID-AMERICA INC — $10,000 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION FOR DELTA EDUCATIONAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $10,000 · Education
Other$5,051,242Arts & Culture$1,535,000Community Improvement$1,149,250Philanthropy$250,000Housing & Shelter$250,000Human Services$67,500Education$40,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEDC LOAN CORPORATION — $3,390,242 over 4y, 76% of budgetEDC STRATEGIC INITIATIVES FUND — $1,110,000 over 2y, 94% of budgetNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC — $1,010,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $370,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND — $250,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDOWNTOWN KANSAS CITY CIVIC VENTURES — $35,000 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetProspect Business Association — $20,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetKANSAS CITY AREA DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL — $17,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKC DIGITAL DRIVE INC — $12,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetTwelfth Street Heritage Development Corporation — $12,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY STARTUP FOUNDATION — $10,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGLOBAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP NETWORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY FRIENDS OF ALVIN AILEY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRECONCILIATION SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF AMERICA INDIAN CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBLACK ARCHIVES OF MID-AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FOR DELTA EDUCATIONAL & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT — $10,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCHARLOTTE STREET FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE HELP — $10,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetCHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF GREATER KANSAS CITY — $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIONEXUS KC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMUSICAL THEATER HERITAGE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOLICE FOUNDATION OF KANSAS CITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPLATTE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ewing Marion Kauffman FoundationMO29.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Arvest Foundation · Hall Family Foundation · Hallmark Corporate Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Economic Development Corporation of Kansas City Missouri funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph