· Public charity
Ecmc Group Inc
Ecmc group, inc's mission is to help students succeed by creating, providing and investing in innovative educational opportunities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $154k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $244k
- $250k+3 grants · $105M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ECMC FOUNDATION | $82,935,000 |
| EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION | $12,611,000 |
| ECMC EDUCATION INC | $9,600,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION | $193,700 |
| REVE ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL TWIN CITIES | $48,750 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH | $47,560 |
| BESTPREP | $25,500 |
| JOBS FOR THE FUTURE | $21,800 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SACRAMENTO INC | $10,100 |
| HIRED | $7,750 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC | $7,500 |
| MATTER | $5,100 |
| READING PARTNERS TWIN CITIES | $5,013 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EFECMC FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $270M · revenue +76% · 100% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $758k · revenue +137%
- JAJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH8× · 2017–2024 · $273k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- CSCORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +269%
- AAALBUQUERQUE ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +38%
- OSOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
Mcee equips minnesotans with the economic and personal financial knowledge and skills to make informed decisions and thrive in our complex world. we fulfill our mission by teaching teachers through top quality professional development and…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement North and the most unlike its peers is Crhs Sacramento Work Study Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ECMC EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds ECMC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH ↗
- Who funds BESTPREP ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CORO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SACRAMENTO INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REVE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANN BANCROFT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOBS FOR THE FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CRHS Sacramento Work Study Inc ↗
- Who funds CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Southeast Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Georgia ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL CHAMBER DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS DOWNTOWN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds HIRED ↗
- Who funds URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MATTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ecmc Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Hb Fuller Company Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Educational Credit Management Corporation · Wells Fargo Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Hubbard Broadcasting Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ecmc Group Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jobs for the Future Inc — 11% of income from government
- Junior Achievement of Tampa Bay Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.